Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
Where am I wrong ?
You consider that because I'm telling you that we have progress, I do not know that progress is not a linear thing. But you do not even realize the amount of resistance I'm trying to create here precisely because because I know that it's not the case.
Why are you not connecting the dots ? You are underestimating me a great deal..
You consider that because I'm telling you that we have progress, I do not know that progress is not a linear thing. But you do not even realize the amount of resistance I'm trying to create here precisely because because I know that it's not the case.
Why are you not connecting the dots ? You are underestimating me a great deal..
I don’t know how twitter’s moderation works
but I would assume they’d probably hire indian mods to moderate content coming from India
Even with AI and translate, I’d imagine you’d prefer a mod who speaks the various languages spoken in India. Also Indian mods are probably really cheap to buy.
In any case, it’s likely the people modding Indian Twitter are hindutva bros.
Also even for non india Twitter
it’s possible Hindu Indians are over represented in the mod team because again, they’re cheaper to hire
This looks insane. Idk what the common Indian opinion of this is, but I’d be calling for the president to step down if something like this happened in America.
Why hasn’t the Indian military protected these people?
but I would assume they’d probably hire indian mods to moderate content coming from India
Even with AI and translate, I’d imagine you’d prefer a mod who speaks the various languages spoken in India. Also Indian mods are probably really cheap to buy.
In any case, it’s likely the people modding Indian Twitter are hindutva bros.
Post automatically merged:
Also even for non india Twitter
it’s possible Hindu Indians are over represented in the mod team because again, they’re cheaper to hire
Post automatically merged:
This looks insane. Idk what the common Indian opinion of this is, but I’d be calling for the president to step down if something like this happened in America.
Why hasn’t the Indian military protected these people?
Last edited:
https://corbettreport.com/911-suspects-dancing-israelis/
I think about this a lot.
20 more years of war...
...for this.
Screw hell, only the rabid plasma of angry stars can burn away and purify this level of evil.
I think about this a lot.
20 more years of war...
...for this.
Screw hell, only the rabid plasma of angry stars can burn away and purify this level of evil.
I have a question for people who have been questionning what I said in the last two days, because I'm starting to wonder about something:
If you had to choose between:
- Our current system, no change, oppressions and a violent society, but prisonners get to be punished - sometimes harshly - for their crimes.
&
- A new system, big structural changes, no oppression and when there are rare cases of violence, the victimes are highly compensated and the system transforms the perpetuator into a force for good through change without punishing them.
Which one would you prefer ?
If you had to choose between:
- Our current system, no change, oppressions and a violent society, but prisonners get to be punished - sometimes harshly - for their crimes.
&
- A new system, big structural changes, no oppression and when there are rare cases of violence, the victimes are highly compensated and the system transforms the perpetuator into a force for good through change without punishing them.
Which one would you prefer ?
Last edited:
The owner and many more who were "absent" definitely knew what was happening, if not in on it.
I pray someday the people of Israel realize their government has sold them out the same way my government did its people.
Also, here's the UK updating their airspace over the drones:
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/government-places-drone-restrictions-over-11-military-sites/
I pray someday the people of Israel realize their government has sold them out the same way my government did its people.
Also, here's the UK updating their airspace over the drones:
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/government-places-drone-restrictions-over-11-military-sites/
Yeah, I wonder why people keep using the dictionary against you, maybe it has to do with you making irrelevant distinctions that do nothing but waste fucking time. The word ethics cannot be defined without referencing morals
Fetuses are living. If you define their having humanity as being a part of the species, they are a part of humanity from conception
This is because fetuses are a fetus of the human type, as opposed to being an elephant fetus, or a dog fetus. Hence we would call a fetus created from a human as a human-fetus, because it is a human
What potential does a fetus have for good that an old woman doesn't have? Both are human as I have just demonstrated.
You could argue a fetus innately has more potential good left as it has more of it's life ahead of it, but that is a seperate argument really
An rapist choosing to protect a woman rather than raping her is a radical change, a radical change of his will towards good rather than evil.
It is a radical change because it is a radical decision; the decision is the cause for the change. What you are finding with all of these arguments and what I have noticed in general is your inability to parse proper distinctions between things. A decision is the cause of change in this context
How does this hypothetical prove we don't have free will? In this hypothetical I have all the power to choose not to press the button if I didn't want to.
