It is PIS reason. Tell me a good reason why Law did not cut off drunken Dragon-Kaidos head while Luffy was pummeling him in G3? Does Kaido have magical protection against Law's hax? He does not.
It is not PIS reason, you're desperately claiming Law could've cut off drunken Kaido, what's your proof? It just suggests Law has a limit, is that simple. If Law had cut a Top Tier before and couldn't cut Kaido in all of a sudden then i'd agree it's PIS. Law couldnt even cut Doffy in their clash and now you're claiming Law could've cut off Kaido? There's something wrong with you indeed. Everything is still consistent until now, so there's no PIS, you're just too desperate
Because he fights at his best with a sword. 99% of the OP world would fight better with a weapon. And again it doesn't change the fact that amputate is a DF ability. It's not even a slash but separation of matter at a given trajectory. You are not hurt and can reassemble.
"Because he fights at his best with a sword"
So now you agree that sword is important for Law lol?
"99% of the OP world would fight better with a weapon"
Garp, Luffy, and many others gonna disagree with you
"You are not hurt and can reassemble"
But still if you can swap someone's body and throw it into the sea it's an easy win for you, there's certainly a limit in Law's ability
and didnt you say Law can still fight without a sword? and shield protects you better than a sword, by your logic Law fits more with a shield than a sword
lastly, Oda is not that stupi to think "alright, i'll just made Law's ability without a limit and nerf it for PIS reason", it's simply that it has certain limit
Again, you're too desperate
geez, Law/Sanji wanker has never failed to amaze me with their denial and headcanon
