Evolution doesn't say that a rat became "horse,monkey, human, lion, wolf, rabbit and bear". You're legit portraying it like a Pokémon-esque evolution.
Beneficial mutations exist and you can find many of them in current humans (barely existed for 200 thousand years), let alone other animals throughout hundreds of millions of years of change.
"Where those links inbetween mutation 1 and mutation 99?" is only bullshit mentioned by people who don't understand how evolution works. The issue with your fallacy is that, the moment someone showed you a supposed link between species 1 and species 3 in species 2, you'd be demanding where's species 1.5; and the moment you were shown species 1.5 you'd demand species 1.25; and so on. Because, again, you think between Charmander and Charizar there was a Charmeleon once.
Beneficial mutations exist and you can find many of them in current humans (barely existed for 200 thousand years), let alone other animals throughout hundreds of millions of years of change.
"Where those links inbetween mutation 1 and mutation 99?" is only bullshit mentioned by people who don't understand how evolution works. The issue with your fallacy is that, the moment someone showed you a supposed link between species 1 and species 3 in species 2, you'd be demanding where's species 1.5; and the moment you were shown species 1.5 you'd demand species 1.25; and so on. Because, again, you think between Charmander and Charizar there was a Charmeleon once.
Let's see what means evolution:
Biological evolution (from Latin evolutio — "expansion") — a natural process of the development of living nature, accompanied by a change in the genetic composition of populations, the formation of adaptations, the speciation and extinction of species, the transformation of ecosystems and the biosphere as a whole.
Now, evolution doesn't mean something like pokemon, which is clear truth.
But because of your ignorance, you may believe that there is not much difference between a cat and a dog, even though they are completely different types of animals. And this is not about Pokemon, but about the real world.
I said that mutations are both good and bad. I will not go into the depths of human mutations because genetics is not a science that can determine the date and time when a certain change occurred.
Therefore, let's dwell on the issue that you raised: the existence of transitional links that evolve into something else. So, I will explain to those who do not understand: the Cro-Magnon was initially considered a transitional link, until they found evidence that the Cro-Magnon is no different from a modern person. The reason why the Cro-Magnon is depicted as an ape in the books for stupid people is that it is customary to believe in evolution. And if you take an orangutan, the ignorant will not notice too much difference between them and a person, hence the belief that people descended from a monkey came from. But the devil is in the details. The difference between an orangutan and a human is enormous.
However, I'm not talking here only about people, I'm talking about animals: there is no transitional link between species, or it has not been found. And evolution claims that such must exist. Moreover, due to the fact that only some mutations can be positive, there must be hundreds of thousands of subspecies that disappeared without completing their evolution. Animals cannot take and turn into something else. Believe it or not, each animal has its own mechanisms, its own system of behavior, its own instincts. Mutations are not selective - they are always spontaneous. At the same time, each animal is a complex living organism that does not need anything. Evolution says that due to poor conditions, animals can change completely, which implies the existence of transitional links and incomplete mutations. And there is no such thing.
In summary, evolution is the belief that all life on earth was formed from a rat. There is no evidence for this.
And don't call other people dumb when you post this.