I still think he could have one. Anime never meant shit.
Powers & Abilities Debunking Literally Every Argument Against Ryokugyu’s Black Blade UPDATE: Confirmed! 09/04/2024
- Thread starter Elder Lee Hung
- Start date
Anime has nothing to do with the fact the guy has never even been shown to hold his sword on panel before. Oda would not give a guy a black blade only to give him multiple combat encounters and not have him even use the sword if he wanted Greenbull to have the third confirmed black blade. That plus nobody in Wano saying shit should have clued people into the idea being dumb from the start.
I hope Oda ends up making Aramakis blades black if only so that Admiral fans can relax a little with a W. So far the portrayal of Greenbull shows no respect or preference for Swordsmanship, so I heavily doubt that he has a feat shared only by Mihawk and Ryuma.
And yes it does matter if its a black blade because its been stated multiple times that black blades are both a swordmanship feat AND a straight weapon upgrade.
A swordsman who makes a black blade basically garuntees a Zoro fight unless its an ally. And Greenbull will never.
Ryokugu isnt a sword autist like Mihawk, Ryuma or Oden. It's like some shitter who takes up swords as a hobby making a blackblade.
Garps training was specifically for fist punching. Unless Ryokogu has a Mihawk/Ryuma level master (or the drive Zoro has), yes it would devalue it.
They arent contradictory, they're nuanced.
And yes it does matter if its a black blade because its been stated multiple times that black blades are both a swordmanship feat AND a straight weapon upgrade.
A swordsman who makes a black blade basically garuntees a Zoro fight unless its an ally. And Greenbull will never.
Ryokugu isnt a sword autist like Mihawk, Ryuma or Oden. It's like some shitter who takes up swords as a hobby making a blackblade.
Garps training was specifically for fist punching. Unless Ryokogu has a Mihawk/Ryuma level master (or the drive Zoro has), yes it would devalue it.
They arent contradictory, they're nuanced.
Also, lmao at Lee thinking Law is a swordsman due to that image but not Issho, when Law is almost more dependent on his fruit than Issho but is still called a swordsman, what did he expect?
Lee's gonna cope about it being an anti feat/outlier/Issho being casual even though he mocked Kaidou for the same thing with the Scabbards and Big Mom as well
Post automatically merged:
Lee's gonna cope about it being an anti feat/outlier/Issho being casual even though he mocked Kaidou for the same thing with the Scabbards and Big Mom as well
Last edited:
"Ryokugyu’s very much appears to be a legitimate black blade which is why multiple figurine companies interpreted it as such as Oda reinforced the blade’s black coloring in the official volume release...."
@Elder Lee Hung
@Elder Lee Hung
"Ryokugyu’s very much appears to be a legitimate black blade which is why multiple figurine companies interpreted it as such as Oda reinforced the blade’s black coloring in the official volume release...."
@Elder Lee Hung
@Elder Lee Hung
"Ryokugyu’s very much appears to be a legitimate black blade which is why multiple figurine companies interpreted it as such as Oda reinforced the blade’s black coloring in the official volume release...."
@Elder Lee Hung
@Elder Lee Hung
"Ryokugyu’s very much appears to be a legitimate black blade which is why multiple figurine companies interpreted it as such as Oda reinforced the blade’s black coloring in the official volume release...."
@Elder Lee Hung
@Elder Lee Hung
Just like Kizaru's cape is regular white in the anime
and his tie is pink
meanwhile in Oda's coloring, the cape is orange inside out
and the tie is yellow
Last edited: