Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem loli real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
I disagree on that
Supporting lgbt or not would not be the same as grass is green type stuff it really ultimately depends on your outlook
some people who are naturalists will think gay is bad cause it's not natural and other people will say being gay is okay cause people should have the freedom as to act how they please
Which side you as a person take up does not ultimately deny a basic fundamental fact of the world like how grass is green or sky is blue
me personally agreeing with the more libertarian argument there rather then the naturalist one has no barring on if lgbt acceptance depends on outlook or not
a fact is that gay people exist right? a belief is that they are ok and should be accepted
denying the fact makes you delusional, denying the belief simply means you have a different outlook
That's not what was meant
What was talked about was the football team type stuff where my team always quals being right or the moral good
I dont have a immutable intrinsic belief in one poltitical party's ideology as you do
Im not going to stan and protect the right if they do something im to dislike eg corruption,pedohipia or whatever as goes for the left as really have no biases for them as groups maybe you can say im more aligned with them on a issue to issue basis but that's not the same as me being on their team 100% right?
I think that's the perception as alot of the people will condemn things like the george flyod riots for the damages and kinda just violence present
and that kinda gives the view to you that they lean right but on the same issues like captiol riot such a event would also be condemed
There's other examples like how people handle bias as a argument, it's often again condemned on both sides at least among centrists
But yea some tend to lean right on certain issues not to say that is a bad thing cause the right wingers can be correct on some things and wrong on others eg their right about the institutions being very biased towards the left and that they are corrupt
you likely would only agree with the former but that shows you at least have some level of understanding in their ideas
and how they can have validity
the kinda libertarian idea of let the man live as he sees fit is very anti corpo and anti government in practice
something you would likely get behind at least from your own perspective
Agreed
so then which idea is like hitler este
that the conservatives buy into??
like to me it just does not follow hitler was very much anti jewish and israsel literally gets donations from us including right wing politicians
so it's not following for me
I think this comes from you being on the left and having that belief in the accuracy of your group
your not ever gonna say your group is as bad as your poltitical enemy even if you are
this is kinda the problem when this topic would be brought up with you
It's like asking tejas and nameless to give accurate non biased views of right wing positions
it's not possible as they hold cognitive bias for those topics
it's same with you just for the other side
I think the left is more biased cause they hold positions which on it's face far more deslslional
such the belief that women as a whole and random men are systemically affecting them somehow
ofc the right has deslslional beliefs too eg the great replacement theory and flat earth but these sorta things are kinda on the far right, they are not common beliefs that even a right wing pundit would argue for
not to mention, ive seen far more emotional outbursts from the twitter type leftists
which just shows they cant handle having their opinion challenged
again same goes for the right but do you really see content like this, that often?
Cant find the original video but shit like this is embarrassing and it's far more common on the left then the right
Holding up information to protect your ideology is nowhere near the same as doing it to protect an innocent person's life
What even is this argument
an man's life is more important then your ideology
not really
most western countries are pro femminist as goes most western companies so dont really see the spit on thing
Insofar as the internet yea that is common to see but that's because the mainstream media dont allow views outside of leftism so that's why the internet alot of right wing content
it really boils down to how these groups are centered
the right wing ultimately centers on being on the web
where the left ultimately centers around being on news stations,adocatcated for by target and then the government itself
the left wing is very top down where right win is more grass roots
And even then there are loads of left wing channels online, it's just not gonna be as big as conservative content logically if you want to hear the liberal/leftist take you dont need to go to vaush, you can to the mainstream media if you want the right wing view then you pretty much have to go see the content on the web cause it dont really exist anywhere else anymore
but yea the spit on thing will ultimately end up looking ether at the internet or cable tv, if it's cable tv then yea you not gonna get that perception but the internet maybe
Was more talking about facist there or whatever other buzzword
you personally throw around at people who oppose the left
When you myths
you mean the bible right??
also biases is a thing, held for both sides nearly equally
And for the story telling point?
What are you even refefering too?
and hardly call this anyone where near accurate summary of the right
if you want one, it's a poltitical party which focuses heavily on religious fundamentalism and anti government beliefs mostly held on the news station fox news and youtube channels such as steven crowder
maybe didt say perfect but think that is a accurate summary of the right
link to some neutral and scientific sources
Almost like french wikipedia didt show up on a english person's search bar
who could of guessed that
and as shown before, literally showed a screenshot of what a google search found
so this was your fault not mine cause there was no way for me to actually source what you were saying without specifically knowing it was a french idea
men paying for women and not vice versa
proves im to have a sexist bias?
literally fucking how
me stating that's how the world works dont make me sexist
how is dudes getting the short end of the stick
the fault of patriarchy, a male centered society focused on the men ruling
how does that idea in practice in modern day if men as we agree are getting very horrible lifes, poverty,homelessness,depression and so on are all issues facing men
how does that reality work if men just run the show
what are they are making a system to make themselves homeless??
how da fuck does that make sense
what if im just cite right wing women
would be fine to do??
