Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
While it could be the case in the past, I do not consider myself an activist now. I'm more alike of a vulgarizer or a messenger. I sadly can't really do activism in my condition. But if you are criticizing me based on my positions, knows that just like Roo, you have a lot to learn about leftism, you should listen more than criticize at the moment. Especially when you regurgitate centrists/rightist apolitical theories.
I's crazy that I've not even been that radical lmao. You are really clueless about activism. You have a lot to learn about politics and liberals.
I's crazy that I've not even been that radical lmao. You are really clueless about activism. You have a lot to learn about politics and liberals.
I have no clue what Roo's ideologies are (though he's likely right wing judging off what he's said on this forum) but I just don't care what you or him are aligned with lol
I especially don't care about you claiming I know nothing about leftism considering a fair amount of the content I see online is leftist vs rightist stuff which has been the case for months now
I especially don't care about you claiming I know nothing about leftism considering a fair amount of the content I see online is leftist vs rightist stuff which has been the case for months now
Lmao you wish. But even in the improbable case that you did, "the political me" of 2 years ago and "the political me" of today are two completely different person. Like I said, you have no idea what you are talking about at the moment. Trust me, do not even try. You wouldn't get it anyway.
And yet, you make claims that are not even acceptable for newly arrived leftists to have. Like I said, you only know the surface, not the substance. As such, you are confusing the violence of leftists with rightists violences, completely ignoring that behind said violence, there are ethics which are not present in rightism. Meaning that you are delivering a moral opinion, blind of contextual & material realities
And yet, you make claims that are not even acceptable for newly arrived leftists to have. Like I said, you only know the surface, not the substance. As such, you are confusing the violence of leftists with rightists violences, completely ignoring that behind said violence, there are ethics which are not present in rightism. Meaning that you are delivering a moral opinion, blind of contextual & material realities
“Improbable” blud all you have to do is look it up in this thread lol
You claiming to be a different person 2 or 3 years ago is not the flex you think it is. Either you were talking about politics despite being clueless or your political views are so flexible the change on a whim. Either way it just proves we shouldn’t take you seriously
You claiming to be a different person 2 or 3 years ago is not the flex you think it is. Either you were talking about politics despite being clueless or your political views are so flexible the change on a whim. Either way it just proves we shouldn’t take you seriously
Thankfully, Republicans are known for their honesty, I'm sure they'll GTFO real quick.
Same way they said they'd release the Epstein List... before they said it was a Democrat hoax... and the list was full of Democrats like Bill Clinton... despite not existing... hmmmmmmm... The non-existent Client List the Democrats made up to incriminate themselves proves the Republicans would NEVER LIE. It's just three lies humping each other at the same time. Ohhhh, sorry, that's the Abrahamic Religions collabing to bomb starving kids.
The difference between the German Nationalists and American Nationalists?
The Germans weren't live streaming their genocides, and most of the public didn't know about the Holocaust until post-World-War-2.
Somehow I think live streaming genocide is worse, but, hey, not surprised the people that can't understand that more people live in cities than the countryside, and therefore are too mentally-conservative to understand elections maps, can't count, and admit we've murdered way more than 6 millions Muslims by now. Get ready for a lot of Patri-Rots and White Supremacist Terrorists to tell you why they want to murder the VERY DANGEROUS Muslim man who wants to feed poor people and not kill them, then tell you the "Left" is violent, when they're the ones live streaming genocide.
Glad to see Muslims in America acting like Jesus, when "Christians" are sucking up to the cult made by the Romans 300 years after they tortured Jesus to death, as controlled opposition. Good for the people who voted for Christ's values over Christianity's tyranny. I hope all of the scripture the Vatican censored comes out with all of their sex crimes and other crimes against humanity.
My favorite thing about Mamdani is his smile. Very real, loving smile. I wish him the best, since a lot of racists, who would be in jail if they weren't rich and white, are going to whine about how annoying it is this Muslim guy is so much hotter, cooler, and likeable than they are.
Dude is too high energy for the party that can't handle the emotions of adult women, and prefers silent child brides instead
Such as these:
>>
+ this last one about the horseshoe theory. These are not leftists claims, they are rightist ones and I would go even farther if you haven't made more progressive claim at the same time. Which means that basically, your position is a big confusion between leftist and rightists values. You need to clear the field to move on politically and become a leftist. I'm willing to help, but you need to listen to people like me.
Whether it's true or not does not matter as explained, when I started this thread, I was stayin away from marxism, it's not the case anymore.
Oh really? Do you like not evolving? Not learning stuff?
The flexibility of my political view is not a secret. I always explained how my mind can absorb new political idea while keeping its coherency. I project - if you look back - my current political position and I project that in the near future, I will learn more and will be even more radical and revolutionary. Simply because this is a path that I'm accepting to take because I know it's the right path.
On the contrary, you should observe closely. If I can teach you anything, it's to be always ready to be wrong & accept new ways of thinking. To the question: "What ways?" The answer is for you to find. I recommend a scientific, materialist & ethical approach. Start simple, don't go radical, learn basic ideas, politicize slowly, take your time to learn. You will see, the world gonna open before your eyes.
>>
+ this last one about the horseshoe theory. These are not leftists claims, they are rightist ones and I would go even farther if you haven't made more progressive claim at the same time. Which means that basically, your position is a big confusion between leftist and rightists values. You need to clear the field to move on politically and become a leftist. I'm willing to help, but you need to listen to people like me.
