Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
He even has white friends though!
[automerge]1761136399[/automerge]
2d women with big tits.
Can I have your vote?
[automerge]1761136539[/automerge]
Those people really don't understand what racism means.
If you are white and think you are superior to any other color. You are racist.
If you are white and think you are inferior to any other color. You are racist.
No matter what color your are if you think you are superior/inferior to any other. Guess what? You are racist!
[automerge]1761136636[/automerge]
There is human race and white ethinicity.
[automerge]1761136399[/automerge]
2d women with big tits.
Can I have your vote?
[automerge]1761136539[/automerge]
yep, because only white people colonized and only white people can view themselves as superior to other 'races'.
If you are white and think you are superior to any other color. You are racist.
If you are white and think you are inferior to any other color. You are racist.
No matter what color your are if you think you are superior/inferior to any other. Guess what? You are racist!
[automerge]1761136636[/automerge]
There is human race and white ethinicity.
Last edited:
I think the term "Own the Libs" is very interesting, from the people who miss the days when African children were traded in public as sex slaves.
And then the people who want to "Own the Libs" both support:
1. The government kidnapping poor children (the demographic most likely to be sexually trafficked)
2. A man who used teenagers to run a sex-spa in Florida, and has been associated with a global crime syndicate involving multiple heads of state, which has been proven real by Prince Andrew, a great friend of Jeffrey Epstein.
Wow, it's almost like some of these domestic terrorists want to "Own the Libs"
Because they miss the days when their ancestors owned child sex slaves.
Like Thomas Jefferson, who raped and forcefully impregnated a 14-year-old African Girl, Sally Hemmings.
And these freaks can tell me they never supported what they are.
If that's the case, why did the US government and education system teach me to worship a known slave-trafficking child rapist like Thomas Jefferson, who impregnated 14-year-old Sally Hemmings?
They aren't lying
They want to "Own the Libs" and "Make American Great Again"?
Yeah, because they love slavery, and want to make it legal to use black kids as their sex slaves again
Which tracks, because all three of the Abrahamic Religions have historically loved slavery, and justified it within their scriptures.
We can still see slavery legal in places like Dubai. I guess that's why I always hated Jehovah: all the scripture with him just feels like a master talking down to their slaves, when Christ acted the complete opposite. Well, congrats, MAGA, you've convinced me that your God is real, and your God is freaking Satan in disguise, because that's the only thing that explains why ya'll have any power: its puppets sucking up to a fatter evil. Ya'll are the Satan.
Only reason the North Atlantic Slave Trade stopped in the first place was economic boycotts by the British Commonwealth being disgusted by the nobility's treatment of enslaved Africans.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z3rj7ty/revision/7
Own the Libs?
Nah.
Imprison the Fascists who use religion and politics to make children their slaves.
And then the people who want to "Own the Libs" both support:
1. The government kidnapping poor children (the demographic most likely to be sexually trafficked)
2. A man who used teenagers to run a sex-spa in Florida, and has been associated with a global crime syndicate involving multiple heads of state, which has been proven real by Prince Andrew, a great friend of Jeffrey Epstein.
Wow, it's almost like some of these domestic terrorists want to "Own the Libs"
Because they miss the days when their ancestors owned child sex slaves.
Like Thomas Jefferson, who raped and forcefully impregnated a 14-year-old African Girl, Sally Hemmings.
And these freaks can tell me they never supported what they are.
If that's the case, why did the US government and education system teach me to worship a known slave-trafficking child rapist like Thomas Jefferson, who impregnated 14-year-old Sally Hemmings?
They aren't lying
They want to "Own the Libs" and "Make American Great Again"?
Yeah, because they love slavery, and want to make it legal to use black kids as their sex slaves again
Which tracks, because all three of the Abrahamic Religions have historically loved slavery, and justified it within their scriptures.
