Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Whatever you have to say to prepare yourself to go killing some libs
Anyone see any of the mask off Trumpers posting on their own social media that the war is coming and they’ll kill libs
I saw one with a guy ranting on tiktok about how Donald Trump just needs to say the word and he’s ready to start some pogroms
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ri...rks-killing-fuels-calls-vengeance-2025-09-12/
what i noticed the instant it happened was that every conservative started saying i and everyone they spoke to was wishing more political killings because we dared be a meanie to daddy Kirk. I would say no I don’t support murder, just I’m against telling young girls at women’s leadership conferences to submit to Christian men as soon as they graduate. I don’t think black women have low brainpower and stole their positions from whites like Charlie.
Why does the left have to be pro GROOMING like TPUSA pushed on the youth or I’m egging on assassins? Because the right is itching to slander all the evil lefties and take away their rights.
let’s be clear, Charlie Kirk died in the midst of deflecting from a question about the actual danger of the trans bogeyman he was lambasting. He was a propagandist, and saying that only means I didn’t like the guy. Stop jerking off about how it’s all proof that we want you dead, take a deep breath.
Anyone see any of the mask off Trumpers posting on their own social media that the war is coming and they’ll kill libs
I saw one with a guy ranting on tiktok about how Donald Trump just needs to say the word and he’s ready to start some pogroms
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ri...rks-killing-fuels-calls-vengeance-2025-09-12/
what i noticed the instant it happened was that every conservative started saying i and everyone they spoke to was wishing more political killings because we dared be a meanie to daddy Kirk. I would say no I don’t support murder, just I’m against telling young girls at women’s leadership conferences to submit to Christian men as soon as they graduate. I don’t think black women have low brainpower and stole their positions from whites like Charlie.
Why does the left have to be pro GROOMING like TPUSA pushed on the youth or I’m egging on assassins? Because the right is itching to slander all the evil lefties and take away their rights.
let’s be clear, Charlie Kirk died in the midst of deflecting from a question about the actual danger of the trans bogeyman he was lambasting. He was a propagandist, and saying that only means I didn’t like the guy. Stop jerking off about how it’s all proof that we want you dead, take a deep breath.
Last edited:
Not that it really matters, but I think this whole idea that Charlie Kirk’s killer was a right wing groyper is a massive cope.
People on Reddit keep pushing it and I legitimately don’t know why.
I was briefly in TPUSA when I was in college. There were multiple people in that group that were open white nationalists. In fact I had dudes in that club actively promoting Nick Fuentes.
Yeah his family was MAGA and maybe he might have been too at some point. But genuinely ask yourself if a person who writes “hey fascists, catch” and “Bella ciao” on bullets used to shoot Charlie Kirk actually sounds like the work of a right winger.
Ultimately it legitimately does not matter what this dude believed. But I do find it annoying how Reddit has become this circlejerk for bullshit liberal conspiracies.
People on Reddit keep pushing it and I legitimately don’t know why.
I was briefly in TPUSA when I was in college. There were multiple people in that group that were open white nationalists. In fact I had dudes in that club actively promoting Nick Fuentes.
Yeah his family was MAGA and maybe he might have been too at some point. But genuinely ask yourself if a person who writes “hey fascists, catch” and “Bella ciao” on bullets used to shoot Charlie Kirk actually sounds like the work of a right winger.
Ultimately it legitimately does not matter what this dude believed. But I do find it annoying how Reddit has become this circlejerk for bullshit liberal conspiracies.
Far rightist killing other far rightist is something that I do not understand.
Would this mean that somehow there is a point where radicalism is so strong that they see their own allies as dangerous for them?
I mean, if I take the logic of leftists who are ALWAYS screaming at each others because of the fear of reactionnarism... technically, it could be the same on the other side of the spectrum ? Right ?
Hm...
So you don't agree with Uncle Ben's sentence:
With great power, comes great responsibility ?
Would this mean that somehow there is a point where radicalism is so strong that they see their own allies as dangerous for them?
I mean, if I take the logic of leftists who are ALWAYS screaming at each others because of the fear of reactionnarism... technically, it could be the same on the other side of the spectrum ? Right ?
Hm...
So you don't agree with Uncle Ben's sentence:
With great power, comes great responsibility ?
The idea that going to college in Utah for a semester made him kill someone is even more insane and that’s what I’m seeing everywhere from the right lol
have you seen the pics of him as a kid with mounted guns and a rocket launcher? I blame U.S. gun culture. Chances are without a family and a culture that glorified guns so much it wouldn’t have happened
have you seen the pics of him as a kid with mounted guns and a rocket launcher? I blame U.S. gun culture. Chances are without a family and a culture that glorified guns so much it wouldn’t have happened
Far rightist killing other far rightist is something that I do not understand.
Would this mean that somehow there is a point where radicalism is so strong that they see their own allies as dangerous for them?
I mean, if I take the logic of leftists who are ALWAYS screaming at each others because of the fear of reactionnarism... technically, it could be the same on the other side of the spectrum ? Right ?
Hm...
So you don't agree with Uncle Ben's sentence:
With great power, comes great responsibility ?
Would this mean that somehow there is a point where radicalism is so strong that they see their own allies as dangerous for them?
I mean, if I take the logic of leftists who are ALWAYS screaming at each others because of the fear of reactionnarism... technically, it could be the same on the other side of the spectrum ? Right ?
Hm...
So you don't agree with Uncle Ben's sentence:
With great power, comes great responsibility ?
Post automatically merged:
I don't even know who that is people keep throwing this name around, but this sounds like something like flat earther would say.
Ok I will precise the thought here.
Imagine that you are in a cold desert, you are with your family of three, you, your wife and a daughter. At one point, you find a giant beast that will help you survive for far more that the entire trip out of the desert. Somehow, the giant beast is lying there, you just have to kill it.
You do that and voilà, you have a giant beast that will allow you to survive (don't mind the logistic, you have a magic bag that can contain the giant beast without being heavy)
Now..
What would you do if you find a couple, stranded, like you in the desert, starving?
Imagine that you are in a cold desert, you are with your family of three, you, your wife and a daughter. At one point, you find a giant beast that will help you survive for far more that the entire trip out of the desert. Somehow, the giant beast is lying there, you just have to kill it.
You do that and voilà, you have a giant beast that will allow you to survive (don't mind the logistic, you have a magic bag that can contain the giant beast without being heavy)
Now..
What would you do if you find a couple, stranded, like you in the desert, starving?
Yeah it is your responsability that if you can basically effortlessly rescue countless people from starvation, that you do it
Any moral system that says otherwise is trash, and if you believe that you do not have the duty to save people from that, when you can do it effortlessly, you are extremely deluded
Actual capitalism brainrot
Any moral system that says otherwise is trash, and if you believe that you do not have the duty to save people from that, when you can do it effortlessly, you are extremely deluded
Actual capitalism brainrot
"
This is very true, I have friends who live in both Canada and the UK and despite them having free healthcare, the service itself doesn't meet the needs of a lot of people and because so many people rely on it, they aren't able to service everyone in a timely manner. The issue is compounded by unattractive wages meaning its not something many people look to go into which leads to shortages of doctors and so on. Truly there no easy solutions. While I do believe its better to have these public services in some form rather than not having them at all, I don't think they should come at the expense of anyone in the bottom 99% of earners. Consider for a moment that most billionaires are horribly corrupt and built their wealth off exploiting that very same bottom 99%, do we not think it fair to ask them for their fair contribution to society? What "fair" would be defined as is subjective but I think its a good place to start.
