Speculations Can Sanji eos stop the hakai for one second?
- Thread starter Roronoa-sama
- Start date
If I drove a car at 200 mph and crash into a wall, what would happen to my car?
Exactly. Same thing.
Exactly. Same thing.
Mistake number 2- You are trying to aply real world logic into one piece world.
Mistake number 3- Sanji didnt bent shit and if King's beak did in fact bent, it wasnt Sanji, but his dad's technology who bent it.
Mistake number 4- Being a sanji fan.
Seems like it was given he was trying to hit Whitebeard. Why wouldn't you use one of if not your most powerful attack to World's Strongest Man? That doesn't make sense.
[automerge]1617838429[/automerge]
He salty cuase 'ZKK' got debunked. Don't pay attention to toxic side are mistake on being fake zoro fans.
[automerge]1617838429[/automerge]
This one is so unnecessary.
1. Have you seen car crashes? They vary, but they still show stuff like this.
2. I mean I seen your side use real life logic to force on other characters like Luffy being a 'condum' thinking he won't do anything to sharp objects, but have beaten enemies with weapons before.
3. He did. Sanji came back fine and actually held in place King's beak on impact and it bended his beak. Also wouldn't say Zoro being there is due to Enma the same way given Yonko's talk about sword and even Zoro?
4. Salty, aren't we? Your not helping your case here.
[automerge]1617838660[/automerge]
EOS Sanji, nah, he could block to deflect it just like EOS Zoro might do. Though still debating if they reach that level around Kaido and Big Mom.
2. I mean I seen your side use real life logic to force on other characters like Luffy being a 'condum' thinking he won't do anything to sharp objects, but have beaten enemies with weapons before.
3. He did. Sanji came back fine and actually held in place King's beak on impact and it bended his beak. Also wouldn't say Zoro being there is due to Enma the same way given Yonko's talk about sword and even Zoro?
4. Salty, aren't we? Your not helping your case here.
[automerge]1617838660[/automerge]
EOS Sanji, nah, he could block to deflect it just like EOS Zoro might do. Though still debating if they reach that level around Kaido and Big Mom.
1-Do you have any idea how fast 200mph actualy is? Have you ever seen whats left of a car after it colides to a solid object such as a massive concrete wall in such speeds?
2-Luffy himself says he is weak to blades, a blade will obviously damage him much more than a blunt atack would, just look at his fight with Katakuri and compare how much damage Katakuri's punches did in comparisson to his trident, your argument also makes no sense at all...soo just because Zoro and Sanji have beaten opponents that use blunt damage before means they are immune to this kind of atack too? what kind of logic is that?
3-Thats headcannon and anyone with a half working braincell knows it, King and no one ever mention his beak being bent let alone it being bent because of Sanji's raid suit.
Not at all comparable, Enma dosent cover Zoro's body and shield him from atacks, it was Zoro himself blocking the two yonkos atack, it was his strenght and haki that allowed him to injure Kaido, meanwhile when King atacked Sanji the RS did all the work in shielding him, in fact he couldnt even react at all. Any random foder that wears the raid suit would have been unscratched against King's atack, meanwhile any random foddder try to use enma and he imediately faints.
4-Are you realy talking about being salty after trying to bullshit your way into an argument by bringing up stuff from another thread while not even being competent in making an argument while doing soo?
2-Luffy himself says he is weak to blades, a blade will obviously damage him much more than a blunt atack would, just look at his fight with Katakuri and compare how much damage Katakuri's punches did in comparisson to his trident, your argument also makes no sense at all...soo just because Zoro and Sanji have beaten opponents that use blunt damage before means they are immune to this kind of atack too? what kind of logic is that?
3-Thats headcannon and anyone with a half working braincell knows it, King and no one ever mention his beak being bent let alone it being bent because of Sanji's raid suit.
Not at all comparable, Enma dosent cover Zoro's body and shield him from atacks, it was Zoro himself blocking the two yonkos atack, it was his strenght and haki that allowed him to injure Kaido, meanwhile when King atacked Sanji the RS did all the work in shielding him, in fact he couldnt even react at all. Any random foder that wears the raid suit would have been unscratched against King's atack, meanwhile any random foddder try to use enma and he imediately faints.
4-Are you realy talking about being salty after trying to bullshit your way into an argument by bringing up stuff from another thread while not even being competent in making an argument while doing soo?
Last edited:
1. It depends on the environment as wall could break through or not. Just saying I agree with @Tekashi69420 as he does have points, not biased ones like yours.
2. Yeah, but you guys use it like real life he would lose to someone for having weapon when we all know reality he wouldn't. Just stating same arguments your side use to why they even think Zoro is over Luffy because he has weapons which is dumb statement I see around here. Fights are not straightforward if you think like that.
3. Again insulting me doesn't help your point, it makes you look salty and unable to take seriously at all. He did bent the beak and you don't have to mention attacks harming you to see on physical standpoint on what it did. Point still shows King couldn't harm Sanji and he got his beak bend afterwards. Seems too convenient to be design change like that.
4. Again, fixed your attitude as your not helping your side at all and none is BS on my side unlike your trolling hate which is obvious just by looking at how your talking
.
2. Yeah, but you guys use it like real life he would lose to someone for having weapon when we all know reality he wouldn't. Just stating same arguments your side use to why they even think Zoro is over Luffy because he has weapons which is dumb statement I see around here. Fights are not straightforward if you think like that.
3. Again insulting me doesn't help your point, it makes you look salty and unable to take seriously at all. He did bent the beak and you don't have to mention attacks harming you to see on physical standpoint on what it did. Point still shows King couldn't harm Sanji and he got his beak bend afterwards. Seems too convenient to be design change like that.
4. Again, fixed your attitude as your not helping your side at all and none is BS on my side unlike your trolling hate which is obvious just by looking at how your talking
.
