I have discussed a theme with my friends many times.
I believe in the concept of author's death, I dislike how some people try to think "Oda would think this or he thinks that" like they are their mental therapists or some shit.
Torishima, historical editor of Toriyama has actually explained my view on the topic.
Kazuhiko Torishima: Once the work is published, you can't go there and explain your intentions. The manga no longer belongs to the author or the editor: it belongs to the reader. It's in their hands. What will the reader think? Do you ask yourself this question when you draw?
I don't think that people underestimating Mihawk or sengoku is a fan problem, it's an author problem. We got the last word, the power.
If the Manga makes Mihawk say he will go out at marineford with pre ts luffy is it really our fault?
I gave up to be clear, Mihawk is indeed stronger than Shanks since the Rocks Kanji dropped.
But, has the author suceded in make this clear for his audience? The average not obsessed one piece I engage with irl, like girls etc. all think lowly of Mihawk, or don't consider sengoku at all close to Garp.
Is this our fault? I think it's not.
It's Oda's job to concretize his ideas in the Manga, until he does that remember that an idea has to be accepted my editor and the likes.
One piece is not Oda, One piece is a product made by Oda and his editors, but the moment the chapter drops if Oda doesn't concretize his idea then it's not valid.
Random example, Oda can tell me "I actually wanted to portray X like this" but if he fails to do so and it contradicts the Manga, I will take the Manga over the author words.
Oda can tell me Sanji is stronger THAN zoro in sbs or interviews, this wouldn't be valid. Let's stop giving power to the authors, many said X and Y things in interviews and similar and then time later contradict their words in their work later on.
But even if the interview is after the Manga is finished, for example when Toriyama said that Babidy is actually Bibidy and not his son, do you really consider this? I don't.
Or do you consider Toriyama 6-10-15 scale for goku, beerus, whis? No, he contradicted this later on
Do you consider Toriyama saying goku won't use ssj3 after bog? No he did, what matters is when you concretizr your idea, ideas aren't Canon, when it's drawn black and white in the work it is and the work has a life itself, it's not the authors intent, it exists outside of him.
I believe in the concept of author's death, I dislike how some people try to think "Oda would think this or he thinks that" like they are their mental therapists or some shit.
Torishima, historical editor of Toriyama has actually explained my view on the topic.
Kazuhiko Torishima: Once the work is published, you can't go there and explain your intentions. The manga no longer belongs to the author or the editor: it belongs to the reader. It's in their hands. What will the reader think? Do you ask yourself this question when you draw?
I don't think that people underestimating Mihawk or sengoku is a fan problem, it's an author problem. We got the last word, the power.
If the Manga makes Mihawk say he will go out at marineford with pre ts luffy is it really our fault?
I gave up to be clear, Mihawk is indeed stronger than Shanks since the Rocks Kanji dropped.
But, has the author suceded in make this clear for his audience? The average not obsessed one piece I engage with irl, like girls etc. all think lowly of Mihawk, or don't consider sengoku at all close to Garp.
Is this our fault? I think it's not.
It's Oda's job to concretize his ideas in the Manga, until he does that remember that an idea has to be accepted my editor and the likes.
One piece is not Oda, One piece is a product made by Oda and his editors, but the moment the chapter drops if Oda doesn't concretize his idea then it's not valid.
Random example, Oda can tell me "I actually wanted to portray X like this" but if he fails to do so and it contradicts the Manga, I will take the Manga over the author words.
Oda can tell me Sanji is stronger THAN zoro in sbs or interviews, this wouldn't be valid. Let's stop giving power to the authors, many said X and Y things in interviews and similar and then time later contradict their words in their work later on.
But even if the interview is after the Manga is finished, for example when Toriyama said that Babidy is actually Bibidy and not his son, do you really consider this? I don't.
Or do you consider Toriyama 6-10-15 scale for goku, beerus, whis? No, he contradicted this later on
Do you consider Toriyama saying goku won't use ssj3 after bog? No he did, what matters is when you concretizr your idea, ideas aren't Canon, when it's drawn black and white in the work it is and the work has a life itself, it's not the authors intent, it exists outside of him.