Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Then, tell me where I'm wrong instead of saying "you can't read".
If you say so. People can see and judge for themselves.
I'm the one having the most pleasure here. :cheers:
Not what I said. Again, you didn't read.
What I said is:
Not subscribing to ANY ideology means not subscribing to ANY values. And it was not specifically aimed at you mate.
What you understoodis:
You are not subscribing to a single a single ideology therefore you are not subscribing to any values.
> Not the same sentence, not the same meaning, not at all what I said.
For once. Please. Read.
"Case by case" is "sometimes" for me but ok. If you prefer.
And again, you are not saying why.
I define gender as science define it. You prefer to use dictionnaries. Not the same process.
That's literally what a reorganization of society is and could look like mate, and since the majority of societies are based on religions or faith or beliefs systems, this uncompass the entire world.
For real.. you are tiring. You know full well that you don't master the subject, but you keep going....
I WAS a follower of the new atheism movement and a FAN of Dawkins a few years back !! And in the groups I followed we were literally talking about reorganizing societies through a rationnal lens following discourse of the "thinking leaders" like Dawkins. When I say that this movement is problematic, its not just because I read about it on reddit, its because the biases that came with following this movement directly impacted my vision of society and religion and created a lot of biases and illegitimate hate.
No, but if you want.
Same phrasing problem lol...
Not really contradicting me here mate... :/
But again you will try to sort your way out of the argument with the help of dictionnaries definitions (that are not really helping you really.. ) instead of actually trying to debunk the subject of my argumentation.. being that when you hold no ideology/doctrine/beliefs (call it however you want), you hold no values and therefore being neutral is just the fact of not holding values. Which is simply impossible and just plainly unethical.
Again, you are proving nothing here, you just said "you said something wrong" (I did not) without even explaining why and how its wrong...
This is your entire argumentation : Wind.
Ok, did not say you did either.
Well, this means that you don't understand either why not taking side is always taking a side
If you say so. People can see and judge for themselves.
I'm the one having the most pleasure here. :cheers:
Not what I said. Again, you didn't read.
What I said is:
Not subscribing to ANY ideology means not subscribing to ANY values. And it was not specifically aimed at you mate.
What you understoodis:
You are not subscribing to a single a single ideology therefore you are not subscribing to any values.
> Not the same sentence, not the same meaning, not at all what I said.
For once. Please. Read.
"Case by case" is "sometimes" for me but ok. If you prefer.
And again, you are not saying why.
I define gender as science define it. You prefer to use dictionnaries. Not the same process.
That's literally what a reorganization of society is and could look like mate, and since the majority of societies are based on religions or faith or beliefs systems, this uncompass the entire world.
For real.. you are tiring. You know full well that you don't master the subject, but you keep going....
I WAS a follower of the new atheism movement and a FAN of Dawkins a few years back !! And in the groups I followed we were literally talking about reorganizing societies through a rationnal lens following discourse of the "thinking leaders" like Dawkins. When I say that this movement is problematic, its not just because I read about it on reddit, its because the biases that came with following this movement directly impacted my vision of society and religion and created a lot of biases and illegitimate hate.
No, but if you want.
Same phrasing problem lol...
Not really contradicting me here mate... :/
But again you will try to sort your way out of the argument with the help of dictionnaries definitions (that are not really helping you really.. ) instead of actually trying to debunk the subject of my argumentation.. being that when you hold no ideology/doctrine/beliefs (call it however you want), you hold no values and therefore being neutral is just the fact of not holding values. Which is simply impossible and just plainly unethical.
Again, you are proving nothing here, you just said "you said something wrong" (I did not) without even explaining why and how its wrong...
This is your entire argumentation : Wind.
Ok, did not say you did either.
Well, this means that you don't understand either why not taking side is always taking a side
I disagree, wholeheartedly here. Sure people suck, depending on person to person. But C4N scales far worse and on a bigger scale, it's incomparable.
@HopOnTheHype came closer than all the rest.
@HopOnTheHype came closer than all the rest.
That's literally what a reorganization of society is and could look like mate, and since the majority of societies are based on religions or faith or beliefs systems, this uncompass the entire world.
For real.. you are tiring. You know full well that you don't master the subject, but you keep going....
I WAS a follower of the new atheism movement and a FAN of Dawkins a few years back !! And in the groups I followed we were literally talking about reorganizing societies through a rationnal lens following discourse of the "thinking leaders" like Dawkins. When I say that this movement is problematic, its not just because I read about it on reddit, its because the biases that came with following this movement directly impacted my vision of society and religion and created a lot of biases and illegitimate hate.
For real.. you are tiring. You know full well that you don't master the subject, but you keep going....
