I actually do support responsible gun ownership and believe the Second Amendment should be protected…the idea of having a firearm doesn’t fully appeal to me, but I understand why (most) people want them and they should have the right to defend themselves - again, responsibly:beckmoji:
This, for ex, is something radical that I changed while listening here.

I was against private gun ownership (and still is) BUT looking at the rise of fascism... my mind is starting to wonder.. maybe not an actual private personnal ownership, but a collectivisation... I don't know
 
Sorry for the long post in advance. This thread has been a little dry lately so I wanted to try to kickstart a healthy discussion with some civil discourse.

Even though I think stricter regulations are necessary, I actually do support responsible gun ownership and believe the Second Amendment should be protected…the idea of having a firearm doesn’t fully appeal to me, but I understand why (most) people want them and they should have the right to defend themselves - again, responsibly:beckmoji:
I'm fully strapped so I agree. Common sense gun legislation shouldn't be this hard to pass on paper but it is a slippery slope. Let's say for example if there's a person with a background of mental health issues and the law prohibits them from owning a gun. Just purely hypothetically, it's like we're telling someone that just because they have mental health struggles, they aren't entitled to the same right to protect themselves as the rest of us. Of course it would depend on the nature of their struggles and perhaps you could have some sort of a system in place where they'd have to undergo some sort of test or examination but even those measures can be arbitrary to an extent due to the nature of the disability.
This, for ex, is something radical that I changed while listening here.

I was against private gun ownership (and still is) BUT looking at the rise of fascism... my mind is starting to wonder.. maybe not an actual private personnal ownership, but a collectivisation... I don't know
I'm not sure how something like that would even work, its difficult to imagine. Ideally there would be laws in place that prohibit a governing body from mobilizing military force within its own borders against its own citizens but when your very government itself is threatened and your constitution is constantly violated, laws mean nothing to them.

I guess I'll throw out some of my controversial right wing views. Totally open to debate these and change my views since I believe approaching a debate with no intent to see the other person's viewpoint is ultimately a fruitless endeavor.

1. I don't believe children should be given the agency to transition until they are of legal age
2. Transgenderism is a mental disorder and there are only two true genders. I don't say this in a way meant to belittle transgender individuals. They're not crazy or dumb or anything along those lines and they deserve exactly the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us however, if you were born biologically as one gender but you identify as the other, I believe it fits the technical definition of a mental disorder
3. I very much believe in traditional gender roles (but obviously I don't believe everyone should be forced to conform to them)
4. As much as I am for universal health care, I think having private healthcare as an option for those who can afford it is fine
5. Fundamentally DEI initiatives can be problematic (but due to bigotry they are necessary)

---------------
While I'm at it I'll also throw out my most controversial leftist takes:
---------------

1. I don't believe in freedom of speech fundamentally; I view it as a necessary evil.
2. Wealth caps should be imposed in the U.S. on anyone with a personal net worth above $100,000,000
3. Universal basic income should be available to everyone
4. The immigration process should be simplified drastically at least concerning allied nations
5. Education should be free and never be privatized while funding should always be distributed evenly on a per capita basis

I also want to say that I am not a centrist. I identify as a leftist.
 
Last edited:
1. I don't believe children should be given the agency to transition until they are of legal age
2. Transgenderism is a mental disorder and there are only two true genders. I don't say this in a way meant to belittle transgender individuals. They're not crazy or dumb or anything along those lines and they deserve exactly the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us however, if you were born biologically as one gender but you identify as the other, I believe it fits the technical definition of a mental disorder
The me of three years ago would not have taken what you said here lightly and while I still think the same way about this rethoric, I believe it's no use in labelling you specifically in this space. Instead, I will tell you this:

If a very fragile trans person happened to read what you said, it could deal damages.

You can't say "Transgenderism is a mental disorder" and say "I don't say this in a way meant to belittle transgender" at the same time all the while denying their existence in the process. What you are factually doing (and I know exactly what I'm talking about here as an handicaped man who was called a mentally ill man as an insult hundreds of times) is dehumanizing them.