1. It depends on the environment as wall could break through or not. Just saying I agree with @Tekashi69420 as he does have points, not biased ones like yours.
2. Yeah, but you guys use it like real life he would lose to someone for having weapon when we all know reality he wouldn't. Just stating same arguments your side use to why they even think Zoro is over Luffy because he has weapons which is dumb statement I see around here. Fights are not straightforward if you think like that.
3. Again insulting me doesn't help your point, it makes you look salty and unable to take seriously at all. He did bent the beak and you don't have to mention attacks harming you to see on physical standpoint on what it did. Point still shows King couldn't harm Sanji and he got his beak bend afterwards. Seems too convenient to be design change like that.
4. Again, fixed your attitude as your not helping your side at all and none is BS on my side unlike your trolling hate which is obvious just by looking at how your talking.
2. Yeah, but you guys use it like real life he would lose to someone for having weapon when we all know reality he wouldn't. Just stating same arguments your side use to why they even think Zoro is over Luffy because he has weapons which is dumb statement I see around here. Fights are not straightforward if you think like that.
3. Again insulting me doesn't help your point, it makes you look salty and unable to take seriously at all. He did bent the beak and you don't have to mention attacks harming you to see on physical standpoint on what it did. Point still shows King couldn't harm Sanji and he got his beak bend afterwards. Seems too convenient to be design change like that.
4. Again, fixed your attitude as your not helping your side at all and none is BS on my side unlike your trolling hate which is obvious just by looking at how your talking
.
2-"muh BuT gUyS fRoM yOuR SiDe muhmuhmuh" dont bring others into your mess, i dont care what others from "my side" say, you are the one who brought some unrelared stuff from another thread to try proven a stupid point that no one here is talking about.
3-Let me see if i understand, you come here, try to start an argument by calling me salty, but at the same time cant handle me joking about your lack of braincells?
Your argument is this: "Sanji's RS bent King's beak because my headcannon says soo", thats literaly what you are saying right now LMAO.
4-Again, i dont hide the fact that i am a rude bastard, but at least take your head out of your own ass before trying to speak about "others atitudes", if you take an offensive tone and try to start an argument with someone expect someone to take an offensive tone back at you.
Last edited:
1. Every construction wall is different though and every car is different. Not all will have same impact as your stating.
2. Then call them out on it instead being biased on ignoring them. Just saying hypocrisy how you all try to use real life, but now when someone use it on you, you state not to use it.
3. You insulted me first when I talk to you, so that is on you and no headcannon in my statements, but do tell me your headcannon thinking Zoro would have tank it when Law stated he wouldn't and would die? Cause Head Piece is always on your toxic side.
4. I am not rude, been calm through this talk and you just coming off at me and getting off topic. If you want reasonable conversation. You have to calm down when talking to others, not get salty if they disagree with you on something.
2. Then call them out on it instead being biased on ignoring them. Just saying hypocrisy how you all try to use real life, but now when someone use it on you, you state not to use it.
3. You insulted me first when I talk to you, so that is on you and no headcannon in my statements, but do tell me your headcannon thinking Zoro would have tank it when Law stated he wouldn't and would die? Cause Head Piece is always on your toxic side.
4. I am not rude, been calm through this talk and you just coming off at me and getting off topic. If you want reasonable conversation. You have to calm down when talking to others, not get salty if they disagree with you on something.
2-Who the fuck is "you all"? put their names in here, dont be a pussy.
3-Tanked what? King? Zoro just tanked an atack made by two yonkos, hated it all you want but he held back the atack long enough for everyone to get to safety. Tanking a YC1 after that is nothing.
4-And who says im not calm? just because i made a statement, anyone who pretends that its cannon that King's beak is bent with no evidence lack braincells? Just a tip, this whole stupid victim play you are trying to do is pathetic, and only works on twitter, just fix your own pathetic atittude before comming here to complain about mine.
3-Tanked what? King? Zoro just tanked an atack made by two yonkos, hated it all you want but he held back the atack long enough for everyone to get to safety. Tanking a YC1 after that is nothing.
4-And who says im not calm? just because i made a statement, anyone who pretends that its cannon that King's beak is bent with no evidence lack braincells? Just a tip, this whole stupid victim play you are trying to do is pathetic, and only works on twitter, just fix your own pathetic atittude before comming here to complain about mine.
2. I would, but your toxic side all think the same, that I have long list on stating everyone on your side.
3. He did. and Zoro didn't tank anything. He was going to die and that is clear. Law should get feats for saving him so fast when he even stated he will die in attack and die attack when Kaido charge at him. You don't get feats from attacks that will kill you and you don't succeed. Sanji tanked King and came out fine. Not same case at all.
4. Coming from guy who say Zoro can tank and survive attack from 2 Yonkos and ignoring Law saving him from dying and told him again in recent chapter he was going to die with Kaido charging at him? Yeah, your only one acting stupid here and can't talk fault like you guys can't take fault on 'ZKK' being debunked. Don't get salty because you guys can't back anything on that part at all. Face the truth rather than toxic headcannon.
3. He did. and Zoro didn't tank anything. He was going to die and that is clear. Law should get feats for saving him so fast when he even stated he will die in attack and die attack when Kaido charge at him. You don't get feats from attacks that will kill you and you don't succeed. Sanji tanked King and came out fine. Not same case at all.
4. Coming from guy who say Zoro can tank and survive attack from 2 Yonkos and ignoring Law saving him from dying and told him again in recent chapter he was going to die with Kaido charging at him? Yeah, your only one acting stupid here and can't talk fault like you guys can't take fault on 'ZKK' being debunked. Don't get salty because you guys can't back anything on that part at all. Face the truth rather than toxic headcannon
.