We can still see slavery legal in places like Dubai. I guess that's why I always hated Jehovah: all the scripture with him just feels like a master talking down to their slaves, when Christ acted the complete opposite. Well, congrats, MAGA, you've convinced me that your God is real, and your God is freaking Satan in disguise, because that's the only thing that explains why ya'll have any power: its puppets sucking up to a fatter evil. Ya'll are the Satan.
Only reason the North Atlantic Slave Trade stopped in the first place was economic boycotts by the British Commonwealth being disgusted by the nobility's treatment of enslaved Africans.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z3rj7ty/revision/7
Own the Libs?
Nah.
Imprison the Fascists who use religion and politics to make children their slaves.
Last edited:
Big yikes…even if he’s getting out in front of it, that’s clearly Nazi iconography, not really any mistaking it for something more benign. I’m sure the righties will look the other way like they usually do when it comes to overt bigotry in politics instead of some performative pearl-clutching about respectability or whatever they say to justify why something is only morally wrong when liberals do it 
Its plausible, if you dont know about it its just another skull, but yeah its pretty much the exact nazi symbol
[automerge]1761146938[/automerge]
Its not exactly unusual for people to go to a tattoo studio and spontaneously pick something.
[automerge]1761147232[/automerge]
Nah sociology isnt the problem here.
This notion that there is no racism against white people because of a domination hierarchy is a fringe position held by crazy ideologues. Just like how "biological sex isnt real" is a fringe position
Last edited:
Im not flirting with reactionaries though. My disagreements with them are not as mild as my disagreements with you.
I live in germany, not sure why the rise of the far right should radicalize me though. Doesnt work like that
[automerge]1761147685[/automerge]
There is the human species and various ethnicities that are considered white
I live in germany, not sure why the rise of the far right should radicalize me though. Doesnt work like that
[automerge]1761147685[/automerge]
There is the human species and various ethnicities that are considered white
No, it's not lmao. Racism is a systemic issue. It's a domination system created specifically to hierarchize and as a tool of subjugation of colonized people. Therefore, there is no such thing as “reverse racism”. It's your definition of racism that is basic. It's primary school level. It's like explaining mathematics with sticks. You need to humble down. You are nowhere near an understanding of the subject.
Oh.. haha, an sanist joke!
Funny (no)
And yet, here you are, repeting their rethoric lmao
Yeah, I figured. You will see.. When your material conditions will be attacked by reactionarism and when you will notice the complete inaction of your current ideological allies, you will start to stop this "I'm rationnal therefore I know" bullshit, and you will start to actually learn about the world. Either that, or you will side with them. Just wait. Shouldn't be long... Radicality is coming.
Oh.. haha, an sanist joke!
Funny (no)
And yet, here you are, repeting their rethoric lmao
Yeah, I figured. You will see.. When your material conditions will be attacked by reactionarism and when you will notice the complete inaction of your current ideological allies, you will start to stop this "I'm rationnal therefore I know" bullshit, and you will start to actually learn about the world. Either that, or you will side with them. Just wait. Shouldn't be long... Radicality is coming.
https://www.newsweek.com/social-security-update-medicare-medicaid-warning-donald-trump-10915076
The saddest part is how many old (white) people who blindly voted for this orange cunt are getting exactly what they wanted…they hate socialism without even realizing how much they benefit from it
[automerge]1761151341[/automerge]
I mean, if I were getting something permanently seared into my skin, I would probably do 30 seconds of research on Google and double check to make sure it’s not a symbol of white supremacy…but if someone’s already a bigot of that caliber, I can see how they wouldn’t care until they get caught
The saddest part is how many old (white) people who blindly voted for this orange cunt are getting exactly what they wanted…they hate socialism without even realizing how much they benefit from it
[automerge]1761151341[/automerge]
I mean, if I were getting something permanently seared into my skin, I would probably do 30 seconds of research on Google and double check to make sure it’s not a symbol of white supremacy…but if someone’s already a bigot of that caliber, I can see how they wouldn’t care until they get caught
no, its just the general definition of racism, as opposed to systemic racism.
but i do wonder, how would you define "racist" then?