(I believe - from experience here - that your first reflex will be to tell me that you didn't dehumanize them. I'm not saying this to attack or label you but describe the words you are using from the point of view of someone who is called a "mentally ill" enough to implode. Trust me. You might not think it's a dehumanization, but it is)

This is the belief that trans people are a category of person that we must heal from themselves. A category of person that is not legitimate in their existence. I think it's useless to try to counter what you said on gender, so I suggest this:

For the moment. I would recommend not to talk about or TO trans people as long as you deny their legitimate existence (at least in front of them or social media), even without saying all of that to them, there is a risk of you hurting them or acting against them. If you are willing to change this.. I can only recommend you to find and follow cool trans people on social media. A least 10-15 there are thousands of amazing creators on youtube, twitch and other plateforms for that. This could make you understand that there is absolutely not mental disorder here.

I won't consider you an ally for this reason, leftism needs complete trans acceptance.
 
Sorry for the long post in advance. This thread has been a little dry lately so I wanted to try to kickstart a healthy discussion with some civil discourse.


I'm fully strapped so I agree. Common sense gun legislation shouldn't be this hard to pass on paper but it is a slippery slope. Let's say for example if there's a person with a background of mental health issues and the law prohibits them from owning a gun. Just purely hypothetically, it's like we're telling someone that just because they have mental health struggles, they aren't entitled to the same right to protect themselves as the rest of us. Of course it would depend on the nature of their struggles and perhaps you could have some sort of a system in place where they'd have to undergo some sort of test or examination but even those measures can be arbitrary to an extent due to the nature of the disability.

I'm not sure how something like that would even work, its difficult to imagine. Ideally there would be laws in place that prohibit a governing body from mobilizing military force within its own borders against its own citizens but when your very government itself is threatened and your constitution is constantly violated, laws mean nothing to them.

I guess I'll throw out some of my controversial right wing views. Totally open to debate these and change my views since I believe approaching a debate with no intent to see the other person's viewpoint is ultimately a fruitless endeavor.

1. I don't believe children should be given the agency to transition until they are of legal age
2. Transgenderism is a mental disorder and there are only two true genders. I don't say this in a way meant to belittle transgender individuals. They're not crazy or dumb or anything along those lines and they deserve exactly the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us however, if you were born biologically as one gender but you identify as the other, I believe it fits the technical definition of a mental disorder
3. I very much believe in traditional gender roles (but obviously I don't believe everyone should be forced to conform to them)
4. As much as I am for universal health care, I think having private healthcare as an option for those who can afford it is fine
5. Fundamentally DEI initiatives can be problematic (but due to bigotry they are necessary)

---------------
While I'm at it I'll also throw out my most controversial leftist takes:
---------------

1. I don't believe in freedom of speech fundamentally; I view it as a necessary evil.
2. Wealth caps should be imposed in the U.S. on anyone with a personal net worth above $100,000,000
3. Universal basic income should be available to everyone
4. The immigration process should be simplified drastically at least concerning allied nations
5. Education should be free and never be privatized while funding should always be distributed evenly on a per capita basis

I also want to say that I am not a centrist. I identify as a leftist.
I really wouldn't claim transgenderism is a mental disorder.
 
The me of three years ago would not have taken what you said here lightly and while I still think the same way about this rethoric, I believe it's no use in labelling you specifically in this space. Instead, I will tell you this:

If a very fragile trans person happened to read what you said, it could deal damages.

You can't say "Transgenderism is a mental disorder" and say "I don't say this in a way meant to belittle transgender" at the same time all the while denying their existence in the process. What you are factually doing (and I know exactly what I'm talking about here as an handicaped man who was called a mentally ill man as an insult hundreds of times) is dehumanizing them.

(I believe - from experience here - that your first reflex will be to tell me that you didn't dehumanize them. I'm not saying this to attack or label you but describe the words you are using from the point of view of someone who is called a "mentally ill" enough to implode. Trust me. You might not think it's a dehumanization, but it is)

This is the belief that trans people are a category of person that we must heal from themselves. A category of person that is not legitimate in their existence. I think it's useless to try to counter what you said on gender, so I suggest this:

For the moment. I would recommend not to talk about or TO trans people as long as you deny their legitimate existence (at least in front of them or social media), even without saying all of that to them, there is a risk of you hurting them or acting against them. If you are willing to change this.. I can only recommend you to find and follow cool trans people on social media. A least 10-15 there are thousands of amazing creators on youtube, twitch and other plateforms for that. This could make you understand that there is absolutely not mental disorder here.

