ConquistadoR

The Rogue Prince
Inter-caste marriage isn't the problem, marrying a Dalit man is - ThePrint
I'm born-Hindu, non-religious by nature and i agree Casteism is still a prevelant problem in lot of places.

But this issue is far more than that, this dude (37) married a 19 year old woman with whom he was in a relationship for 4 years prior and he got away with it because he was a politican and a member of the State Government.

A lot of inter-caste marriage do happen esp. in Urban Areas.
It's still just a problem with Rural India mostly.
 
You are trying too hard to prove something which does not even exist.

Ngl, I have never heard the word Pasmanda before, not in relation to castes.
Pasmanda means poor, usually it is used to describe an area where employment rate is low.

Will Bill Gates marry his daughter to a homeless man (Pasmanda/Poor)?

Will Russians marry Hindustani?
Different cultures dude, even if the religion is same.

Maybe if you are born and raised in an Arab country, know arabic and their lifestyle, have oil money, then perhaps you can marry one.

The right question is, will Brahmin marry a Dalit?

Inter-caste marriage isn't the problem, marrying a Dalit man is - ThePrint


Caste woes continue even after inter-caste marriage. MADURAI: Youth remains Dalit despite mother being a Brahmin due to patriarchal society: TheHindu

Story told by a Dalit woman:

Perhaps the title 'Brahmin Dalit' is not appropriate. Because a dalit Hindu can convert to Islam, Christianity or to Buddhism, but she can never turn into a Brahmin. "Dalit" rigid label for life. It refuses to erode. It is a label that reminds us constantly of who we are. We stand at the end of centuries of injustice and oppression. And even today we are treated as second class humans. We are presumed to be unequal in possibly all aspects - less intelligent, less capable, less hygienic, less civilised and what not. The inequality meted out to us is justified on these counts. Source

Part of the reason why Hindus converted to Islam ⏫
Bro this straight up false. My colleague is a Dalit and he is Happily married to a Brahmin woman. Both their families are cordial with each other and they are Staunch Hindu .

But this doesn't make news because it debunked the Anti Hindu narrative of Leftist and Abrahamics.


Meanwhile show me a Syed marrying a Pasmanda

Caste System in Islam:

Islam recognizes different degrees of equality within itself. The Hidayab discusses this ranking, and different "orders" of inter-marriageability.

1.It declares that "a Quraish is the equal of Quraish." It means that there is no pre-eminence between Hashmees, Niflees, Teymees or Adwees. Sayyads who trace
their descent fromn Bibi Fatimah, the Prophet's daughter, are a race apart. A register is kept of all their marriage transactions and every attempt is made to keep their blood untaintedconvert through mixture with the lesser breeds of Muslims.

2. Next in ranking are the Sarib, the Arabs. "An Arab is the equal of the Arab," continues the Hidayab. A Quraish woman married to an Arab bedouin can repudiate that connection.

3.Then come non-Arab Muslims, the Mawali, or Ajami, more strictly, barbarians or Persians. "They are the equals of each other throughout, regard not being made among them to lineage, but to Islam." This means that an Ajami is not worthy of a woman of Arab descent.

4.And among themselves, a new convert is not the equal of one born of a converted father. Accordingly, he is not worthy of a woman born of a Muslim father. This seems to contradict the view of Imam Abu Yusuf who holds that an Ajami whose father was a Muslim is the equal of a woman whose father and grandfather were Muslims. The two views are based on two different principles.

One principle says that a man is twice the worth of a woman; the second principle says that a two-or-three generation convert is superior to a first-generation convert."


Trying to fool? I got receipts!



Go and read your own country's newspaper what they are saying about Muslim genocide in Kashmir.

RSS supporter is expected to think like you.
‘Larger conspiracy’ debunked again: SC upholds SIT’s clean chit to Narendra Modi in 2002 Gujarat riots, says Zakia Jafri’s plea is ‘devoid of merit’



Only genocide that happened in Kashmir was of Kashmiri Hindus by Islamists.

Present state of Kashmir



Meanwhile Balochistan
 
Last edited:
Bro this straight up false. My colleague is a Dalit and he is Happily married to a Brahmin woman. Both their families are cordial with each other and they are Staunch Hindu .