Whether it's true or not does not matter as explained, when I started this thread, I was stayin away from marxism, it's not the case anymore.
Oh really? Do you like not evolving? Not learning stuff?
The flexibility of my political view is not a secret. I always explained how my mind can absorb new political idea while keeping its coherency. I project - if you look back - my current political position and I project that in the near future, I will learn more and will be even more radical and revolutionary. Simply because this is a path that I'm accepting to take because I know it's the right path.
On the contrary, you should observe closely. If I can teach you anything, it's to be always ready to be wrong & accept new ways of thinking. To the question: "What ways?" The answer is for you to find. I recommend a scientific, materialist & ethical approach. Start simple, don't go radical, learn basic ideas, politicize slowly, take your time to learn. You will see, the world gonna open before your eyes.
Who made you think that your evolution needed to stop at 40? Dude, if I can keep that mindset, keep evolving & learning stuff until I'm dead, my life will be a success. Our systems made you believe that accepting change was a weakness, when it's one of the biggest strength you can have. Do not even think for 1 second that you are being wise just by sticking to constructed opinions from 10 years ago.
Of course. That's why I'm talking about political opinions here, i'm not talking about personnality.
That is true, that's why there is a difference between leftist and their actions. A leftist can depict reactionary behaviors. But when said behavior start to change the way they thinks or when their material condition do, then the person stops being a leftist and start becoming what rightists are. Reactionaries.
I did not ask these questions about your values randomly. But because the answer to these are fundamental to understand the state of the entire belief system of a person in the current paradigm. Which means that the answer to these question was fundamental to understand if you aligned with leftists interests or not. And in your case, it's a big blob of confusion.
Well.. I'm glad you are talking about it. Because it question the notion of "being a fan". Because being a One Piece fan while trashing half of the story for no reason (because let's be honest, there are no good reasons here) it's not really being a One Piece fan, it's being a "fan of the first and earliest version of One Piece" One Piece is a full story. If you only like a portion of a cake, you don't like the cake.
Yeah. It's actually pretty basic stuff. But your reject of both of these is showing that you do not understand - even after me explaining these concepts to you - what both of these means. OR that you do understand but you do not agree, which is even worse and would be a testimony of your rightist alignment.
Nah, it's the opposite.
Of course. That's why I'm talking about political opinions here, i'm not talking about personnality.
That is true, that's why there is a difference between leftist and their actions. A leftist can depict reactionary behaviors. But when said behavior start to change the way they thinks or when their material condition do, then the person stops being a leftist and start becoming what rightists are. Reactionaries.
I did not ask these questions about your values randomly. But because the answer to these are fundamental to understand the state of the entire belief system of a person in the current paradigm. Which means that the answer to these question was fundamental to understand if you aligned with leftists interests or not. And in your case, it's a big blob of confusion.
Well.. I'm glad you are talking about it. Because it question the notion of "being a fan". Because being a One Piece fan while trashing half of the story for no reason (because let's be honest, there are no good reasons here) it's not really being a One Piece fan, it's being a "fan of the first and earliest version of One Piece" One Piece is a full story. If you only like a portion of a cake, you don't like the cake.
Yeah. It's actually pretty basic stuff. But your reject of both of these is showing that you do not understand - even after me explaining these concepts to you - what both of these means. OR that you do understand but you do not agree, which is even worse and would be a testimony of your rightist alignment.
Nah, it's the opposite.
Last edited:
It's important to understand the world in term of material and class interests. Being a leftist is not only having leftist opinions, it's also and more than anything having opinions that are in alignment with the interest of the oppressed class, or dominated groups of people. Being a rightist is the opposite. Being a rightist means having opinion & thus material interest that align AGAINST these groups of people.
As I thought, for this one, you do not understand the concept or the materialist reasoning behind the concept. I'm willing to explain, but you need to pay attention. Because it's important.
As I thought, for this one, you do not understand the concept or the materialist reasoning behind the concept. I'm willing to explain, but you need to pay attention. Because it's important.
He pushed Kamala agenda pre elections
The German ones lost because their country was defeated in a war.* No one can give Murica a military defeat.
*and not even this ended their existence. Nazis were put in high positions right after the war ended and never left, the allies allowed this. Which shows us that the allies never had an actual issue with Nazism. What pissed them off was being attacked and potentially conquered by Germany. How could the allies possibly be appalled by Nazism? They themselves had and still have colonies and profited off of slavery. They could do whatever they wanted in Africa, north America, the Pacific, India, Siberia but as soon as one of their fellow European nations decided to attack other European nations it suddenly became a problem and their leader History'sMostEvilMan™.
Mamdani is the whitest guy in the picture
The German ones lost because their country was defeated in a war.* No one can give Murica a military defeat.
*and not even this ended their existence. Nazis were put in high positions right after the war ended and never left, the allies allowed this. Which shows us that the allies never had an actual issue with Nazism. What pissed them off was being attacked and potentially conquered by Germany. How could the allies possibly be appalled by Nazism? They themselves had and still have colonies and profited off of slavery. They could do whatever they wanted in Africa, north America, the Pacific, India, Siberia but as soon as one of their fellow European nations decided to attack other European nations it suddenly became a problem and their leader History'sMostEvilMan™.
Mamdani is the whitest guy in the picture