Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? i refuse to pay my taxes is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real men pay taxes tax is the best thing ever happened to us taxes are beautiful trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you
Hard, because you can't take them all at the same time from their home. And it's usually as follows.
Rioters are hiding within a mob. Mob exist because of protest. Protest happen on a pre-designed street.
Here is a very controversial map of Paris with multiple places of power.
In gray, you can see the usual authorized protests. In yellow, the UNauthorized yellow vest protests and riots.
I'll let you draw your own conclusions.
Rioters are hiding within a mob. Mob exist because of protest. Protest happen on a pre-designed street.
Here is a very controversial map of Paris with multiple places of power.
In gray, you can see the usual authorized protests. In yellow, the UNauthorized yellow vest protests and riots.
I'll let you draw your own conclusions.
oh my dear piss poor pathetic existence if you've the slightest idea of what you're trying to justify here then you should dig a hole and hide in it out of shame
you're an absolute clown for thinking whatever you say is correct
violence over normal people won't do a damm to big shots
if you've the freaking guts then go riot on their properties
otherwise shut the hell up and sleep hugging your rabbit body pillow
you're an absolute clown for thinking whatever you say is correct
violence over normal people won't do a damm to big shots
if you've the freaking guts then go riot on their properties
otherwise shut the hell up and sleep hugging your rabbit body pillow
You are just highlighting that you don't know how to read because...
You see.. That's always the same problem with you guys. You fail to see the LITTLE detail in my argumentation that make it take sence. In that instance its that no. I will never advocate for violence against people, but against OBJECTS AND BUILDINGS.
We are indeed not in the middle age, so taking the head of X leader is out of the question. But we can take down the place where they work.
Who is advocating for violence over normal people here? Do you really read what is written or do you just pass rapidely your mouse over a post to go straight up for typing ?
You are the one decouncing violence yet.. Look how violent your post is...
Same things as always. The moral panics are taking over your heads..
Not okay, "sometimes necessary".
You see.. That's always the same problem with you guys. You fail to see the LITTLE detail in my argumentation that make it take sence. In that instance its that no. I will never advocate for violence against people, but against OBJECTS AND BUILDINGS.
We are indeed not in the middle age, so taking the head of X leader is out of the question. But we can take down the place where they work.
Who is advocating for violence over normal people here? Do you really read what is written or do you just pass rapidely your mouse over a post to go straight up for typing ?
You are the one decouncing violence yet.. Look how violent your post is...
Same things as always. The moral panics are taking over your heads..
Post automatically merged:
Rioting and looting is okay 
You are just highlighting that you don't know how to read because...
You see.. That's always the same problem with you guys. You fail to see the LITTLE detail in my argumentation that make it take sence. In that instance its that no. I will never advocate for violence against people, but against OBJECTS AND BUILDINGS.
We are indeed not in the middle age, so taking the head of X leader is out of the question. But we can take down the place where they work.
Who is advocating for violence over normal people here? Do you really read what is written or do you just pass rapidely your mouse over a post to go straight up for typing ?
You are the one decouncing violence yet.. Look how violent your post is...
Same things as always. The moral panics are taking over your heads..
Not okay, "sometimes necessary".
You see.. That's always the same problem with you guys. You fail to see the LITTLE detail in my argumentation that make it take sence. In that instance its that no. I will never advocate for violence against people, but against OBJECTS AND BUILDINGS.
We are indeed not in the middle age, so taking the head of X leader is out of the question. But we can take down the place where they work.
Who is advocating for violence over normal people here? Do you really read what is written or do you just pass rapidely your mouse over a post to go straight up for typing ?
You are the one decouncing violence yet.. Look how violent your post is...
Same things as always. The moral panics are taking over your heads..
Post automatically merged:
Not okay, "sometimes necessary".
otherwise shut your freaking mouth that can only say piss poor shits