A moderator,
@Garp the Fist, already confirmed that your theory didn't mention Nika at first but just a generic "god" fruit, which is what I answered to. I first answered you march 19 at 1:56 AM and posted again march 20 at 4:28 PM; spoilers on Luffy's fruit were released on march 22 at 12:38 PM, way after I posted. Meanwhile, your earliest edit I could check through Google cache dated from tuesday 22 at 1:01 PM (half an hour after spoilers were released), and we can all see that you also edited that same day at 2:01 PM. At least I knew for a fact that you edited your title because by sunday, two days after you opened your thread, no mention of Nika was to be seen on it: your original title was "(...) there should be a god god devil fruit", not "(...) there should be a god god (nika) devil fruit".
I don't have anything against you, seriously. What I was criticizing is valid anyways because your reasoning was absurd and you indeed would have been right by pure chance ("If there is a Human human devil fruit, then there should be a god god devil fruit", no, it shouldn't, because not every mythical human is a god and Sengoku's power isn't literally a god but its material representation).
But! You quoted me and others on tuesday from 1:57 PM to 7:46 PM (so after spoilers were released) commenting stuff that strongly felt like you had read the spoilers and were addressing them outside their thread, which is against the rules. I mean...
...God in One Piece isn't Nika, there are a lot of mentioned deities and you seemingly changed your theory from a generic god fruit to a Nika model only after spoilers were released; notice that literally nobody addressed Nika in any response until you did it yourself after spoilers were out. I mean, your own answer before spoilers didn't mention Nika either and was consistent to your original theory about just a generic god power from maybe "in another religion":
Another good one. To this post:
You later answered this:
..."Almost got it"? What could he have "almost" gotten if no definitive information was known by then if not from the spoiler thread...?
And my favorite:
Why did you feel the urge to claim for my presence if you didn't know for a fact that Luffy was confirmed to have a god zoan model (even though you couldn't share spoilers out of its thread by that date)? Did you want me to keep our conversation so badly exactly the day spoilers were released or you knew something that people outside the spoiler thread shouldn't know...?
I don't care about what you'd appreciate nor will I "stop the hate" because right now I find it obvious that you were spoiling people out of the spoiler thread. If you feel better, we can ask any other staff member (I will summon them for you:
@Natalija @AL sama @Bogard @Dragomir @Garp the Fist @Gol D. Roger @Jiihad @Kiwipom @Pantheos @RayanOO @TheAncientCenturion @Van @Worst ) to check your edit record and establish when you started to explicitly address a Nika model of the Hito Hito in your theory (before or after spoilers came out...? As Garp already confirmed, it initially didn't mention him but a generic god), and also to evaluate whether your quotes last tuesday ("Almost got it", WHERE ARE YOU????", etc.) were spoiling us all or not.
Nothing personal, really. I will be happy if you actually hit the nail with your theory, but I deeply hate to be spoiled and I right now I strongly believe you're playing fool with all of us and started to edit your theory in order to make it look like you were right about Nika as soon as you read the spoilers mentioning it; and even if that wasn't the case, it's hard to look at your tuesday quotes and not feel like you were freely spoiling people here.