I won't consider you an ally for this reason, leftism needs complete trans acceptance.
I understand the statement itself can come across as offensive on a surface level, even harmful to someone lacking the mental fortitude to deal with something like that being said to them but I also don’t believe in sugar coating my stance to make it sting less. I would never attempt to stereotype or dehumanize any trans person, I simply view it in a similar light in which I would view someone with chronic depression or someone who is a high functioning autistic person. That isn’t to say I think it’s something they should overcome as it isn’t something that impairs them like chronic depression would, it’s just that their minds are at odds with their body’s physicality, similar to how a high functioning autistic person’s mind differs from the norm. They mostly just think differently and that’s completely fine. I don’t believe pointing out differences is dehumanization as most humans have differences.
[automerge]1758356110[/automerge]
I really wouldn't claim transgenderism is a mental disorder.
That is completely fine, I definitely don’t think it’s something inherently harmful but more so an indicator of their minds working in a different way than a cisgender person’s would.
[automerge]1758357343[/automerge]
Also @Logiko thank you for not immediately moving to label me as a transphobe. I’m open to understanding your point of view on dehumanization. Statements of this nature can certainly be isolating and that in and of itself can lead to people not feeling accepted but I believe acceptance comes in spite of differences.
 
Last edited:
To the lefties: What's the most controversial typically right wing stance you agree with?
Reducing illegal or unchecked immigration and deporting immigrants over serious crimes
[automerge]1758358648[/automerge]
And to the righties: Why the sudden flip flop on cancel culture and censorship? (unless you disagree with it)
Not a rightie but i think its because of their precious feelings that supposedly dont matter in the face of facts
[automerge]1758359004[/automerge]
. Transgenderism is a mental disorder and there are only two true genders. I don't say this in a way meant to belittle transgender individuals. They're not crazy or dumb or anything along those lines and they deserve exactly the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us however, if you were born biologically as one gender but you identify as the other, I believe it fits the technical definition of a mental disorder
Mind the sex/gender distinction, with sex being biological and gender being socially constructed
[automerge]1758359143[/automerge]
dehumanizing them.

(I believe - from experience here - that your first reflex will be to tell me that you didn't dehumanize them. I'm not saying this to attack or label you but describe the words you are using from the point of view of someone who is called a "mentally ill" enough to implode. Trust me. You might not think it's a dehumanization, but it is)
Mentally ill human beings are still human beings, even if they identify as cats
[automerge]1758359253[/automerge]
That isn’t to say I think it’s something they should overcome
Which they generally cant anyway
 
Last edited:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...ion-on-entry-of-certain-nonimmigrant-workers/

He’s using anti-immigrant sentiment and racism to push literal fascism. And folks cheering this hate immigrants so much(Indians in this case) that they can’t even see what’s happening.

In the order, he says that the restriction will not apply if the Secretary of State deems that the immigrant, company, or industry is “in the national interest”.

What this means is that he’s furthering the leverage his administration has over private companies. If a company does something he doesn’t like, he can just take away their immigrants.

And if the Jimmy Kimmel situation is any indicator, this is exactly what will happen.
[automerge]1758382638[/automerge]
America is fr turning into a 3rd world country.

In another 30 years we will be like Russia if this keeps going
[automerge]1758382775[/automerge]
https://youtube.com/shorts/63p3FPWN2K0?si=8s4hkYJdok9Q4vZL
 
no


Also @Logiko thank you for not immediately moving to label me as a transphobe. I’m open to understanding your point of view on dehumanization. Statements of this nature can certainly be isolating and that in and of itself can lead to people not feeling accepted but I believe acceptance comes in spite of differences.
Just know that if I don't label you here, it's because I want to keep the conversation going because there is no other way to dealt with what I see on this thread and I don't think trans people will come at the moment here. In another (and potentially safe) space, what you said would create hellfire.

I understand the statement itself can come across as offensive on a surface level, even harmful to someone lacking the mental fortitude to deal with something like that being said to them but I also don’t believe in sugar coating my stance to make it sting less. I would never attempt to stereotype or dehumanize any trans person, I simply view it in a similar light in which I would view someone with chronic depression or someone who is a high functioning autistic person. That isn’t to say I think it’s something they should overcome as it isn’t something that impairs them like chronic depression would, it’s just that their minds are at odds with their body’s physicality, similar to how a high functioning autistic person’s mind differs from the norm. They mostly just think differently and that’s completely fine. I don’t believe pointing out differences is dehumanization as most humans have differences.
There is a lot of contradiction here.

