Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Cmon AL it only takes about 2 minutes lol
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/for...w-members-and-the-grand-fleet.79/post-2607295
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/for...w-members-and-the-grand-fleet.79/post-2607295
. I don't know what you don't understand here
Post automatically merged:
it wouldnt at all. if you had proper reading comprehension that is. . . . or cared about logic.
Post automatically merged:
yep you cant read. no surprise there
Post automatically merged:
ironically enough i use gender as meaning gender identity. so you didnt get anything from our discussion on that one either. . .
congrats!
Post automatically merged:
yeah idk but thats just not what im saying. so either you suck at reading, love strawmanning me, or i dont even know.
thats what i initially posted. i literally say i agree with various ideologies. and then i clarified later on that i judge shit on a case by case basis. i just dont submit to any ideological category, because i dont care to put myself into any of these categories. doenst mean i am neutral or apolitical. and i vote centre/left/environmental political parties. so yeah im not right wing, you are just a disinguous (or retarded) nutjob.
Post automatically merged:
and where the fuck did i say im not caring?!?
seriously, stop making shit up.
Post automatically merged:
great idea, i'll do the same in public transportation vehicles
Last edited:
And what are those posts supposed to prove exactly ?
I asked for quote where I call AL sexist and you guys are giving me posts where I talk about the fact that AL don't see sexism...
Do you see the problem or do I have to draw it for you here ?
Desinformation as always:
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/...did-not-found-kkk-start-civil-war/3253803001/
Also, democrats are not leftist.
Use your brain for once. If it is being "pushed", how can it be the status co ?
Also you are still ignoring to answer to this question:
If feminists are the status co. Why are feminists trying to change the system to give more equal right sand more priviledges for women ?
I think you are doing everything to avoid admitting that you are wrong.
Again, you are just saying "you are wrong" without even explaining why. In reality you know I'm not and you simply can't answer. >>
You said that you are not subscribing to any ideologies (which means that you don't subscribe to any values or value system)
Then
You said that you can occasionnaly take a side sometimes (which means that you would actually use real value and ideologies sometimes)
You therefore contradicted yourself. And its ok I don't really care about that as long as you understand that being neutral is just favorizing the oppressors.
Since you have reading problem...
I said : New atheism is aiming to extend the concept of science to a form of reorganization of society (that can be made for example by acting on the different faith in society through the push of science and rationnal reasonning) and I said that its also a criticized and problematic movement.
You basically said : No
Here is what is written on wiki:
"New Atheism advocates the view that superstition, religion, and irrationalism should not simply be tolerated. Instead, they advocate the antitheist view that the various forms of theism should be criticised, countered, examined, and challenged by rational argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics"
I will now let everyone judge who is right and who is wrong here.
No. When I say "gender", I mean "Gender". Its you who understand "gender identity". Learn to read.
Its you who talked about identifying to an ideology, not me.
"I don't subscribe to any one ideology myself". Thus contradicting this precise sentence. You said two opposite thing in the same sentence.
Maybe you meant "I don't subscribe to a single ideology" but that not what you wrote. Sorry. I interprate only what you write, not what you are meaning to write.
Also, the problem doesn't come when you subscribe to multiple ideologies, for example I do. The problem comes when you subscribe to contradicting ideologies. For example : Someone being anti woke while saying that they are defending people under oppression would be contradicting themselves.
Some values are not compatible. And the reality is : Rightist values overall are not compatible with leftist values.
A value IS an ideological category, not subscribing to any ideological categories means that you don't have any values. And since its impossible to have any values you will necessaraly subscribe to some ideological categories.
Nothing surprising here. Center-left-environmental parties are usually socioliberal parties/straight up liberals parties. Those parties are not really leftist, they are mainly liberals and often antiscientific (but hey, maybe its different where you live, I hope for you sake anyway)
I don't remember saying you are not caring...
>>>>>
I asked for quote where I call AL sexist and you guys are giving me posts where I talk about the fact that AL don't see sexism...
Do you see the problem or do I have to draw it for you here ?
Desinformation as always:
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/...did-not-found-kkk-start-civil-war/3253803001/
Also, democrats are not leftist.
Use your brain for once. If it is being "pushed", how can it be the status co ?
Also you are still ignoring to answer to this question:
If feminists are the status co. Why are feminists trying to change the system to give more equal right sand more priviledges for women ?
I think you are doing everything to avoid admitting that you are wrong.
