@Toby D. Dog I'd like to know this too, I know he did some fuck shit in the past but I can't exactly remember it. I just know it was vile
Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
The fact that you use one example of political violence in order to disprove my point (which is solely based on empirical evidence) is more than enough reason to not really engage you wholeheartedly.
Not even my very rightwing parents who hate this government to death, feel comfortable placing blame on the current government. I stick to what I know for certain.
Not even my very rightwing parents who hate this government to death, feel comfortable placing blame on the current government. I stick to what I know for certain.
Hate to break it to you but we all die.
Animosity aside, Charlie Kirk got quite the good death actually. I'd almost say he didn't deserve to go so quickly.
So imho the possible reasons are:
A)Disgruntled Republican that points to internal divisions within Republicans / trump supporters / maga
B)former republican that became disillusioned for some reason
C) trump supporter / maga whose sole goal it is to pin it on the left to further fan the flames of public division
3 articles on different site I've just read that meantioned the shell casings explained the lyrics' background.
I sincerely doubt JDB of all people is unfamiliar with this particular song😂
Haha last person I heard use this expression was language simp yt channel
Animosity aside, Charlie Kirk got quite the good death actually. I'd almost say he didn't deserve to go so quickly.
So imho the possible reasons are:
A)Disgruntled Republican that points to internal divisions within Republicans / trump supporters / maga
B)former republican that became disillusioned for some reason
C) trump supporter / maga whose sole goal it is to pin it on the left to further fan the flames of public division
3 articles on different site I've just read that meantioned the shell casings explained the lyrics' background.
I sincerely doubt JDB of all people is unfamiliar with this particular song😂
Haha last person I heard use this expression was language simp yt channel
Sorry, I'm not an expert in gang violence. But I would say start to reduces wealth inequalities first and then you will be able to do more.
You won't be able to fight gangs as long as people will have to join them to survive.
Then I can't trust all your informations I'm sorry, but I don't know who your are putting into your "gang" categories, violent mobs ? political fighters ? Terrorist ? Narcotrafficers ? It's impossible to know through your word and the situation in south america is highly complex even more when we know that the US imperialism is trying to destroy the stability of the region.
A simple check on the Comando Vermelho made me understand there was no emancipatory behavior from them, it's a narcotraffic organization. You are spreading far right conspiracy BS that can be debunked through a simple search. And you are assimilating the violence with leftist.
Don't start to make me interested in the situation of brazil and make REAL research from REAL scholars. Because you won't have no more excuzes to spread your rethoric.
Focus on material conditions of existence. Stop the reason for people to join these violent organization in the first place and maybe you will have more place to think about other solutions later.
From what I know, bolsonaro completely negated the help to the poor and social services while making friend with paramilitaries of Rio
https://jacobin.com/2020/11/brazil-jair-bolsonaro-jogo-do-bicho-corruption-crime
Which is the reason for the assassination of multiple LEFTIST activists.
And your solution is more gun ? Don't make me laugh.. In reality you are just a scared man who was convinced by your white friend or youtube that leftism was the problem in your country when in reality it has nothing to do with this.
Capitalism is not the only system of domination, it's quite a recent one.
You said "there are no completely patriarcal societies either" which is plain wrong.
Sorry bro
We are in a full and complete patriarcal society (worldwide). It's not necessarily radical (there are nuance like you said), but it's a real and full patriarcal one and a complete system. There are no exceptions. You are confusing a global culture and a global system.
Systems of domination =/= country/culture/nation/populations
Systems means systems. The imparialism of the west is shared by MANY nations. THe domination of capitalism is shared by ALL nations.
Patriarchy > Same
While there are nuance of radicality (we are not talibans in europe for ex), the structural nature is similar.
I'm looking beyond, you are looking the wrong way. I know what I'm talking about when I talk about global systems of domination.
You won't be able to fight gangs as long as people will have to join them to survive.
Then I can't trust all your informations I'm sorry, but I don't know who your are putting into your "gang" categories, violent mobs ? political fighters ? Terrorist ? Narcotrafficers ? It's impossible to know through your word and the situation in south america is highly complex even more when we know that the US imperialism is trying to destroy the stability of the region.
A simple check on the Comando Vermelho made me understand there was no emancipatory behavior from them, it's a narcotraffic organization. You are spreading far right conspiracy BS that can be debunked through a simple search. And you are assimilating the violence with leftist.
Don't start to make me interested in the situation of brazil and make REAL research from REAL scholars. Because you won't have no more excuzes to spread your rethoric.
Focus on material conditions of existence. Stop the reason for people to join these violent organization in the first place and maybe you will have more place to think about other solutions later.