First, you need to trust me, as someone who actually deal with a mental and handicaped condition, that being called out with a mental disorder for something that is not the case is, by definition, a dehumanization process. This absolutely needs to be understood. No matter if you still think that or not after the fact. The reason for that, and I already explained it previously, you are denying the legitimacy in the existence of a person.

No matter what you think about trans people, this basis needs to be understood. From their point of view (and mine) it's a dehumanization. And if you wanna be accepted as a leftist, which I believe you have the potential of. A big belief needs to go:


So, I will get a little bit technical:


1 - Transidentity:


Transidentity is not a mental disorder. Trans people function the absolute SAME way as Cis people, they are simply Trans. If you think that's wrong, verify the very basis for your belief, check and recheck where you learn that it was a mental disorder and have a critical and reasonnable look on those sources to see if they are worthy of trust or not.


2 - Gender Disphoria

You are confusing, I think, Trans identity with the real trouble that is gender disphoria. Gender disphoria is something that many trans people will struggle with. Here it what gender disphoria is:

Imagine that as a man, your entire environement identify you as a woman, they call you "she" "her", your parent gave you a girl's name, they are dressing you in dresses, educate you as a woman with all the gender roles that comes with it etc. Well, you will surely feel "disconnected" with the way people see you, right?

Gender Disphoaria is the name for this disconnection. It's called a mental disorder, but it's actually not one, it's a REACTION to the environement that does not aknoledge the legitimacy of your true self.

This creates depression, and a lot of times suicidal ideations if something is not done soon.

3 - How society influence gender disphoria

Dealing with gender disphoria doesn't mean treating the trouble, it requieres for the environement to change. This means allowing not only the person to identify as who they really are, but accepting them, accepting even the fact that they will seek to change their body to feel better with this disconnection etc.

As you can see, if a person is Trans, it's because of their environement.

If society was safe for Trans people, Trans people would arrive in the world without even feeling different, they would not be assignated a sex at birth and they would not even call themselve a trans person to begin with.

This is a VERY important thing you will need to understand about leftism and structural systems of domination:


>> Homosexuality, non valid people, black, brown, asian, trans identity, non binarity etc. those are labels that are VERY RECENT. These are categories that have been recuperated by those people in order to fight back the assignation itself.

These categories actually do NOT exist as real separated entities from the human existence spectrum. These are categories that systems of domination (capitalism, systemic racism, ableism, patriarchy) have created or promoted as a tool to dominate those people.

They are now a necessity for US to fight back, but in a safe world, they will disappear. There is no reason to call a black man black if you don't have to make the difference for ex.

4 - Gender

First, you need to learn about the impact of gender role and patriarchy on intersex people. This should scratch a few fallacious beliefs about gender roles

For now, I will not say anything more about gender, I think I gave you too much informations already to diggest. But know that, if you keep a traditionnal vision of gender role, you will also alienate leftist from yourself as you will be defending patriarchy against leftist who are fighting it.

And leftism, by default, is also the understanding that patriarchy must fall.

-------

Now. Maybe you don't believe what I told you here. If that's the case, I suggest you to take the time to look at human sciences and learn a bit about domination systems, especially patriarchy, capitalism and ableism.



Not a rightie but i think its because of their precious feelings that supposedly dont matter in the face of facts
While I will be nice to Z Zaber because I believe he has good intention. I'll not be with you.

You are not factual, you don't know anything about the science behind trans identity or even listen to them as actual people. Do not talk about fact when you are denying their existence. Go follow a few trans people.

Shut up, listen and learn.


For now, you are an absolute danger to those people and absolutely NOT an ally to leftism.


Mentally ill human beings are still human beings, even if they identify as cats
You don't understand dehumanization.

Dehumanization is the process of denying the LEGITIMACY of an existence. If I have ADHD but you call be a skyzophreniac, you are dehumanizing me. Not because being skyzophreniac is worse, but because you are denying the legitimacy and very existence of the material condition of my existence.

As such, if you believe and SAY that (for ex) trans women are men, you are dehumanizing them and participating in their oppression.

Agree or not, it does not matter, it's about fact. Factually, you are a problem at the moment.
 
Yo Logiko @Logiko if I start working on some memes that debunk antisemitic arguments, would you like to work on it together?