I mean it's still women
And btw
the women are living the same shit lives as the rest of us, poverty and inflation however only difference they can get a man to pay for shit to help them where im not able too and if that was a possibility then id do as my mother did marry for money then dip never seeing anyone again
what changed from being right wing
to the far leftist you are now??
I dont have a large swaft of men or women around me outside my aunt,grandmother,grandfather and two male cousins
So it's kinda not a thing im to do cause im to have no friends or girlfriend
besides, I dont much like people anyway
not like they have done much to help me, women or men otherwise
And never said the experinces of men and women are equal
I think men have it worse due to often lacking the same social and financial support that women tend to have
so im opressed if im to jerk off to femboy hentai without anybody knowing??
how does that even make sense
never said
you couldt
just that are not many women in the field so having a equal number of males and females to look at for represenation purposes is just impossible at least if you were to look at critically
you would have to vastly ignore a great many scientists if you wanted to look at a equal 50 50
Supporting lgbt or not would not be the same as grass is green type stuff it really ultimately depends on your outlook
some people who are naturalists will think gay is bad cause it's not natural and other people will say being gay is okay cause people should have the freedom as to act how they please
Which side you as a person take up does not ultimately deny a basic fundamental fact of the world like how grass is green or sky is blue
me personally agreeing with the more libertarian argument there rather then the naturalist one has no barring on if lgbt acceptance depends on outlook or not
a fact is that gay people exist right? a belief is that they are ok and should be accepted
denying the fact makes you delusional, denying the belief simply means you have a different outlook
That's not what was meant
What was talked about was the football team type stuff where my team always quals being right or the moral good
I dont have a immutable intrinsic belief in one poltitical party's ideology as you do
Im not going to stan and protect the right if they do something im to dislike eg corruption,pedohipia or whatever as goes for the left as really have no biases for them as groups maybe you can say im more aligned with them on a issue to issue basis but that's not the same as me being on their team 100% right?
I think that's the perception as alot of the people will condemn things like the george flyod riots for the damages and kinda just violence present
and that kinda gives the view to you that they lean right but on the same issues like captiol riot such a event would also be condemed
There's other examples like how people handle bias as a argument, it's often again condemned on both sides at least among centrists
But yea some tend to lean right on certain issues not to say that is a bad thing cause the right wingers can be correct on some things and wrong on others eg their right about the institutions being very biased towards the left and that they are corrupt
you likely would only agree with the former but that shows you at least have some level of understanding in their ideas
and how they can have validity
the kinda libertarian idea of let the man live as he sees fit is very anti corpo and anti government in practice
something you would likely get behind at least from your own perspective
Agreed
so then which idea is like hitler este
that the conservatives buy into??
like to me it just does not follow hitler was very much anti jewish and israsel literally gets donations from us including right wing politicians
so it's not following for me
I think this comes from you being on the left and having that belief in the accuracy of your group
your not ever gonna say your group is as bad as your poltitical enemy even if you are
this is kinda the problem when this topic would be brought up with you
It's like asking tejas and nameless to give accurate non biased views of right wing positions
it's not possible as they hold cognitive bias for those topics
it's same with you just for the other side
I think the left is more biased cause they hold positions which on it's face far more deslslional
such the belief that women as a whole and random men are systemically affecting them somehow
ofc the right has deslslional beliefs too eg the great replacement theory and flat earth but these sorta things are kinda on the far right, they are not common beliefs that even a right wing pundit would argue for
not to mention, ive seen far more emotional outbursts from the twitter type leftists
which just shows they cant handle having their opinion challenged
again same goes for the right but do you really see content like this, that often?
Cant find the original video but shit like this is embarrassing and it's far more common on the left then the right
Holding up information to protect your ideology is nowhere near the same as doing it to protect an innocent person's life
What even is this argument
an man's life is more important then your ideology
not really
most western countries are pro femminist as goes most western companies so dont really see the spit on thing
Insofar as the internet yea that is common to see but that's because the mainstream media dont allow views outside of leftism so that's why the internet alot of right wing content
it really boils down to how these groups are centered
the right wing ultimately centers on being on the web
where the left ultimately centers around being on news stations,adocatcated for by target and then the government itself
the left wing is very top down where right win is more grass roots
And even then there are loads of left wing channels online, it's just not gonna be as big as conservative content logically if you want to hear the liberal/leftist take you dont need to go to vaush, you can to the mainstream media if you want the right wing view then you pretty much have to go see the content on the web cause it dont really exist anywhere else anymore
but yea the spit on thing will ultimately end up looking ether at the internet or cable tv, if it's cable tv then yea you not gonna get that perception but the internet maybe
Was more talking about facist there or whatever other buzzword
you personally throw around at people who oppose the left
When you myths
you mean the bible right??
also biases is a thing, held for both sides nearly equally
And for the story telling point?
