Best MC Tournament Round 2

WHO WINS EACH FIGHT?


  • Total voters
    48
  • Poll closed .

Light D Lamperouge

๐–‚๐–๐–†๐–™ ๐•ฎ๐–”๐–š๐–‘๐–‰ ๐•ณ๐–†๐–›๐–Š ๐•ญ๐–Š๐–Š๐–“
โ€Ž
#42
OK, I've thought long about this and reached a decision. I will not disqualify Luffy immediately since that wouldn't be fair towards @KINGKONGGUN15 who had nothing to do with it, as opposed to the time I had to disqualify Odiak who was in cahoots with Fenaker, who did the same thing you now did @Hades.

Yeah I see.



@ODIAK D.TSEGNORTS I am sorry br0 I gave you all a chance and a warning but it's not working. Fenaker now even posted in the Zoro FC publicly telling people to vote for the Garou theme. Garou theme is disqualified. No hard feelings. You're welcome to other tournaments when I do it again, but not like this with the PMs and extra votes. I can understand a vote or two, but br0 you got 50 people in the previous one and now again your option has more than other fights have combined.

These posts in the Luffy FC are against the established norms.
@Bogard
@MonsterKaido
you have to vote for other characters also in the poll...otherwise your vote won't count....:josad:

@Rmstorm
@Noctis

vote for Luffy here....

https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/best-mc-tournament-round-2.15041/page-2#post-1528631

This is what got Odiak disqualified last time when Fenaker in cahoots with him posted in the Zoro fc telling people to vote for Garou theme. This will serve as the first warning. Had you maybe just posted the link without telling people to vote for Luffy specifically I might have been able to look the other way, but not like this.

As I said, I will not disqualify Luffy immediately, but I will subtract 6 votes off of him now. So remember when counting that Luffy starts with -6. Of course, if I see something like this again or someone else doing this again for Luffy I will have to disqualify Luffy immediately. I think this is more than fair from my side.
 
#43
OK, I've thought long about this and reached a decision. I will not disqualify Luffy immediately since that wouldn't be fair towards @KINGKONGGUN15 who had nothing to do with it, as opposed to the time I had to disqualify Odiak who was in cahoots with Fenaker, who did the same thing you now did @Hades.




These posts in the Luffy FC are against the established norms.





This is what got Odiak disqualified last time when Fenaker in cahoots with him posted in the Zoro fc telling people to vote for Garou theme. This will serve as the first warning. Had you maybe just posted the link without telling people to vote for Luffy specifically I might have been able to look the other way, but not like this.

As I said, I will not disqualify Luffy immediately, but I will subtract 6 votes off of him now. So remember when counting that Luffy starts with -6. Of course, if I see something like this again or someone else doing this again for Luffy I will have to disqualify Luffy immediately. I think this is more than fair from my side.
Is there anywhere exist such rule?......did you mention it in the opening post or somewhere else?.....:kriwhat:.......might as well disqualify Luffy as you are already counting from -6.....:josad:
 
#44
OK, I've thought long about this and reached a decision. I will not disqualify Luffy immediately since that wouldn't be fair towards @KINGKONGGUN15 who had nothing to do with it, as opposed to the time I had to disqualify Odiak who was in cahoots with Fenaker, who did the same thing you now did @Hades.




These posts in the Luffy FC are against the established norms.





This is what got Odiak disqualified last time when Fenaker in cahoots with him posted in the Zoro fc telling people to vote for Garou theme. This will serve as the first warning. Had you maybe just posted the link without telling people to vote for Luffy specifically I might have been able to look the other way, but not like this.

As I said, I will not disqualify Luffy immediately, but I will subtract 6 votes off of him now. So remember when counting that Luffy starts with -6. Of course, if I see something like this again or someone else doing this again for Luffy I will have to disqualify Luffy immediately. I think this is more than fair from my side.
Wait huh what happened?
 

Light D Lamperouge

๐–‚๐–๐–†๐–™ ๐•ฎ๐–”๐–š๐–‘๐–‰ ๐•ณ๐–†๐–›๐–Š ๐•ญ๐–Š๐–Š๐–“
โ€Ž
#45
Is there anywhere exist such rule?......did you mention it in the opening post or somewhere else?.....:kriwhat:.......might as well disqualify Luffy as you are already counting from -6.....:josad:
Yes this part is a reference to that
ALSO IF I SEE OR NOTICE SOME SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY THAT ENTRY WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.

and all the players are familiar with it due to the problems we had in the previous rounds which I why I linked that post of mine explaining why I had to disqualify Odiak's entry. It's like that due to the word limit. In any case, since you ostensibly weren't acquainted with it and it would not be fair toward the entry if they have no choice in it, I did not disqualify it immediately, like I did with the other one. Allowing it to stay and compete, with more than 4 hours remaining with only -6 in votes is a courteous move from my side, at least from my perspective. You may not tag people to tell them to vote for Luffy but you can keep the thread alive and advertise the thread without specifically telling people who to vote for.


Wait huh what happened?
The same thing that benefitted you in the past in the situation with Odiak. People were publicly tagging others telling them to vote for Luffy specifically. I did not disqualify your entry, but I had to subtract some votes off of it.
 
#47
and all the players are familiar with it due to the problems we had in the previous rounds which I why I linked that post of mine explaining why I had to disqualify Odiak's entry. It's like that due to the word limit. In any case, since you ostensibly weren't acquainted with it and it would not be fair toward the entry if they have no choice in it, I did not disqualify it immediately, like I did with the other one. Allowing it to stay and compete, with more than 4 hours remaining with only -6 in votes is a courteous move from my side, at least from my perspective. You may not tag people to tell them to vote for Luffy but you can keep the thread alive and advertise the thread without specifically telling people who to vote for.
Too bad then.....my unintentional act led to Luffy losing a chance it seems even though I didn't actively participate in this event......:josad:...to whoever submitted Luffy entry...
 

Light D Lamperouge

๐–‚๐–๐–†๐–™ ๐•ฎ๐–”๐–š๐–‘๐–‰ ๐•ณ๐–†๐–›๐–Š ๐•ญ๐–Š๐–Š๐–“
โ€Ž
#48
Too bad then.....my unintentional act led to Luffy losing a chance it seems even though I didn't actively participate in this event......:josad:...to whoever submitted Luffy entry...
Not necessarily. As I said there's around 4 hours remaining. You can post here keeping this thread alive and you can advertise this thread in other threads like the waiting room or something like that, but without telling people who to vote for.

You can advertise it like I do usually.

Something like this:


But without telling people or tagging people telling them who to vote for. This isn't/shouldn't be a popularity contest.
Post automatically merged:

anon445 and Silver's votes didn't count in this round. And Guts would have advanced further, RNG chose him, even if I hadn't subtracted those votes off of Luffy.
 
Last edited:
Top