General & Others Is all black lightning ACoC? How is ACoC shown?
- Thread starter DonWick
- Start date
Fair, but the point Is that explicit stament > visual effect. Kaido stated that.
And logically speaking, It would make any sense for Luffy to stop using It.
Not to mention, in those scenes Kaido too didn't have any trails.
Shanks' Kamusari too doesn't have them, Roger's Kamusari neither.
That's why there Is the problem.
And logically speaking, It would make any sense for Luffy to stop using It.
Not to mention, in those scenes Kaido too didn't have any trails.
Shanks' Kamusari too doesn't have them, Roger's Kamusari neither.
That's why there Is the problem.
Who cares about black squiggles?. Did said character do something impressive?, if yes, then just powerscale that. If a character destroys an island with his pinky, I don't really care about some aesthetic lightning effect, that doesn't change what they actually did. A character can have an oceans worth of black lightning coming out while accomplishing a feat that isn't nearly as impressive.
After Onigashima all very big and thick lightnings are CoC.
Then not a single G5 attack Is AdvCoC, which Is factually not true as per Kaido's words.
This all Is CoC explicitly, even before than logically.
But I could have posted the paradise Totsuka or even Shanks' Kamusari:
Here we have fainting, but no trails whatsoever.
Then not a single G5 attack Is AdvCoC, which Is factually not true as per Kaido's words.
This all Is CoC explicitly, even before than logically.
But I could have posted the paradise Totsuka or even Shanks' Kamusari:
Here we have fainting, but no trails whatsoever.
Lightning on swords but no lightning like shanks
The only suretell signs of ACoC are
1. curved haki trail
2. ACoA emission + haki lightning
3. fodder fainting in the surroundings
4. somebody outright says it
Anything else is speculation until it gets retconned or told to us later on. Oda evidently making this shit ambiguous to keep a horribly vague power concept afloat
1. curved haki trail
2. ACoA emission + haki lightning
3. fodder fainting in the surroundings
4. somebody outright says it
Anything else is speculation until it gets retconned or told to us later on. Oda evidently making this shit ambiguous to keep a horribly vague power concept afloat
If there's a trail, it's King's Haki based attacks.
If a clash is needed for Lightening sparks, it's not King's Haki based. Luffy and Katakuri, there's no lightening sparks until the clash. Some characters can only generate Lightening only from clashing with another Armament user like was seen between Luffy and Joker... but you'd notice there's no lightening trail in their attacks, there's only lightening after the clash.
With Roger, Whitebeard and every other King Haki based attacks, before the clash, the lightening trail is there to begin with iirc. King's Haki generates Lightening streaks/trails before even clashing with anything.
If a clash is needed for Lightening sparks, it's not King's Haki based. Luffy and Katakuri, there's no lightening sparks until the clash. Some characters can only generate Lightening only from clashing with another Armament user like was seen between Luffy and Joker... but you'd notice there's no lightening trail in their attacks, there's only lightening after the clash.
With Roger, Whitebeard and every other King Haki based attacks, before the clash, the lightening trail is there to begin with iirc. King's Haki generates Lightening streaks/trails before even clashing with anything.
