There is no such thing as past life. Life is a unique, complex organization of molecules expressing itself through chemical reactions which lead to growth, development, responsiveness, adaptation and reproduction.
There is no such thing as past life. Life is a unique, complex organization of molecules expressing itself through chemical reactions which lead to growth, development, responsiveness, adaptation and reproduction.
There is no such thing as past life. Life is a unique, complex organization of molecules expressing itself through chemical reactions which lead to growth, development, responsiveness, adaptation and reproduction.
Also.. on top of what I said previously.. there is something funny with the concept of reincarnation:
Take into account the fact that the probability of finding life in our own solar system is very high. Now, note that there are on average 6 planets around stars in galaxies. Then, think about the fact that there are on average 100 BILLION stars in a galaxy. And finally take the fact that there is an estimate number of 2 TRILLION galaxies in the universe.....
And yet.. most people only "remember" their past life on earth..
This would mean that reincarnations are limited to planets or close proximity.
I have a question for those who believe in eternal reincarnation or even eternal life after death...
You guys might know the three probable far future of our universe :
- The Big Freeze or heat death (when everything would decay.. even atomes)
- The Big Rip (when the extrem expension of space time will stretch all matter to the point of breaking it appart)
- The Big Crunch (if somehow the expension of the Universe slows down and gravity starts to bring everything back together to a single point)
So... how to you keep these beliefs about eternal life coherent with the knowledge of those possible futures ?
Of course yes. with this argument I'm not arguing if Reincarnation is possible or not.
What, I'm wondering is how do we keep the belief coherent with those three scenarios ? What happens to reincarnation if there is nothing left or not even space time maybe.. OR what happens if all matter is reduced to a single point, more than a billion time smaller than an atom... ?
Of course yes. with this argument I'm not arguing if Reincarnation is possible or not.
What, I'm wondering is how do we keep the belief coherent with those three scenarios ? What happens to reincarnation if there is nothing left or not even space time maybe.. OR what happens if all matter is reduced to a single point, more than a billion time smaller than an atom... ?
We all are made up of star dusts and stars themselves are made up of matter immediately formed after big bang from the unstable energy.
Material universe you see is transient. In all the scenarios, this material universe will end but energy which can neither be created nor destroyed and can only change its form is eternal.
Thus, one can argue that rebirth of soul (energy itself) is eternal.
I am sure there are many religious beliefs regarding it but I don't want to go into them.
So this would mean that to keep said belief coherent, you would need to believe that energy itself IS the soul but that energy (in this context) can keep a trace of its previous configuration
The Universe is infinite. Explaining how is kind of difficult, though. You'd need someone a lot smarter than me. Someone who understands how Haki Diverges and Converges (this is a joke NO ONE LINK HIM HERE)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.