Maybe some other people would be interested too, I would like to ask about it on r/tankiejerk too
 
Yo Logiko @Logiko if I start working on some memes that debunk antisemitic arguments, would you like to work on it together?

Maybe some other people would be interested too, I would like to ask about it on r/tankiejerk too
Nah, I'll pass. But good luck with that!
Like I told you a few month back, I don't wanna do anything here more than I'm already doing. Unless I have a spark of stupidity that makes me do dumb shit like the video I did. But that's only exceptionnal and personnal.

I don't want to involve myself out of what I'm capable of. And I'm not capable of much at the moment.

:kata:
 
While I will be nice to Z Zaber because I believe he has good intention. I'll not be with you.

You are not factual, you don't know anything about the science behind trans identity or even listen to them as actual people. Do not talk about fact when you are denying their existence. Go follow a few trans people.

Shut up, listen and learn.


For now, you are an absolute danger to those people and absolutely NOT an ally to leftism.
i dont care my guy.

and your accusations here are wrong anyway.
[automerge]1758388143[/automerge]
You don't understand dehumanization.

Dehumanization is the process of denying the LEGITIMACY of an existence. If I have ADHD but you call be a skyzophreniac, you are dehumanizing me. Not because being skyzophreniac is worse, but because you are denying the legitimacy and very existence of the material condition of my existence.

As such, if you believe and SAY that (for ex) trans women are men, you are dehumanizing them and participating in their oppression.

Agree or not, it does not matter, it's about fact. Factually, you are a problem at the moment.
regardless of your performative bullshit, im not denying anyones humanity, existence, identity, or whatever. So i dont need to agree or disagree, you are just wrong.

And i dont care over you making terms lose their meaning either.
 
Last edited:
i dont care my guy.

and your accusations here are wrong anyway.
regardless of your performative bullshit, im not denying anyones humanity, existence, identity, or whatever. So i dont need to agree or disagree, you are just wrong.
And i dont care over you making terms lose their meaning either.
Yes you are.

You don't know shit about transidentity. Learn about it or shut the F up about the subject if you are not willing to listen. At the moment, you are a danger for trans people.

I'm done playing nice with people who use rationnality as a tool of oppression
 
2 - Gender Disphoria

You are confusing, I think, Trans identity with the real trouble that is gender disphoria. Gender disphoria is something that many trans people will struggle with. Here it what gender disphoria is:

Imagine that as a man, your entire environement identify you as a woman, they call you "she" "her", your parent gave you a girl's name, they are dressing you in dresses, educate you as a woman with all the gender roles that comes with it etc. Well, you will surely feel "disconnected" with the way people see you, right?

Gender Disphoaria is the name for this disconnection. It's called a mental disorder, but it's actually not one, it's a REACTION to the environement that does not aknoledge the legitimacy of your true self.

This creates depression, and a lot of times suicidal ideations if something is not done soon.
you completely forgot to mention that gender dysphoria can also be about a disconnection and dissatisfaction with their physical appearance, especially primary and secondary sex characteristics. . . .
[automerge]1758388539[/automerge]
Yes you are.

You don't know shit about transidentity. Learn about it or shut the F up about the subject if you are not willing to listen. At the moment, you are a danger for trans people.

I'm done playing nice with people who use rationnality as a tool of oppression
:okay:
 
you completely forgot to mention that gender dysphoria can also be about a disconnection and dissatisfaction with their physical appearance, especially primary and secondary sex characteristics. . . .
It's implied. But the point is elsewhere:

The lack of acceptation of their body comes from the look the environement reflect to them on their body > Which they see has a disconnection. As such, it's not an inate, but a responsive problem. In a safe society, trans people would not feel the need to change their body ... as there would not be trans people to begin with.

Again. Learn about transidentity and stop talking about it until you do.
 
Baldy dysmorphia is a serious subject but no one ever mentions it. Let’s agree to fund research with public money and give a ticket to Turkey to every baldies in the meantime :getnappaed:



Bald-phobia ENDS NOW !
Tbh, the only reason why it isn't funded by governments is because the Rich have expensive realistic wigs

South Park somehow hit the spot when it said "Rich people get Ozempic, poor people get body positivity" and it applies to practically every issue where poor people are told to "embrace" it while Rich people can just buy solutions to it
 
Top