Not really sure what your point is lmao. Radical "change" in the sense of changing my ideology can happen instantly, I could instantly go from a fascist to a radical leftist in one sitting if I thought about it and decided to.
You should really give up this argument. It's an uphill battle and you are going in circles finding contradictions which do not really exist.
An extreme change in this context is just, at the end of the day, reducible to his will choosing good rather than evil.
So long as the will is properly informed by the intellect, it will move towards good/evil, just as a fireplace will burn if given wood.
Jack took 3 movies to have proper realizations (fireplace given wood) , so it took 3 movies for him to choose good (fireplace burning).
But, he could have chosen good immediately if given immediate understanding, just as a fireplace can instantly burn brightly if given lots of wood all at once rather than little twigs over a span of days.
So to, a criminal can make instant radical change if given instant radical understanding; instant repentance if he instantly is told & realizes his crimes warrant execution
A better discussion to have is how likely a criminal will instantly desire good after being threatened, because it is fundamentally possible as per the nature of the intellect & the will.
This just in: citizens disagree with Trump planning to import millions from the third-world into the country
Stop noticing.
Fetuses are living. If you define their having humanity as being a part of the species, they are a part of humanity from conception
This is because fetuses are a fetus of the human type, as opposed to being an elephant fetus, or a dog fetus. Hence we would call a fetus created from a human as a human-fetus, because it is a human
What potential does a fetus have for good that an old woman doesn't have? Both are human as I have just demonstrated.
You could argue a fetus innately has more potential good left as it has more of it's life ahead of it, but that is a seperate argument really
An rapist choosing to protect a woman rather than raping her is a radical change, a radical change of his will towards good rather than evil.
It is a radical change because it is a radical decision; the decision is the cause for the change. What you are finding with all of these arguments and what I have noticed in general is your inability to parse proper distinctions between things. A decision is the cause of change in this context
How does this hypothetical prove we don't have free will? In this hypothetical I have all the power to choose not to press the button if I didn't want to.
Not really sure what your point is lmao. Radical "change" in the sense of changing my ideology can happen instantly, I could instantly go from a fascist to a radical leftist in one sitting if I thought about it and decided to.
You should really give up this argument. It's an uphill battle and you are going in circles finding contradictions which do not really exist.
An extreme change in this context is just, at the end of the day, reducible to his will choosing good rather than evil.
So long as the will is properly informed by the intellect, it will move towards good/evil, just as a fireplace will burn if given wood.
Jack took 3 movies to have proper realizations (fireplace given wood) , so it took 3 movies for him to choose good (fireplace burning).
But, he could have chosen good immediately if given immediate understanding, just as a fireplace can instantly burn brightly if given lots of wood all at once rather than little twigs over a span of days.
So to, a criminal can make instant radical change if given instant radical understanding; instant repentance if he instantly is told & realizes his crimes warrant execution
A better discussion to have is how likely a criminal will instantly desire good after being threatened, because it is fundamentally possible as per the nature of the intellect & the will.
Post automatically merged:
This just in: citizens disagree with Trump planning to import millions from the third-world into the country
Stop noticing.
Idk what kinda site.that is BUT I do believe that the US knew of the imminent attack and allowed it to happen in order to make use of it eg tighter surveillance, islamophobia etc
Likewise, the recent Christmas market attack in Germany was allowed to happen in order to increase islamophobia, xenophobia influencing the upcoming elections, further dividing the country and potentially to scare the population so much they will not only agree to but actively ask for more surveillance: the suspect had been threatening a terror attack for years on social media, had even been on the radar, committed crimes before and on the day of the attack, the polica car that was supposed to be near the entrance of the Christmas market was conveniently not where it should have been.
The ultimate goal of all this deceit: to basically scare the people into submission and make them vote for authoritarian leaders, denouncing democracy as unsafe and ultimately leading into a dictatorship.
Likewise, the recent Christmas market attack in Germany was allowed to happen in order to increase islamophobia, xenophobia influencing the upcoming elections, further dividing the country and potentially to scare the population so much they will not only agree to but actively ask for more surveillance: the suspect had been threatening a terror attack for years on social media, had even been on the radar, committed crimes before and on the day of the attack, the polica car that was supposed to be near the entrance of the Christmas market was conveniently not where it should have been.
The ultimate goal of all this deceit: to basically scare the people into submission and make them vote for authoritarian leaders, denouncing democracy as unsafe and ultimately leading into a dictatorship.