From what I know, bolsonaro completely negated the help to the poor and social services while making friend with paramilitaries of Rio
https://jacobin.com/2020/11/brazil-jair-bolsonaro-jogo-do-bicho-corruption-crime
Which is the reason for the assassination of multiple LEFTIST activists.
And your solution is more gun ? Don't make me laugh.. In reality you are just a scared man who was convinced by your white friend or youtube that leftism was the problem in your country when in reality it has nothing to do with this.
Capitalism is not the only system of domination, it's quite a recent one.
You said "there are no completely patriarcal societies either" which is plain wrong.
Sorry bro
We are in a full and complete patriarcal society (worldwide). It's not necessarily radical (there are nuance like you said), but it's a real and full patriarcal one and a complete system. There are no exceptions. You are confusing a global culture and a global system.
Systems of domination =/= country/culture/nation/populations
Systems means systems. The imparialism of the west is shared by MANY nations. THe domination of capitalism is shared by ALL nations.
Patriarchy > Same
While there are nuance of radicality (we are not talibans in europe for ex), the structural nature is similar.
I'm looking beyond, you are looking the wrong way. I know what I'm talking about when I talk about global systems of domination.
I'll repeat myself:
Learn what other cultures are.
Political caricature and fervent secularism are an integral part of French culture.
The mindset –as well as in other west European cultures – is: every religion deserves to be criticized and be made fun of, if you can't handle it you're overly sensitive and certainly not enlightened enough.
Basically what Monty Python did with Life of Brian for Christianity.
It's important to note that caricatures of religion are NOT synonymous with hate crime or disrespect against the religion in question, nor are they necessarily omotivated by blind hate and disrespect on the side of the caricaturist. The tone is NOT "haha all religions suck get fvked religious people"
It follows the doctrine that nothing ,not even religion ,is too holy to be above public scrutiny. The very fact that, after centuries of the church dictating public and spiritual life, we now have the freedom to criticize and relentlessly make fun of it is celebrated.
The Muhammad caricatures were not an attack on all Muslims and their belief, just like Life of Brian doesn't make fun of Jesus or Christianity. On the contrary, religious caricatures may have a deeper meaning and address problems beyond the surface.
Caricatures are intended to be provocative to make.people pay attention to the underlying message.
I hope my explanation did something for you, although after seeing your ignorant reactions to North American culture having the concept of reclamation of ethnic slurs completely fly over your head despite multiple users trying their best to educate you my hopes are not exactly high haha
Learn what other cultures are.
Political caricature and fervent secularism are an integral part of French culture.
The mindset –as well as in other west European cultures – is: every religion deserves to be criticized and be made fun of, if you can't handle it you're overly sensitive and certainly not enlightened enough.
Basically what Monty Python did with Life of Brian for Christianity.
It's important to note that caricatures of religion are NOT synonymous with hate crime or disrespect against the religion in question, nor are they necessarily omotivated by blind hate and disrespect on the side of the caricaturist. The tone is NOT "haha all religions suck get fvked religious people"
It follows the doctrine that nothing ,not even religion ,is too holy to be above public scrutiny. The very fact that, after centuries of the church dictating public and spiritual life, we now have the freedom to criticize and relentlessly make fun of it is celebrated.
The Muhammad caricatures were not an attack on all Muslims and their belief, just like Life of Brian doesn't make fun of Jesus or Christianity. On the contrary, religious caricatures may have a deeper meaning and address problems beyond the surface.
Caricatures are intended to be provocative to make.people pay attention to the underlying message.
I hope my explanation did something for you, although after seeing your ignorant reactions to North American culture having the concept of reclamation of ethnic slurs completely fly over your head despite multiple users trying their best to educate you my hopes are not exactly high haha
I just asked a question. Don't wear the shoe if it doesn't fit. I didn't point any fingers. I wonder who profited from a right-wing opposition leader that was set to win the elections in Colombia... I'm still trying to figure it out; this is so weird. Nicaragua and Venezuela too. I'm trying to figure out what's up with those places? They don't even have hammer/scythe/ak flags like in Africa...Actually, why are there so many African nations with hammer/scythe/ax flags in Africa?...Make it make sense....Brazil...Jair...Why would the most popular president ever try to dismantle democracy? He even tried to make elections more fair by bringing back printed votes. Was he trying to steal elections by doing that? Yeah, sure, that was DEFINITELY it. JAIR TRIED TO STEAL ELECTIONS AND OVERTHROW DEMOCRACY. ALEXANDRE DE MORAES IS RIGHT. TRUMP SHOULD MIND HIS FUCKING BUSINESS. YOU READ THAT RIGHT, FEDERAL POLICE
Because he’d get the shit kicked out of him if he admitted that in real life, Nazis are gigantic pussies when confronted 