Again, you are just saying "you are wrong" without even explaining why. In reality you know I'm not and you simply can't answer. >>
You said that you are not subscribing to any ideologies (which means that you don't subscribe to any values or value system)
Then
You said that you can occasionnaly take a side sometimes (which means that you would actually use real value and ideologies sometimes)
You therefore contradicted yourself. And its ok I don't really care about that as long as you understand that being neutral is just favorizing the oppressors.
Since you have reading problem...
I said : New atheism is aiming to extend the concept of science to a form of reorganization of society (that can be made for example by acting on the different faith in society through the push of science and rationnal reasonning) and I said that its also a criticized and problematic movement.
You basically said : No
Here is what is written on wiki:
"New Atheism advocates the view that superstition, religion, and irrationalism should not simply be tolerated. Instead, they advocate the antitheist view that the various forms of theism should be criticised, countered, examined, and challenged by rational argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics"
I will now let everyone judge who is right and who is wrong here.
No. When I say "gender", I mean "Gender". Its you who understand "gender identity". Learn to read.
Its you who talked about identifying to an ideology, not me.
"I don't subscribe to any one ideology myself". Thus contradicting this precise sentence. You said two opposite thing in the same sentence.
Maybe you meant "I don't subscribe to a single ideology" but that not what you wrote. Sorry. I interprate only what you write, not what you are meaning to write.
Also, the problem doesn't come when you subscribe to multiple ideologies, for example I do. The problem comes when you subscribe to contradicting ideologies. For example : Someone being anti woke while saying that they are defending people under oppression would be contradicting themselves.
Some values are not compatible. And the reality is : Rightist values overall are not compatible with leftist values.
A value IS an ideological category, not subscribing to any ideological categories means that you don't have any values. And since its impossible to have any values you will necessaraly subscribe to some ideological categories.
Nothing surprising here. Center-left-environmental parties are usually socioliberal parties/straight up liberals parties. Those parties are not really leftist, they are mainly liberals and often antiscientific (but hey, maybe its different where you live, I hope for you sake anyway)
I don't remember saying you are not caring...
>>>>>
me not subscribing to a single ideology(!) is nowhere close to me not subscribing to values?!
seriously, antilogical drivel all the way with you.
yes, i take sides on a case by case basis, so not "sometimes" either.
you really suck at reading. maybe this is a language barrier thing. or maybe this has something to do with you not using words according to their actual definitions.
either way, you are wrong.
i also mean gender. but the definition based on gender identity as opposed to gender roles. or how do you define "gender"?
apparently none of the multiple dictionary definitions? lmfao
lmfao. the first paragraph says new atheism is about criticising religion if it exerts influence on society, such as government and politics. that doesnt mean new atheism is about reorganizing society based on science.
yes, let everyone judge lmfao
how is "any one ideology" or "a single ideology" any different?
its really the same thing lmfao.
and well i did in the course of our discussion use that phrasing here for example
IDEOLOGY Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com
*yawn*
Not gonna lie, this disturbing level of dishonesty is low-key worse than @Bob74h saying we need to force every woman to be married off.
emphasis on "parties" in my last post. we dont necessarily vote a single party here in germany.
so i didnt say that the party i vote is centre-left-environmental. thats just the range of parties that i consider voting. from center to left to environmental.
Version 2:
Version 3
Version 4:
Version 5:
Final Version:
all accurate as fuck
seriously, antilogical drivel all the way with you.
yes, i take sides on a case by case basis, so not "sometimes" either.
you really suck at reading. maybe this is a language barrier thing. or maybe this has something to do with you not using words according to their actual definitions.
either way, you are wrong.
Post automatically merged:
i also mean gender. but the definition based on gender identity as opposed to gender roles. or how do you define "gender"?
apparently none of the multiple dictionary definitions? lmfao
Post automatically merged:
lmfao. the first paragraph says new atheism is about criticising religion if it exerts influence on society, such as government and politics. that doesnt mean new atheism is about reorganizing society based on science.
yes, let everyone judge lmfao
Post automatically merged:
how is "any one ideology" or "a single ideology" any different?
its really the same thing lmfao.
and well i did in the course of our discussion use that phrasing here for example
Post automatically merged:
IDEOLOGY Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com
*yawn*
Post automatically merged:
I don't remember saying you are not caring...
>>>>>
>>>>>
Post automatically merged:
emphasis on "parties" in my last post. we dont necessarily vote a single party here in germany.
so i didnt say that the party i vote is centre-left-environmental. thats just the range of parties that i consider voting. from center to left to environmental.
Post automatically merged:
Version 2:
Last edited: