Meaningless deaths..?

It was not meaningless. They died for what was right. They were brave.
What they died for was right and it was brave, but

it didn’t stop the Holocaust, nor did it stop the regime.

I think there is something admirable about those who die for an ideal. But also I think the concept of martyrdom is quite toxic. There is an element of foolishness in it that I think society fails to realize.

human life is very important and people shouldn’t give it up, nor encourage others to give it up, lightly.

Ultimately life is complicated. There are times when one must fight and there are times it’s better not too. Personally I’d be extremely hesitant to throw my life away if I wasn’t certain it would make a significant difference.
Post automatically merged:

Insurgents fought Nazis all over Europe. Look up French and Polish resistance.
perhaps those people had a bigger impact, haven’t read too much about them

but in school I did read about the German college students who handed out anti-nazi pamphlets and got executed for it

there cause was righteous and it is good society honors people such as that, to uphold the values they died for

I suppose that is the meaning of their death. So they can be an example of virtue or something.

but I just really struggle with the idea of people throwing away their lives on whims like that. People shouldn’t be dispensable like that.
Post automatically merged:

If you are an american you must defend the staple of its constitution, otherwise what's the point of being one?

Saying "I was born in america I did not swear an oath" sounds disingenous. It's the ultimate escapism. Being part of a culture and having a nationality should mean something, sharing a culture and common ideals. Otherwise you just reinforce the stereotype of the immigrate that comes only for the money.
Perhaps there will come a day and time I will need to fight for my nation. I cannot say what I would do then, but I hope I do the right thing, whatever that might be.

What I can say, is that time is surely not now.
 
Last edited:
Like i understand some real deranged people write here, but flexing of being an immigrant proud of not caring about the culture that hosts you and faster you is insane
We should all care for the well being of each other. I’m not proud to be an American or Colombian, I don’t think nationality is something to be proud of. But I do care about these places and want what’s best for them. Same goes to the rest of the world.
 
Probably not…like I said, it’s not just a financial matter; I don’t think I have it in me to be a good father, and I’d rather not bring a child into the world if I can’t give it the life it deserves :hapnoel:
Ok, i respect that.
What they died for was right and it was brave, but

it didn’t stop the Holocaust, nor did it stop the regime.

I think there is something admirable about those who die for an ideal. But also I think the concept of martyrdom is quite toxic. There is an element of foolishness in it that I think society fails to realize.

human life is very important and people shouldn’t give it up, nor encourage others to give it up, lightly.

Ultimately life is complicated. There are times when one must fight and there are times it’s better not too. Personally I’d be extremely hesitant to throw my life away if I wasn’t certain it would make a significant difference.
Post automatically merged:


perhaps those people had a bigger impact, haven’t read too much about them

but in school I did read about the German college students who handed out anti-nazi pamphlets and got executed for it

there cause was righteous and it is good society honors people such as that, to uphold the values they died for

I suppose that is the meaning of their death. So they can be an example of virtue or something.

but I just really struggle with the idea of people throwing away their lives on whims like that. People shouldn’t be dispensable like that.
You realize there are smarter ways to be useful in such a scenario, right? There were people literally infiltrating concentration camps to scout things in there.
 
Probably not…like I said, it’s not just a financial matter; I don’t think I have it in me to be a good father, and I’d rather not bring a child into the world if I can’t give it the life it deserves :hapnoel:
My wife really wants kids, but even she’s having second thoughts with everything that’s happening. Well probably give it a go when we’re closer to 40
 
We should all care for the well being of each other. I’m not proud to be an American or Colombian, I don’t think nationality is something to be proud of. But I do care about these places and want what’s best for them. Same goes to the rest of the world.
I believe that an immigrant has more duties than a natural born citisen, starting from the fact that the citizen is part of a culture that immigrant want to be part of, so as a starting point the immigrant owes to the country that hosts me.
I find repugnant immigrating and spitting on the values that allowed you to built your life, and extremely entitled.
Post automatically merged:

My wife really wants kids, but even she’s having second thoughts with everything that’s happening. Well probably give it a go when we’re closer to 40
Do it now man, the later the more issues you can have.
 
I believe that an immigrant has more duties than a natural born citisen, starting from the fact that the citizen is part of a culture that immigrant want to be part of, so as a starting point the immigrant owes to the country that hosts me.
I find repugnant immigrating and spitting on the values that allowed you to built your life, and extremely entitled.
It’s a nuanced subject. Do you believe you should become an atheist if you move to a country like Japan? You should respect culture and traditions, and never impose your traditions on your host country.

idk where you’re from but on this side of the world, most of us aren’t native to these lands. America is a mishmash of cultures and it will continue to absorb different traditions in the future. Same goes to almost every country in this continent. It was not that big of an issue for me in the first place since my culture and values have always been “western” in nature.
 
It’s a nuanced subject. Do you believe you should become an atheist if you move to a country like Japan? You should respect culture and traditions, and never impose your traditions on your host country.

idk where you’re from but on this side of the world, most of us aren’t native to these lands. America is a mishmash of cultures and it will continue to absorb different traditions in the future. Same goes to almost every country in this continent. It was not that big of an issue for me in the first place since my culture and values have always been “western” in nature.
I prefer not to dox myself, sorry if it's a bit psychotic.
Let's say I am from EU.
Most us immigrants come from community that share the same catolic/cristian set of values, the modern crisis of the clash of cultures is a first seen phenomenon on this scale.
Now we have people with culture clashing orthogonal with each other and no shared set of values living together, and we pretend that diversity is strength, when community are vanishing and everyone is more isolated than ever.
Just 500 years ago there were religion wars in Europe, imagine.
 
catolic/cristian set of values
You mean Roman values those perverted cunts

Now we have people with culture clashing orthogonal with each other and no shared set of values living together
We never truly had this, imperial religions might have mislead you and others into thinking the nations of Europe have more in common than they do not but this has always been superficial
 
You mean Roman values those perverted cunts


We never truly had this, imperial religions might have mislead you and others into thinking the nations of Europe have more in common than they do not but this has always been superficial
Within the same nations take England, the set of values was shared.
We have countries like Italy or Germany that have no cohesion because they have been created only in the last 200 years and for centuries had different cultures, but at the same time religion was practically the same, along with the core values.
Sounds a bit shitty to say, but all europe participated to crusades, despite countries being at war with each other a few years later over protestant vs catholics.
 
religion was practically the same, along with the core values.
Forced onto people, superficial.
Once the church lost most of their political power, see how the people abandoned these institutions 😂
Now everybody can openly talk about priests abusing children and nuns, embezzlement and grotesque wasting of funds, brainwashing believers into giving their hard earned money to the church to save their souls as well as those of already deceases family members from hell and using it to build lavish pompous cathedrals;and the century long spiritual and psychological abuse the church used to control everyone.
Common values my rear😂
All we had in common was our abuser
 
Forced onto people, superficial.
Once the church lost most of their political power, see how the people abandoned these institutions 😂
Now everybody can openly talk about priests abusing children and nuns, embezzlement and grotesque wasting of funds, brainwashing believers into giving their hard earned money to the church to save their souls as well as those of already deceases family members from hell and using it to build lavish pompous cathedrals;and the century long spiritual and psychological abuse the church used to control everyone.
Common values my rear😂
All we had in common was our abuser
Calling church the abuser when it was the only institution that preserved Greek and Roman literature is a strange take.
History is history, there are no simple roles in describing 1000 years after a millenary empire fell.
The same way you say the church "abused" we could argue roman abused the whole continent, but they also brought fresh water and roads and laws.
Saying that the contribution of Catholic church is a net negative is for me wrong, but I understand that's a complicated topic.
Just saying that without the church, we would have enough lost aristoteles, plato and the origin of western culture.
 
Calling church the abuser when it was the only institution that preserved Greek and Roman literature is a strange take.
History is history, there are no simple roles in describing 1000 years after a millenary empire fell.
The same way you say the church "abused" we could argue roman abused the whole continent, but they also brought fresh water and roads and laws.
Saying that the contribution of Catholic church is a net negative is for me wrong, but I understand that's a complicated topic.
Just saying that without the church, we would have enough lost aristoteles, plato and the origin of western culture.
I get it now. You’re just like brush d teeth.
 
Top