I WAS a follower of the new atheism movement and a FAN of Dawkins a few years back !! And in the groups I followed we were literally talking about reorganizing societies through a rationnal lens following discourse of the "thinking leaders" like Dawkins. When I say that this movement is problematic, its not just because I read about it on reddit, its because the biases that came with following this movement directly impacted my vision of society and religion and created a lot of biases and illegitimate hate.
bro, that first paragraph literally doesnt say what you claim it is saying lmfao xD i dont need to master anything to expose you on this
and well, you doing this shit or you following weird groups doesnt mean dawkins or any other of the supposed "new atheists" are doing that. and the wiki article doesnt say that at all. it talks about criticising religion if religious people base society on its values lmao.
[automerge]1707173803[/automerge]
ye bob is pretty bad as well
[automerge]1707173826[/automerge]
oh yeah that dude was also a nutjob
[automerge]1707173900[/automerge]
so if i phrase it like you want it phrased its still a problem. . . . figures, because you are an inconsistent hypocritical lunatic.
[automerge]1707174002[/automerge]
this already shows how you arent actually reading what im saying.
you arent here for actual discourse buddy and it shows.
on another note: what is the action you take against the oppression? other than posting here of course
[automerge]1707174141[/automerge]
lmfao, i clearly showed you posting that being neutral (i.e. what you think is what i said about myself) equals to not caring.
and then you say you dont remember saying that i dont care.
thats a very obvious lie lmao.
Last edited:
I don't wanna see you on libs of TikTok. Please reconsider.
[automerge]1707177014[/automerge]
A lot of racist systems and laws were created by democrats.
I never looked into it myself so this is as good a hear say. I don't even know her political party. I heard the women who formed planned parenthood were extremely racist, which is why they created it to lower minority populations. Like I said don't quote me on that.
[automerge]1707177112[/automerge]
I don't like that YouTuber. I feel like he rewrites facts for his narrative. Very click baity. Though I have seen this story come up on a few channels so I plan on watching it eventually.
[automerge]1707177014[/automerge]
A lot of racist systems and laws were created by democrats.
I never looked into it myself so this is as good a hear say. I don't even know her political party. I heard the women who formed planned parenthood were extremely racist, which is why they created it to lower minority populations. Like I said don't quote me on that.
[automerge]1707177112[/automerge]
I don't like that YouTuber. I feel like he rewrites facts for his narrative. Very click baity. Though I have seen this story come up on a few channels so I plan on watching it eventually.
Bob wants women to be forced to marry without them having any sort of say in the matter. Nameless has openly stated that communists should be hunted down and executed.
C4N just has a superiority complex. He's annoying yes, but he has never called for any sort of death penalty due to political affiliation or depriving citizens of their right to choose.
C4N just has a superiority complex. He's annoying yes, but he has never called for any sort of death penalty due to political affiliation or depriving citizens of their right to choose.
Communist=Nazi. If i said the said the same about Nazis,you wouldnt be bitching. Its cool to bash nazis,because they are dead and have no power. Communist/socialist are the status quo. you can get cancelled,sued,put in jail or executed(depending where you live) over remarks like this. I'm a proud anti-communist. Deal with it,pussy. You spit on the grave of a 100 million people killed by this ideology.
Also,i don't really recall talking about execution. I do remember talking about using the Polish method(jail). Care to dig those quotes? If its guerrilla fighters,drug dealers and terrorists like the ones in Colombia (FARC), then i'm 100% pro execution.
[automerge]1707178430[/automerge]
He makes an effort to be disliked.
Also,i don't really recall talking about execution. I do remember talking about using the Polish method(jail). Care to dig those quotes? If its guerrilla fighters,drug dealers and terrorists like the ones in Colombia (FARC), then i'm 100% pro execution.
[automerge]1707178430[/automerge]
He makes an effort to be disliked.
Last edited:
See guys? He veils his unhinged takes and obvious hypocrisy when it comes to tolerance and respect behind the excuse that nazis are communists when any serious academic would laugh this guy out of the room in the face of this ridiculous 4chan level claim. It's not me who has real anger issues and throws tantrums when people call me out. All he's done is bitch and moan about Al not liking him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes
"conspiracy theory"
[automerge]1707179061[/automerge]
Cubans do that pretty often,i believe they even get automatic political asylum in America if they land on shore.
What is ridiculous is that this guy comes from a country that has suffered because of this ideology and he thinks he is doing any good by throwing stones at me when i say commie=nazi.
[automerge]1707179171[/automerge]
Version 2:
Version 3
Version 4:
Version 5:
Final Version:
Latino fight club! Toby is American.
"conspiracy theory"
[automerge]1707179061[/automerge]
Cubans do that pretty often,i believe they even get automatic political asylum in America if they land on shore.
What is ridiculous is that this guy comes from a country that has suffered because of this ideology and he thinks he is doing any good by throwing stones at me when i say commie=nazi.
[automerge]1707179171[/automerge]
Version 2:
Last edited:
That nazis are communists? THis is what Al means by you gaslighting others. I don't deny Bolsheviks committing genocide against others, it's how you equate those who believe in communism as an economic model to nazis.
I've never called Al in here nor am I buddy-buddy with him. He just doesn't like you.
I've never called Al in here nor am I buddy-buddy with him. He just doesn't like you.