Controversial General Political Discussion

NAMELESS

NAMELESS

‎
#77,061
#77,061
Logiko said:
Private property (not the one you think, but the one communist is fighting) is in itself ethically fundamentally against human rights bro. Please, refrain from talking about human right when you defend things that goes against human rights.

If I had one advice to you. Is to bring to yourself a drop of humility. Never have I seen you actually listen to the arguments of leftist, you are simply replying through your own lens at everypoint, without adressing points most of the time.

I debunked your thinking process so many times through every types of means (scientific papers, sociological text, logical reasonning, materialist thinking, personnal experience...). You only seem to care about what YOU think and analyze reality through YOUR lens and no others. You think you are the only one to suffer, but reality is so much bigger than your world mate.

People ask me to reflect, but damnnnnn they should look themselves into the mirror. They have no lesson to give.

Can't you see your confirmation biases??




Sorry about that. You will find someone exceptional I'm sure
Click to expand...
Your marxist opinion is irrelevant:

Article 17 - Right to property
1. Everyone has the right to own, use, dispose of and bequeath his or her lawfully acquired possessions. No one may be deprived of his or her possessions, except in the public interest and in the cases and under the conditions provided for by law, subject to fair compensation being paid in good time for their loss. The use of property may be regulated by law in so far as is necessary for the general interest.
2. Intellectual property shall be protected.
https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/17-right-property
 
Okamakama

Okamakama

‎
#77,062
#77,062
Blax Blah said:
Also quite a crazy time with it, sort of witnessed to others through it

I got bullied for a year by one girl for rejecting her in the past

But at the end of highschool she said she wished there were more guys like me
Click to expand...
From experience, women do not handle the initial rejection too well, but they tend to respect men of character. Happened with me too - except the bullying, because I just separated from communicating with her after that. After we met again down the line, I found out she appreciated it in the long-run (though I suspect she was a little sore about it still....)
 
Last edited:
NAMELESS

NAMELESS

‎
#77,063
#77,063
Okamakama said:
From experience, women do not handle the initial rejection too well, but they tend to respect men of character. Happened with me too - except the bullying, because I just separated from her after that. After we met again down the line, I found out she appreciated it in the long-run (though I suspect she was a little sore about it still....)
Click to expand...
Women don't take rejection well at all. Got called a faggot once for rejecting a girl. Another one spread gossip about me lol
 
Okamakama

Okamakama

‎
#77,064
#77,064
NAMELESS said:
Your marxist opinion is irrelevant:

Article 17 - Right to property
1. Everyone has the right to own, use, dispose of and bequeath his or her lawfully acquired possessions. No one may be deprived of his or her possessions, except in the public interest and in the cases and under the conditions provided for by law, subject to fair compensation being paid in good time for their loss. The use of property may be regulated by law in so far as is necessary for the general interest.
2. Intellectual property shall be protected.
https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/17-right-property
Click to expand...
Okay, monkey, chill. Put down the guns. We can talk about this... :noo:

NAMELESS said:
Women don't take rejection well at all. Got called a faggot once for rejecting a girl. Another one spread gossip about me lol
Click to expand...
Ever considered she was maybe right? :BigW:
 
Logiko

Logiko

‎
#77,068
#77,068
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2077816368540631240



https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2073868523751760197

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2062526733484466445

History will forever remember
NAMELESS said:
Your marxist opinion is irrelevant:
Click to expand...
You just proved my point:

No reflexion, no expansion of the understanding, no challenging your own ethics, just this:

Logiko said:
You only seem to care about what YOU think and analyze reality through YOUR lens and no others. You think you are the only one to suffer, but reality is so much bigger than your world mate.
Click to expand...

NAMELESS said:
2. Intellectual property shall be protected.
https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/17-right-property
Click to expand...
No it should not. For ethical reasons. Neither should be private propriety.

Again. Ethics > Laws.


NAMELESS said:
Women don't take rejection well at all. Got called a faggot once for rejecting a girl. Another one spread gossip about me lol
Click to expand...
I think women are diverse. It wouldn't be wise to essentialize 50% of the population based on your bad experience. This is what I mean by confirmation biases.
 
NAMELESS

NAMELESS

‎
#77,070
#77,070
Uncle Van said:
Master conspirator right here lol. This is like the 7th time you went on a rant because you assumed I was talking about you. Rent free.
Click to expand...
You made a random comment about communism once you saw logiko and I talking about it. You get pretty defensive about it for a self proclaimed non commie.

You didn't address my thoughts on my previous unfair ban either.
 
Uncle Van

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
‎
#77,072
#77,072
NAMELESS said:
You made a random comment about communism once you saw logiko and I talking about it. You get pretty defensive about it for a self proclaimed non commie.
Click to expand...
:okay:

You didn't address my thoughts on my previous unfair ban either.
Click to expand...
And that ban is? Or is this more conspiracy talk that you're randomly for the like 10th time, blaming me for? You'd think after being proven wrong like 10 times before you'd learn by now. As I said, rent free lol
 
NAMELESS

NAMELESS

‎
#77,073
#77,073
Uncle Van said:
:okay:



And that ban is? Or is this more conspiracy talk that you're randomly for the like 10th time, blaming me for? You'd think after being proven wrong like 10 times before you'd learn by now. As I said, rent free lol
Click to expand...
Didn't say or imply it was you who banned me. It happened months ago. The mod that did it knows what I'm talking about. Guy likes to ban me over bullshit reasons, like that other time I was banned for "insulting Muslims" because I used a pretty common Arabic name to mess with a German guy about the immigration crisis. Yeah, fuck this moderation. The one ban that I recognize as warranted was the SeaKaren incident. You remember that one.
 
Uncle Van

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
‎
#77,074
#77,074
NAMELESS said:
Didn't say or imply it was you who banned me.
Click to expand...
Actually you did. Don't copy the expert when you don't even know how it works lol.

It happened months ago. The mod that did it knows what I'm talking about. Guy likes to ban me over bullshit reasons, like that other time I was banned for "insulting Muslims" because I used a pretty common Arabic name to mess with a German guy about the immigration crisis. Yeah, fuck this moderation.
Click to expand...
Then go complain to him then. I ain't your therapist lol

The one ban that I recognize as warranted was the SeaKaren incident. You remember that one.
Click to expand...
I have no recollection of that actually.

You seem....to have high expectations of me having you in my thoughts....this ain't the first, second, or even 3rd time time you've done this. Atleast pay me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top