Yes and No
I like most of Act 1, late Onigashima and Oden FB, but its clear that Wano wasnt the best Arc in post-TS, the build up in act 2 was full of minor plots that no one cared about, and especilly early Onigashima was really bad, with things like Ice-Oni, Hyo, Gifter/Tama, BM running around, Sanji bullshit, P1/Ulti and Scabbards drama.
The final fights were good, especially Robin, Zoro and Luffy ones, and also the when the CP0 started to move seems like the arc was really relevant to the world, yet a thing everyone could agree is that there was no real threat to the Alliance, especially after Luffy and adult Momo comming back from falling from Onigashima, that the victory become clear.
Of all Wano things the one i hated the most is probably one of the most important to the Arc, the Hito Hito no Mi: model Nika, not just feel like something Oda came up in the chapter of Jinbei vs WsW, because the total lack of foreshadow, that could be easy put in places like Shandora and and Fishman Island that had heavy connection to Joy Boy or even in a small dialogue of the Gorosei about Luffy with one of them commenting something like "And that Garp grandson, his fruit....", what would plant the seeds for his fruit being something more.
Not that i dislike the Powers of Nika fruit, i thinked they could just be the Awakening of the Gomu Gomu without the name change, and with a small foreshadow of it before the TS woud change this thing of the Gorosei knowing Luffy is a fucking D. with JoyBoy fruit and doing nothing, yet they cared more about Ace, who didnt have Joy Boy fruit, all the thing of Roger, WB and the WG thinking Ace would be the next JoyBoy become nonsense after Oda created the Jesus fruit, that Roger, WB and Gorosei all should know about as they knew the true history.
I give a 6/10 to Wano