[automerge]1761156317[/automerge]
well thanks but i can have my own views independent of other people or categories of people.
[automerge]1761156457[/automerge]
so far right parties taking over = i have to inherently change my views, values, opinions and acceptance of science?
interesting. . . .
[automerge]1761156525[/automerge]
yeah getting random tats isnt my thing either.
but i do wonder, how would you define "racist" then?
[automerge]1761156317[/automerge]
well thanks but i can have my own views independent of other people or categories of people.
[automerge]1761156457[/automerge]
Yeah, I figured. You will see.. When your material conditions will be attacked by reactionarism and when you will notice the complete inaction of your current ideological allies, you will start to stop this "I'm rationnal therefore I know" bullshit, and you will start to actually learn about the world. Either that, or you will side with them. Just wait. Shouldn't be long... Radicality is coming.
interesting. . . .
[automerge]1761156525[/automerge]
I mean, if I were getting something permanently seared into my skin, I would probably do 30 seconds of research on Google and double check to make sure it’s not a symbol of white supremacy…but if someone’s already a bigot of that caliber, I can see how they wouldn’t care until they get caught
A racist is simply someone who uses dehumanization and their dominant position in whiteness to exploit and dominate or attack a racialized and most often subjugated person or group.
No. It's the basic definition, the "vulgarized" definition. As such, understanding systemic racism is level 2 and understanding whiteness is level 3. This is why most centrist won't understand systemic racism and the inexistence of reverse racism while entry leftists will and why entry leftist won't understand the concept of whiteness while sociologists and anticolonial leftists will. It's a complex concept.
Yup.. That's why I'm taking my time trying to explain something with you and I do it less with someone like Hererra or Ryo. I know that you have more political potential to understand what I'm saying that them, simply because you have less biases against sociology and leftism.
Not necessarily. It could go the other way. The world is radicalizing, the age of neoliberalism is almost over. As such, your material conditions of existence are about to change either in a good way or in a bad way (unless you are a ciswhite man in the middle-class, in which case you will feel it much later than everyone), these shift will make you radicalize. It's up to you to decide which side.
No. It's the basic definition, the "vulgarized" definition. As such, understanding systemic racism is level 2 and understanding whiteness is level 3. This is why most centrist won't understand systemic racism and the inexistence of reverse racism while entry leftists will and why entry leftist won't understand the concept of whiteness while sociologists and anticolonial leftists will. It's a complex concept.
Yup.. That's why I'm taking my time trying to explain something with you and I do it less with someone like Hererra or Ryo. I know that you have more political potential to understand what I'm saying that them, simply because you have less biases against sociology and leftism.
Not necessarily. It could go the other way. The world is radicalizing, the age of neoliberalism is almost over. As such, your material conditions of existence are about to change either in a good way or in a bad way (unless you are a ciswhite man in the middle-class, in which case you will feel it much later than everyone), these shift will make you radicalize. It's up to you to decide which side.
This bullshit has to die a brutal, agonizing death 
[automerge]1761163500[/automerge]
Well, I will hang myself from the tallest tree in the forest once Alise in Wonderland is elected chancellor. Will be the last elections anyway.
/s
Yea kinda no.
Many AfD voters are impoverished East Germans who lost their ability to make informed political choices a long time ago and are now thoroughly brainwashed to vote against their interests and whine about foreigners whenever a scapegoat is needed.
[automerge]1761163500[/automerge]
Well, I will hang myself from the tallest tree in the forest once Alise in Wonderland is elected chancellor. Will be the last elections anyway.
/s
Yea kinda no.
Many AfD voters are impoverished East Germans who lost their ability to make informed political choices a long time ago and are now thoroughly brainwashed to vote against their interests and whine about foreigners whenever a scapegoat is needed.