But this doesn't make news because it debunked the Anti Hindu narrative of Leftist and Abrahamics.


Meanwhile show me a Syed marrying a Pasmanda

Caste System in Islam:

Islam recognizes different degrees of equality within itself. The Hidayab discusses this ranking, and different "orders" of inter-marriageability.

1.It declares that "a Quraish is the equal of Quraish." It means that there is no pre-eminence between Hashmees, Niflees, Teymees or Adwees. Sayyads who trace
their descent fromn Bibi Fatimah, the Prophet's daughter, are a race apart. A register is kept of all their marriage transactions and every attempt is made to keep their blood untaintedconvert through mixture with the lesser breeds of Muslims.

2. Next in ranking are the Sarib, the Arabs. "An Arab is the equal of the Arab," continues the Hidayab. A Quraish woman married to an Arab bedouin can repudiate that connection.

3.Then come non-Arab Muslims, the Mawali, or Ajami, more strictly, barbarians or Persians. "They are the equals of each other throughout, regard not being made among them to lineage, but to Islam." This means that an Ajami is not worthy of a woman of Arab descent.

4.And among themselves, a new convert is not the equal of one born of a converted father. Accordingly, he is not worthy of a woman born of a Muslim father. This seems to contradict the view of Imam Abu Yusuf who holds that an Ajami whose father was a Muslim is the equal of a woman whose father and grandfather were Muslims. The two views are based on two different principles.

One principle says that a man is twice the worth of a woman; the second principle says that a two-or-three generation convert is superior to a first-generation convert."




‘Larger conspiracy’ debunked again: SC upholds SIT’s clean chit to Narendra Modi in 2002 Gujarat riots, says Zakia Jafri’s plea is ‘devoid of merit’



Only genocide that happened in Kashmir was of Kashmiri Hindus by Islamists.

Present state of Kashmir



Meanwhile Balochistan
4.And among themselves, a new convert is not the equal of one born of a converted father. Accordingly, he is not worthy of a woman born of a Muslim father. This seems to contradict the view of Imam Abu Yusuf who holds that an Ajami whose father was a Muslim is the equal of a woman whose father and grandfather were Muslims. The two views are based on two different principles.

The answer is right there in your own reply!

Any innovation is considered Bid'ah in Islam and it is a sin. Islam is openly against caste system.

إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِندَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ
Verily, the most noble of you to Allah is the most righteous of you.
Surat al-Hujurat 49:13​
Abu Nadrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ
O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no favor of an Arab over a foreigner, nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin, nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness. Have I not delivered the message?
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 22978, Grade: Sahih

Like I said, some families intentionally use it as an excuse to stop love marriages.
But, even love marriages are allowed if the person is religious.

According to Jaabir ibn Abd-Allaah (R.A.), Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) said:
“If one among you offers marriage to a woman, he can look at her and find something that will inspire him to marry her, then let him do so” [Saheeh Abi Dawood, no. 1832, 1834]

Like I said, it is considered Bid'ah (Syed not marrying others).

Stop wasting time about Modi. He is a convict and part of RSS.

Again, lets end this topic here.
It is turning into India vs Pakistan, which I dont want.
 
4.And among themselves, a new convert is not the equal of one born of a converted father. Accordingly, he is not worthy of a woman born of a Muslim father. This seems to contradict the view of Imam Abu Yusuf who holds that an Ajami whose father was a Muslim is the equal of a woman whose father and grandfather were Muslims. The two views are based on two different principles.

The answer is right there in your own reply!

Any innovation is considered Bid'ah in Islam and it is a sin. Islam is openly against caste system.

إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِندَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ​
Verily, the most noble of you to Allah is the most righteous of you.
Surat al-Hujurat 49:13​
Abu Nadrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ​
O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no favor of an Arab over a foreigner, nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin, nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness. Have I not delivered the message?
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 22978, Grade: Sahih

Like I said, some families intentionally use it as an excuse to stop love marriages.
But, even love marriages are allowed if the person is religious.

According to Jaabir ibn Abd-Allaah (R.A.), Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) said:
“If one among you offers marriage to a woman, he can look at her and find something that will inspire him to marry her, then let him do so” [Saheeh Abi Dawood, no. 1832, 1834]

Like I said, it is considered Bid'ah (Syed not marrying others).

