Yes?
But culturally, the roman shamed the passive gays. Which is not as today. It is even worse than hating gays. Is basically dehumanising passive men.
Are you slow? Can you understand what other people write?
[automerge]1701526779[/automerge]

Yeah but culturally is not the same as saying "rome was hella gay".
If you were passive you were an half man, completely shamed.
So you are saying the active gays shamed passive gays and therefore they weren't gay?:nicagesmile:
 
Hot take:all rapists that rape men are gay.
[automerge]1701527338[/automerge]
?
I am saying that they did not even considered a word for being gay .
You were either a man who gives it to women or lesser men, or an half man who takes it.
They didn't have that word,its an English word. Still gay as fuck and in denial lmfao. Look up Spartan culture. That 300 movie was full of shit.
 
Hot take:all rapists that rape men are gay.
[automerge]1701527338[/automerge]

They didn't have that word,its an English word. Still gay as fuck and in denial lmfao. Look up Spartan culture. That 300 movie was full of shit.
Spartans had a soulmate basically.
And again, you guys are obsessed with gender politics.
The claim was that romans where gay, as in gay like today.
They were not, they were a hierarchical society were lesser men were fucked in the ass by "better" man.
This is not what homosexuality is considered today.
Unless you guys are saying that bottoms are less men.
 
Spartans had a soulmate basically.
And again, you guys are obsessed with gender politics.
The claim was that romans where gay, as in gay like today.
They were not, they were a hierarchical society were lesser men were fucked in the ass by "better" man.
This is not what homosexuality is considered today.
Unless you guys are saying that bottoms are less men.
I didn't say they were "gay as fuck",Adam did it.Still more common that people would imagine.Gay was never the standard,but it was always a thing.
[automerge]1701527860[/automerge]
I googled that.yeah,such men are gay too.
 
But i am bisexual so you wouldn't be wrong lul

You can justify it as much as you want, it is gay af what they did
I am not saying they were not gay. But at this point you are so up your tree that it useless.

The way they were gay was nothing like today by any standard.
Men are not less human because they take up their ass, nor we have slaves to fuck.
 
Spartans had a soulmate basically.
And again, you guys are obsessed with gender politics.
The claim was that romans where gay, as in gay like today.
They were not, they were a hierarchical society were lesser men were fucked in the ass by "better" man.
This is not what homosexuality is considered today.
Unless you guys are saying that bottoms are less men.
Sexual relationships with same sex partners=homosexual=gay roman=gay like today.
 
I am not saying they were not gay. But at this point you are so up your tree that it useless.

The way they were gay was nothing like today by any standard.
Men are not less human because they take up their ass, nor we have slaves to fuck.
They perceived sexuality different from us,but they still had same sex relationships like people do today.
 
Top