It was many a growing teenager's goal to become a digital artist while spending half of their days in a discord server trying to solicit nude pics because that's the only way people like that could get some.

The days of an artist's career developing into something respectable over time may be pretty much at an end now...
:kayneshrug::beckmoji:
 
When real life fails you over and over constantly, you tend to welcome the existence and the presence of AI in your daily basis.

But what I'd like to see how the existence of programs like Chat GPT affects the lives of kids pursuing education. Chat GPT seems to answer questions related to school subjects (even math) just fine as long as the user feeds it enough information into the initial question needing to be asked.

"Can you summarize and condense this chapter of a textbook into notes for study please?"

"Any suggestions on how to solve this math problem that I am stuck on?"
Back in day,we used google to just cheat our homework by copy and pasting from wikipedia.So its nothing new actually.
 

Daniel

Don't mind the name tag
‎‎‎‎
Back in day,we used google to just cheat our homework by copy and pasting from wikipedia.So its nothing new actually.
ChatGPT is surprisingly better at that method, especially for math and physics questions where you'd need a separate answer key with solved problems for. Teachers tend to know when someone copied their answers from Google/Wikipedia or not most of the time anyways.
 
Its not about stopping technology, its about using it with care for others. When we talk about thousand and thousands of people losing their job and revenues because of the greedyness of ones, the saying "technology is unstoppable" is irrecevable.
The industry has the right to develop tech to cut costs with workers.
 
The industry has the right to develop tech to cut costs with workers.
And your sentence right there is why I know you are far on the right and me on the left. Your sentence shows no empathy for the worker.

The thing is, the industry is made in a way that ALWAYS benefit the industry and not the creator. Meaning that of course, the industry can do whatever, but this wouldn't be moral or ethic in anyway as it would take hostage thousands of workers?

Without mentionning that in the department of creativity, AI are based on the work of the CREATORS. So using those tools would be straight up steeling.

Imagine if I said to you that Amazon has the right to develop today the technology to do all the work of the current worker and therefore can fire them all tomorrow .. nice, right ? Ethical, right ?

The fact that something is possible doesn't mean you should do it. With great power comes great responsibilities.


ChatGPT is surprisingly better at that method, especially for math and physics questions where you'd need a separate answer key with solved problems for. Teachers tend to know when someone copied their answers from Google/Wikipedia or not most of the time anyways.
Careful, chat GPT is a very bad tool for knowledge. The model of the AI is based on prediction of sentences. So, you stay aware of that lol. That said, its very cool as a tool to correct grammar or enhence sentences.


This isn’t inherently a bad thing.

If it takes less artist to create movies. Then that means indie creators will have an easier time creating films that can rival big studios.
You think the tool used by big production will be available for smaller ones ? That's optimistic. But even then, we need to understand that AI art doesn't mean good art. What I'm denouncing here is not the AI itself, its the usage and compagny who are willing to cut ties with thousands of workers and therefore create a gap in the industry.

But they will quickly learn that AI for art doesn't come out of nowhere. Without the work of creators and professionnal AI are just very bland tools. The work of an AI is highly recognizable all the more when its based on the stealing of preexisting artist.

Meaning that by actually wanting to gain more time and money, CEO of those production will end up in front of a wall. But in the meantime, people will suffer.
 

Daniel

Don't mind the name tag
‎‎‎‎
AI should be used as a tool to assist the animation process, not replace the animator.
Will it really assist the animation process without sacrificing aesthetical quality though?

Not an animator here though so it is hard for me to comprehend how an animation created via assistance from tools powered by AI would look like.
Maybe that darned Ichigo vs Naruto video on Youtube that got thrown into the trash will be animated someday with the power of our AI overlords
 
Top