Stop wasting time about Modi. He is a convict and part of RSS.

Again, lets end this topic here.
It is turning into India vs Pakistan, which I dont want.
Syed oppression of Pasmanda must end. Syed Pasmanda marriage must be encouraged.

Modi is acquitted and made free of charges by the same Supreme Court you respected for shielding Islamic terrorists. Cry
 
Last edited:

imma be honest, I fucking hate missionaries

The entire idea behind this behavior is this colonial mindset that my way of life is better than everyone else’s.
Yes.

Post automatically merged:

Why are you against Islam this much
It's scary at this point.
:believe:
I am not against any religion but I vehemently oppose the ideologies that make people hate their own ancestors, motherland and fellow human beings to the extent of raping and killing them just because they don't subscribe to the same belief system.

I mean one is brainwashed to destroy one's own motherland, nature, people and everything and this is being institutionalized by sermons every Friday.

You live in Old city, Hyderabad, your eyes get opened up go a lot of real scary things that you wouldn’t want on anyone.
 
Last edited:
I'm born-Hindu, non-religious by nature and i agree Casteism is still a prevelant problem in lot of places.

But this issue is far more than that, this dude (37) married a 19 year old woman with whom he was in a relationship for 4 years prior and he got away with it because he was a politican and a member of the State Government.

A lot of inter-caste marriage do happen esp. in Urban Areas.
It's still just a problem with Rural India mostly.
Indian sub-continent has a lot of issues. For example dowry.
But we need to move on and leave these traditions behind.
Yeah, educated and developed areas are more tolerant and easygoing.
Regardless, I don't really care how people live their life or what their religion is.
But Tejas was relating the caste system with Muslim ideology, while the Quran has clear verses about the said issues.
 
Indian sub-continent has a lot of issues. For example dowry.
But we need to move on and leave these traditions behind.
Yeah, educated and developed areas are more tolerant and easygoing.
Regardless, I don't really care how people live their life or what their religion is.
But Tejas was relating the caste system with Muslim ideology, while the Quran has clear verses about the said issues.
100% Agree on this.
Lots of backward practices like Nikah-halala, where helpless women are sexually exploited and Polygamy and Trile Talaq must be left behind
 
I said traditions dumbfuck, not religious matters.
And, can you please stop quoting me?
If Those are oppression systems,they must end.

And selective hypocrisy must be called out.

Especially now since majority of Indian population is aware of these

And throwing out insults helplessly only proves that you are triggered
 
Last edited:
C

Cruxroux

I am not against any religion but I vehemently oppose the ideologies that make people hate their own ancestors, motherland and fellow human beings to the extent of raping and killing them just because they don't subscribe to the same belief system.

I mean one is brainwashed to destroy one's own motherland, nature, people and everything and this is being institutionalized by sermons every Friday.

You live in Old city, Hyderabad, your eyes get opened up go a lot of real scary things that you wouldn’t want on anyone.
100% Agree on this.
Lots of backward practices like Nikah-halala, where helpless women are sexually exploited and Polygamy and Trile Talaq must be left behind
You sure 🫠🫠🫠
 
C

Cruxroux

If Those are oppression systems,they must end.

And selective hypocrisy must be called out.

Especially now since majority of Indian population is aware of these

And throwing out insults helplessly only proves that you are triggered
Yea but Muslims ain't even majority India , how come their Abuse is in major when majority is in Hindu in reality. 🤔🤔🤔
Post automatically merged:

Couldn't be surer
How about practice detachment from Hinduism and following it from a safe distance.....
Since when defending a religion is anyone's job?
You're acting like mercenaries at this point 🫠🫠
 
Yea but Muslims ain't even majority India , how come their Abuse is in major when majority is in Hindu in reality. 🤔🤔🤔
They are India 's second largest Majority
Again I am not against Muslims. I have many Muslim friends.

My fight is against Radicalized people who are brainwashed by their Madrasa cleric and start stone pelting
 
C

Cruxroux

My fight is against Radicalized people who are brainwashed by their Madrasa cleric and start stone pelting
That's a not a issue as big as you're making it out to be.


They are India 's second largest Majority
Again I am not against Muslims. I have many Muslim friends.
NGL every tweet you shared straight off says that......

Lemme just clarify ain't in any danger.
 
Top