And I have done that in length but you're the one pretending that a) he may have wielded a scythe before b) that orochi (who is noted to be sick a cruel) wouldn't put hardship on Killer's situation when he clearly loves to do that c) that kid was tortured when we have never seen that being hinted - perhaps it'll change and King will be shown torturing him but so far he and Killer where badly hurt by Kaido and took weeks to heal.
So if you want to convince me - or anyone - you'll have to back it up with proofs, because I work with what the manga has given us :
1.Killer never used scythes before and dumped them as soon as possible
2.Orochi has been noted by several characters, including Kaido, to be twisted and sick and those he hates have to suffer - he never gives them a chance, he always stake the odds against them (as seen with Oden and the Red Scabbards)
3.Kidd and Killer fought Kaido until they couldn't move and were deprived of healing for some time, meaning that even weeks after the battle they were still injured
4.Everything coming from the outside world is suppressed in Wano, including weapons who are hard to come by - mechanical scythes would a huge clue that Kamazou isn't jsut a crazed killer in the streets, which was the cover he was given so he could kill those Orochi wanted to see die without being officially involved
Those are hard facts from the manga. If you want to tell us Killer wielded scythes before and that it didn't change his fighting style or prowesses, okay. If you want to tell us that Orochi wouldn't have staked odds against him or that he'd have been okay with someone wielding obviously foreign weapons in Wano, okay. If you want to tell us that Killer and Kidd were tortured by King or other BP - or even just Kidd, okay.
Were are the hard facts in the manga which support your point of view?
You made an assumption based on your imagination. Writing walls of texts is plain stupid when you're just making the same mistake.
If you claim something based on assumptions that doesn't mean anyone else querying your assumptions needs to post proof HIMSELF.
Now, I'm gonna repeat it plain and simple.
What you're doing is making a theory that has multiple flaws.
ONE, You say Killer never used scythes before but we've never seen Killer fight other than in Sabaody or in Wano.
TWO, You say Orochi is twisted and wants people to suffer but we've never seen him do the same to his personal assassins or ninjas, like the Oniwabanshu. We've seen this with civilians. Orochi has no issues who do as he says.
THREE, You say Kidd and Killer fought Kaido and couldn't move and some weird shit based on nothing. What do you even mean by healing time? Killer was walking right after he was taken down by Zoro. Killer was in perfect condition a week after. We don't know how good Killer's regen is, you're assuming that he'd take X amount of time to recover from Kaido.
We don't even know if Killer did fight Kaido or if he was attacked by Apoo. AGAIN, an ASSUMPTION.
Facts my ass, these are assumptions that are flawed. If they were factual they wouldn't have been flawed this badly. Other possibilities exist. Are the things you call "facts" possible and true? Yes. Are they the ceritifed truth and do we have a confirmation on them? No. That means the other possibility will always exist.
You're writing some shit up and calling them "facts" and are pretending you're in the right. What you're doing is called making a theory based on assumptions.