Last edited:
This bullshit has to die a brutal, agonizing death
Indeed. Capitalism is just a system of domination at the intersection with racism. It helps it, it's nourished by it, but it's a different system.
Meritocracy is a belief system at the intersection of capitalism, ableism & racism. As such, racialized people will invoke meritocratic principles to justify their position. Whiteness is a "social salary" that white people benefit from, but the problem is that racialized people seek this salary/position too without being able to access it (cf frantz fanon). It's a "racial contract" with white supremacy.
Meritocracy is a belief system at the intersection of capitalism, ableism & racism. As such, racialized people will invoke meritocratic principles to justify their position. Whiteness is a "social salary" that white people benefit from, but the problem is that racialized people seek this salary/position too without being able to access it (cf frantz fanon). It's a "racial contract" with white supremacy.
Indeed. Capitalism is just a system of domination at the intersection with racism. It helps it, it's nourished by it, but it's a different system.
Meritocracy is a belief system at the intersection of capitalism, ableism & racism. As such, racialized people will invoke meritocratic principles to justify their position. Whiteness is a "social salary" that white people benefit from, but the problem is that racialized people seek this salary/position too without being able to access it (cf frantz fanon). It's a "racial contract" with white supremacy.
Meritocracy is a belief system at the intersection of capitalism, ableism & racism. As such, racialized people will invoke meritocratic principles to justify their position. Whiteness is a "social salary" that white people benefit from, but the problem is that racialized people seek this salary/position too without being able to access it (cf frantz fanon). It's a "racial contract" with white supremacy.
You know what allows humans to leave behind meritocracy completely? A return to aristocratic society where the next ruler is determined through descent alone. It allows an underestimated heir with hidden talents that would have never gotten far in any sort of competition to bloom. On the other hand, it might also leave the people with an incapable, pretentious, lazy idiot not fit for leadership.
The shift away from (purely) hereditary to merit based systems is in many societies seen as a step forward to a more egalitarian society.
The real issue lies NOT within meritocracy but rather the abilities that are seen as valuable.
A society that ascribes the highest value to whatever makes you the most money is not truly meritocratic in the actual sense.
Actual meritocracies do nonetheless exist.
That's only if you think the only two option are a meritocratic society and the society of kings and lords. In reality, none of those are necessary.
No bear. They do not. No matter how hard you try, meritocracy is but a belief system, it can't exist unless you account for millions of paramaters of inequalities. If you can do that, then, maybe you will have a seemingly meritocratic society, but it won't hold long. Meritocracy is but an illusion, it can't really exist. And at the moment, meritocracy is entering in conflict with the idea of change.
No bear. They do not. No matter how hard you try, meritocracy is but a belief system, it can't exist unless you account for millions of paramaters of inequalities. If you can do that, then, maybe you will have a seemingly meritocratic society, but it won't hold long. Meritocracy is but an illusion, it can't really exist. And at the moment, meritocracy is entering in conflict with the idea of change.
This sounds like those guys who really like wealth redistribution, equality and the likes but will vehemently die on the hill that communism is unnatural and can impossibly work because "humans are not built for this", "it's unrealistic", "Marx himself was sponsored by the other guy and never had to work himself" and then they usually quote Animal Farm.
All while completely ignoring, or -even worse- being unknowledgeable about the fact there are many examples of non European societies that had rather egalitarian societies with flat hierarchies and democratic structures.
They would like their societies to change for the better but argue only based on the experiences gained from looking at their own country, culture or even their personal experiences, carefully maintaining the mental prison their ancestral elites have built over the last few centuries.
All while completely ignoring, or -even worse- being unknowledgeable about the fact there are many examples of non European societies that had rather egalitarian societies with flat hierarchies and democratic structures.
They would like their societies to change for the better but argue only based on the experiences gained from looking at their own country, culture or even their personal experiences, carefully maintaining the mental prison their ancestral elites have built over the last few centuries.