Anyone else finds Andrew Tate's downfall absolutely hilarious?

bro, why do you care so much about him?
Why do i care about someone being accused of raping when the court hasn't concluded crap?

Why do i want someone to not have raped women especially when the evidneces don't align explicitly, no victims have come forward?

Why do I care about when the person being accused by an organization high influenced by Murican politics, openly speaks about genocide, masculinity, religion, problems of the west and has massive influence among youth? And the prosecuting organisation shows its colors when it pays women to act lile victims against him.

No shit some of my views align with his but i hold ground where we differ.

All I'm saying is that let the evidneces unravel in the trial rather than taking a bias stand against him.
 
It is not uncommon for courts to do that especially if it is about open public cases.
Yea lol the court just keeps releasing the prosecutor's evidneces against Tates like hell with confidentiality of evidneces lol..i wonder if they ever released any counter evidences from the defendants lawyers. Ironically no media claims that its from the court itself Its pretty obvious it's DICOT.


But Tell your self that made up shit if it helps you sleep well..
 

Adam 🍎

Pretty Boy
β€Ž
Yea lol the court just keeps releasing the prosecutor's evidneces against Tates like hell with confidentiality of evidneces lol..i wonder if they ever released any counter evidences from the defendants lawyers. Ironically no media claims that its from the court itself Its pretty obvious it's DICOT.


But Tell your self that made up shit if it helps you sleep well..
Nah public cases that are in interest of public often release information to the public via press. Same happened to Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, Trump and so on.

Also if trial is public once the evidence has been forwarded to the judge it can be released via request bcs at that time the evidence did its purpose and its original form is kept safe in court records
 
Correction : YOU assume he admits to his crimes while he clearly doesn't there are literally legal lawyers out there that have defended him on that.
And there's lawyers who say that is clear admission of guilt. What's your point? his defenders would defend him? Kinda fucking obvious. Even murderers with stacked evidence against them are owed a defense.
Again I'm not sick to want Andrew to not have raped someone , no, but you sure are given how desperate you are.. Or just straight up dense given what you seemingly consider concrete evidnece.
No you are sick because you are defending a self admitted rapist. I don't want anyone to be raped, which is why I want Tate in jail or in a ditch. Everything I've stated is because he has already done it. Don't project your wants unto me.

Yesss that's exactly how you look like when going off of charges, which might I remind are allegations that aren't proven and you based his conviction on it . Its soo dumb to take what Andrew said in the past as evidnece when he literally denies meaning any of that let alone saying some of that.
So let me get this straight, when Tate says he's pimping women and likes em young he's lying, but when he denies it he isn't?

You're admitting he's a liar yet you trust him? and am the guy sucking him off? You're litterally bending over backwards to defend him LMAO.


There hasn't been a single woman that has come out against him out of the 50..not one and here you sit soo desperately clinging on what he said in the past.
So you're just spewing Tate propaganda? There are literally witnesses in both cases you dumbass. There's also cases in the UK where women came forward.

Its all so obvious to someone rational minded when the prosecutors try to defame the defendant every step of the way by leaking their evidneces,
A rational mind would see a man admit to crimes, get charged with those crimes and believe his guilty. Nothing about your Tate defense is rational.

If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck it aint a fucking cat.

but hell they can't find a single woman to put forward for the public to seal the deal atleast publicly.
Again Tateganda.



This is typical, but guess what they actually have done is pay women to speak against him.. But that evidnece you don't look at given how shortsighted and I'll-reasoned or even ill-faithed you are which is pitiful to say the least.
LMAO the matrix got him

you are legit retarded, seek help


:gokulaugh:



Its ironic coz you revived this thread for me after nearly a year.. LMFAO.
Because I revel in the downfall of scumbags like him.
 
Nah public cases that are in interest of public often release information to the public via press. Same happened to Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, Trump and so on.

Also if trial is public once the evidence has been forwarded to the judge it can be released via request bcs at that time the evidence did its purpose and its original form is kept safe in court records
Do you understand that shifting gears through a swift Google search here won't do when you literally slipped here?

You went from "IT WAS ISSUED BY THE COURT" implying that court itself issued it independently also implying that the court had picked a side against Tates to "it was requested to be be released by the prosecutors"

So you see how devious you are? Like you just proved my point about your credibility.



And @Roo like bruh stop recycling that shallow shit if you dint have a proper reply mate with all due respect.
Post automatically merged:

Because I revel in the downfall of scumbags like him
So the schlong point stands, take it out.
 
Last edited:
As cringey as Tate has been getting, these random arrests don’t be making sense at all. This has been going on for a while now with no solid evidence being brought to go ahead with the allegations. When he originally got locked up last year people were convinced before anything even came out yet there hasn’t been any evidence brought to charge these dudes for over a year.
 
Top