What are you even refefering too?
and hardly call this anyone where near accurate summary of the right
if you want one, it's a poltitical party which focuses heavily on religious fundamentalism and anti government beliefs mostly held on the news station fox news and youtube channels such as steven crowder
maybe didt say perfect but think that is a accurate summary of the right
link to some neutral and scientific sources
Almost like french wikipedia didt show up on a english person's search bar
who could of guessed that
and as shown before, literally showed a screenshot of what a google search found
so this was your fault not mine cause there was no way for me to actually source what you were saying without specifically knowing it was a french idea
men paying for women and not vice versa
proves im to have a sexist bias?
literally fucking how
me stating that's how the world works dont make me sexist
how is dudes getting the short end of the stick
the fault of patriarchy, a male centered society focused on the men ruling
how does that idea in practice in modern day if men as we agree are getting very horrible lifes, poverty,homelessness,depression and so on are all issues facing men
how does that reality work if men just run the show
what are they are making a system to make themselves homeless??
how da fuck does that make sense
what if im just cite right wing women
would be fine to do??
I mean it's still women
And btw
the women are living the same shit lives as the rest of us, poverty and inflation however only difference they can get a man to pay for shit to help them where im not able too and if that was a possibility then id do as my mother did marry for money then dip never seeing anyone again
what changed from being right wing
to the far leftist you are now??
I dont have a large swaft of men or women around me outside my aunt,grandmother,grandfather and two male cousins
So it's kinda not a thing im to do cause im to have no friends or girlfriend
besides, I dont much like people anyway
not like they have done much to help me, women or men otherwise
And never said the experinces of men and women are equal
I think men have it worse due to often lacking the same social and financial support that women tend to have
so im opressed if im to jerk off to femboy hentai without anybody knowing??
how does that even make sense
never said
you couldt
just that are not many women in the field so having a equal number of males and females to look at for represenation purposes is just impossible at least if you were to look at critically
you would have to vastly ignore a great many scientists if you wanted to look at a equal 50 50
Europe asked South America to aid a proxy war they started with the help of the US, using Ukraine as a guinea pig against Russia.
And, after centuries of exploitation and international interference in South America affairs, they want us to help them?
LMAO.
South America demanded retribution for all the centuries of exploitation and how they built and sustain their "happy first world life" on our resources (and African countries as well).
GET. FUCKING. REKT.
Europe entered a subjugation process for the US for, at least, the entire last decade. They fucking bombed a shit ton of african and middle eastern countries, and left the europeans to pick up the refugees from these places.
We have our own interests to look after. Have fun with your little 2138972198372918739821798731th war or something, Europe-kun.
And, after centuries of exploitation and international interference in South America affairs, they want us to help them?
LMAO.
South America demanded retribution for all the centuries of exploitation and how they built and sustain their "happy first world life" on our resources (and African countries as well).
GET. FUCKING. REKT.
Europe entered a subjugation process for the US for, at least, the entire last decade. They fucking bombed a shit ton of african and middle eastern countries, and left the europeans to pick up the refugees from these places.
We have our own interests to look after. Have fun with your little 2138972198372918739821798731th war or something, Europe-kun.
edit:nevermind...its Ukraine.
Last edited:
The reason BJP bring up these issues is to justify what they are currently doing to Indian Muslims;
Not only Muslims, Hindus are doing the same to Sikh community in Punjab:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-34578463.amp
So, if you are not a Hindu, you are a separist or anti-national in India.
Not only Muslims, Hindus are doing the same to Sikh community in Punjab:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-34578463.amp
So, if you are not a Hindu, you are a separist or anti-national in India.
Those 13% of warmongers might as well just join the Ukrainian army instead of trying to rope everyone in a world war lol
https://yougov.de/topics/politics/a...agsfrage-nato-mitgliedschaft-von-schweden-und
https://www.rnd.de/politik/nato-bei...itlich-dafuer-722DA36ZCBNTTO4S3TVK4QLCNM.html
https://yougov.de/topics/politics/a...agsfrage-nato-mitgliedschaft-von-schweden-und
https://www.rnd.de/politik/nato-bei...itlich-dafuer-722DA36ZCBNTTO4S3TVK4QLCNM.html