these r 3 kekable posts in a row
hey ratchet i am here
maybe stop addressing me in future tense and you might get an answer?
Kekable isn't a word, nor does it actually mean anything to me. I don't need to phrase my language on your terms, given your stated positions it should be a pretty easy question to answer.
this when i flip town yada yada is weak sauce and has no impact of my initial scum read of you. by your own admittance this is not a defense, why should i entertain you when i scum read you?
It's not a defence, but it is holding you to account. I mean if you think I'm Scum here, what does it even matter? You don't just think I'm Scum, you believe it would take a miracle for me to be anything but, which is such a wild and unsubstantited take that I can only assume whatever you are reading me from must be very particular. I'll present it via memearrows
>ekko: u r scum this game ratchet, 100%
>ratchet: kay, dunno why you're so sure already
>ekko: it will take a miracle for u not to be kekekekekek
>ratchet: aight, so you're happy to bet your game on it then
>ekko: tumbleweed.jpeg
All I see here is a cowardly stance that projects bravado but, when it comes to commiting to a read you have blustered on, you're suddenly found wanting. You tag players that will naturally follow you against me, and in hindsight it looks like your plan is to simply dogpile. None of this exchange looks like you wanting to get into my head and figure me out, rather it's you bloviating around my slot trying to use that to convince others into following you.
And while we're at it, if you'd like me to bet my game on your flip, while I certainly don't actually need to do so, I'm happy to.
My position is that the contradiction you outlined lacked impact. If you're voting for a player, I'm going to take it you assume that player has done something wrong enough to warrant suspicion, and so if they're a a weak or blizzard thought process behind that I'm going to question it. That you're trying to telegraph to me here that your vote isn't serious or that you're not certain about him or whatever doesn't really change that.
*lacked impact* really may as well be saying nothing, because it's not the position you first had, but the one you've tried to bait and switch into when it was established that it was, actually, present. And it really should change your perspective, because none of my behaviour around that vote suggested it came from wanting to pursue a lynch on Pero.
