Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
There's a far cry between "history field" and "some historians".
History as a field is imprecise anyway, and there are point of contention over less important topics than Genocide. The national and other bias of historians notwithstanding.
And yes, I do call everyone that denies genocide a genocide denier - be it the Holodomor, Holocaust, Bosnian genocide, Rwandan genocide...
As for your link, I concede, I was not aware of those documents. I was refering to the clear fake the president (?) Of Israel showed which had text in English on it as if they needed English translations for Arabic speakers.
However, why would fighters carry printed out Top Secret orders in their pockets is questionable to me and makes me doubt the veracity of the source.
[automerge]1698329909[/automerge]
History as a field is imprecise anyway, and there are point of contention over less important topics than Genocide. The national and other bias of historians notwithstanding.
And yes, I do call everyone that denies genocide a genocide denier - be it the Holodomor, Holocaust, Bosnian genocide, Rwandan genocide...
As for your link, I concede, I was not aware of those documents. I was refering to the clear fake the president (?) Of Israel showed which had text in English on it as if they needed English translations for Arabic speakers.
However, why would fighters carry printed out Top Secret orders in their pockets is questionable to me and makes me doubt the veracity of the source.
[automerge]1698329909[/automerge]
Last edited:
When even the NYT proves that the Israel "proofs" are lies:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/24/world/middleeast/gaza-hospital-israel-hamas-video.html
I guess the genocide defender is gonna say that nyt is paid by Hamas
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/24/world/middleeast/gaza-hospital-israel-hamas-video.html
I guess the genocide defender is gonna say that nyt is paid by Hamas
No, it was always pistols anyways from what I know.
The gun laws changed already, but it's nothing big (so not a lot of potential gun owners added)
What changed is that anyone with a "Combatant ID" can now apply for a gun license. (So any one who was a combat soldier in the army)
Before it was only based on location IIRC (so people who lived next to arab villages/borders)
this doesn't affect anyone now, as the whole gun bureaucracy can't deal with all the new requests for gun licenses
[automerge]1698334623[/automerge]
take your meds
The gun laws changed already, but it's nothing big (so not a lot of potential gun owners added)
What changed is that anyone with a "Combatant ID" can now apply for a gun license. (So any one who was a combat soldier in the army)
Before it was only based on location IIRC (so people who lived next to arab villages/borders)
this doesn't affect anyone now, as the whole gun bureaucracy can't deal with all the new requests for gun licenses
[automerge]1698334623[/automerge]
take your meds
[automerge]1698335149[/automerge]
yes and what does this has to do with anything here?get out of your mommas basement.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/23/israel-still-blocking-aid-civilians-gaza
What's gonna the genocide deniers say when another war crime is denounced by a third party non-affiliated with neither government?
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...eli-attacks-wipe-out-entire-families-in-gaza/
And another one!
Look at this According to Amnesty International’s findings there were no military objectives in the house or its immediate vicinity, this indicates that this may be a direct attack on civilians or on a civilian object which is prohibited and a war crime.
Why would they bomb civilians?
What's gonna the genocide deniers say when another war crime is denounced by a third party non-affiliated with neither government?
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...eli-attacks-wipe-out-entire-families-in-gaza/
And another one!
Look at this According to Amnesty International’s findings there were no military objectives in the house or its immediate vicinity, this indicates that this may be a direct attack on civilians or on a civilian object which is prohibited and a war crime.
Why would they bomb civilians?
https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/23/israel-still-blocking-aid-civilians-gaza
What's gonna the genocide deniers say when another war crime is denounced by a third party non-affiliated with neither government?
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...eli-attacks-wipe-out-entire-families-in-gaza/
And another one!
Look at this According to Amnesty International’s findings there were no military objectives in the house or its immediate vicinity, this indicates that this may be a direct attack on civilians or on a civilian object which is prohibited and a war crime.
Why would they bomb civilians?
What's gonna the genocide deniers say when another war crime is denounced by a third party non-affiliated with neither government?
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...eli-attacks-wipe-out-entire-families-in-gaza/
And another one!
Look at this According to Amnesty International’s findings there were no military objectives in the house or its immediate vicinity, this indicates that this may be a direct attack on civilians or on a civilian object which is prohibited and a war crime.
Why would they bomb civilians?
[automerge]1698335733[/automerge]
How is he insulting you? By calling you a gun nut? It's like calling me a wine nut cause I like wine.
There's a difference between a firearm owner and gun nut.
You're basing this on Orwellion level hysteria that one day the government will come and take every single freedom away with the basis guns will help defend our rights/lives in this scenario, thus fitting the epithet.
The issue is that this is a fantasy scenario. This is the last danger that should be on your mind - violent, barbaric humans that are detrimental to society are far more of a pressing issue.
Owning guns doesn't change sick or violent people. It does not protect school children from turning into a lifeless sack of meat or a parent's grief. It does not change the fact that these circumstances are not predictable and symptoms of violent, dark thoughts are overlooked.
Charles J Whitman had a brain tumor. It will never change the fact, regardless of his condition, that people's lives were lost. Some were saved. Doesn't mean it balances out the deaths that occured.
If it makes you feel less attacked, you fit the gun enthusiast descriptor.
I still disagree on this tireless take.
You're basing this on Orwellion level hysteria that one day the government will come and take every single freedom away with the basis guns will help defend our rights/lives in this scenario, thus fitting the epithet.
The issue is that this is a fantasy scenario. This is the last danger that should be on your mind - violent, barbaric humans that are detrimental to society are far more of a pressing issue.
Owning guns doesn't change sick or violent people. It does not protect school children from turning into a lifeless sack of meat or a parent's grief. It does not change the fact that these circumstances are not predictable and symptoms of violent, dark thoughts are overlooked.
Charles J Whitman had a brain tumor. It will never change the fact, regardless of his condition, that people's lives were lost. Some were saved. Doesn't mean it balances out the deaths that occured.
If it makes you feel less attacked, you fit the gun enthusiast descriptor.
I still disagree on this tireless take.