Questions & Mysteries Did Aramaki defeat 2 full health YCs?
- Thread starter Black
- Start date
Not with the injuries they've sustained.
Look at cp9. Shit look at zoro getting cut open by mihawk. Effected for the next couple arcs. Or with thriller bark.
Look at sanji from the baratie to arlong Park. Or from ph to dressrosa. A little meat and sleep doesn't dismiss your previous injuries. No matter the headcanon.
These two took a massive ass whooping from some of the strongest attacks shown in the series. And they're still wrapped in bandages.
The Victor's aren't fully healed. You know the losers arent.
Look at cp9. Shit look at zoro getting cut open by mihawk. Effected for the next couple arcs. Or with thriller bark.
Look at sanji from the baratie to arlong Park. Or from ph to dressrosa. A little meat and sleep doesn't dismiss your previous injuries. No matter the headcanon.
These two took a massive ass whooping from some of the strongest attacks shown in the series. And they're still wrapped in bandages.
The Victor's aren't fully healed. You know the losers arent.
Last edited:
People cope by making rationalizations about this, but the entire reason Oda drew the scene in the first place was to put into perspective that Zoro and Sanji ain't hot shit like fans seem to think
Instead of asking yourself if King had seasetone or whatever, ask yourself why Oda drew Greenbull shitting on them effortlessly after Sanji and Zoro struggled so much against them
Instead of asking yourself if King had seasetone or whatever, ask yourself why Oda drew Greenbull shitting on them effortlessly after Sanji and Zoro struggled so much against them
That's not the point. We've never once ever seen attacks used without it being done the normal way. This is like saying 2 sword style is the same as one sword style cause zoro can still attack with the other hand.
It's a logical fallacy that doesn't make sense. You're only using this narrative to support your agenda.
If the attacks not done the same way then it's not the same attack. You can't just change how the attack works. It's a flame sword attack. Your agenda doesn't bend the rules set and followed by every other precedent before it. Which in this situation would be the attacks.
It's a logical fallacy that doesn't make sense. You're only using this narrative to support your agenda.
If the attacks not done the same way then it's not the same attack. You can't just change how the attack works. It's a flame sword attack. Your agenda doesn't bend the rules set and followed by every other precedent before it. Which in this situation would be the attacks.
