Character Discussion Kid did nothing wrong

Pantheos

Heavy Metal
#1
Hey guys!

For some reason, there goes the cope about Kid would have attacked the elbaf civilians or something, at least Brogy and Dorry try to justify their actions like that.

But Kid haven’t done anything like that and even in the future sight he didn’t anything in that direction.

Kid only and singlely attacked the Red Hair pirates fleet, which declared war on him, if he doesn’t drop his dream immediately (by giving the RPs to Shanks and crawl).

After this declaration of war, it is absolute reasonable to give the first shot at these pirates. He didn’t attacked civilians or planed to do so.

So, how do come Brogy and Dorry to this strange claim?
 
#2
Hey guys!

For some reason, there goes the cope about Kid would have attacked the elbaf civilians or something, at least Brogy and Dorry try to justify their actions like that.

But Kid haven’t done anything like that and even in the future sight he didn’t anything in that direction.

Kid only and singlely attacked the Red Hair pirates fleet, which declared war on him, if he doesn’t drop his dream immediately (by giving the RPs to Shanks and crawl).

After this declaration of war, it is absolute reasonable to give the first shot at these pirates. He didn’t attacked civilians or planed to do so.

So, how do come Brogy and Dorry to this strange claim?
they probably read the news paper and saw that he attacks civillians
 
#5
Hey guys!

For some reason, there goes the cope about Kid would have attacked the elbaf civilians or something, at least Brogy and Dorry try to justify their actions like that.

But Kid haven’t done anything like that and even in the future sight he didn’t anything in that direction.

Kid only and singlely attacked the Red Hair pirates fleet, which declared war on him, if he doesn’t drop his dream immediately (by giving the RPs to Shanks and crawl).

After this declaration of war, it is absolute reasonable to give the first shot at these pirates. He didn’t attacked civilians or planed to do so.

So, how do come Brogy and Dorry to this strange claim?
Agreed
Its stupid plot from Oda
One piece is the worst manga
 

Pantheos

Heavy Metal
#8
Yes he did nothing wrong. The giants did nothing wrong either though.
They attacked an already defeated and surrendered enemy.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/es/customary-ihl/v2/rule47

The rules of war clearly set the boundaries of combat. A soldier who has surrendered or who is wounded is outside them. Attacking a combatant who has surrendered is murder and the same also applies to attacking a combatant who has been wounded and has ceased to pose a threat to our forces.“
 
#10
They attacked an already defeated and surrendered enemy.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/es/customary-ihl/v2/rule47

The rules of war clearly set the boundaries of combat. A soldier who has surrendered or who is wounded is outside them. Attacking a combatant who has surrendered is murder and the same also applies to attacking a combatant who has been wounded and has ceased to pose a threat to our forces.“
This wasn't a war between soldiers, it was a pirate fight, they don't play by the rules.
They actually did.
What exactly did they do that was wrong?
 

Pantheos

Heavy Metal
#11
The Kidd Pirates went out of their way to look for a fight. They got one they couldn't handle. This is entirely on Kidd and co.
They went for the man with burned marks.
Shanks send him immediately the message to drop his dream („worse than death“ according to oda) or go into war with him.
 
#13
Shanks already did to them what Giants were talking about.
Its the giants who went a mile ahead
Kidd would have shown no mercy as we've seen in the future Shanks saw where some people died. Shanks defeated them and spared them because he's a good guy, and the giants showed no mercy just like Kidd would have done with the fleet. I see no issue here. Besides they are pirates, they should be prepared for that. Basically all real pirates would have done the same.
Just because Shanks showed mercy doesn't mean the giants should as well. There is no guarantee that once Shanks leaves, Kidd wouldn't take revenge on Elbaf citizens after their recovery.
 
#15
They attacked an already defeated and surrendered enemy.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/es/customary-ihl/v2/rule47

The rules of war clearly set the boundaries of combat. A soldier who has surrendered or who is wounded is outside them. Attacking a combatant who has surrendered is murder and the same also applies to attacking a combatant who has been wounded and has ceased to pose a threat to our forces.“
Kidd got a taste of his own medicine :kayneshrug:
 
#16
Kidd would have shown no mercy as we've seen in the future Shanks saw where some people died. Shanks defeated them and spared them because he's a good guy, and the giants showed no mercy just like Kidd would have done with the fleet. I see no issue here. Besides they are pirates, they should be prepared for that. Basically all real pirates would have done the same.
Just because Shanks showed mercy doesn't mean the giants should as well. There is no guarantee that once Shanks leaves, Kidd wouldn't take revenge on Elbaf citizens after their recovery.
You know if anyone would have survived If shanks didn't interfered. Kid and killer wasn't gonna Go personally and kill them. Kidd he needs them to be aside cuz They need to reach Shanks quick.
The giants actually went extra Mile. shanks divine departure was equivalent or more than What Kidd was about to do.
 
#17
You know if anyone would have survived If shanks didn't interfered. Kid and killer wasn't gonna Go personally and kill them. Kidd he needs them to be aside cuz They need to reach Shanks quick.
The giants actually went extra Mile. shanks divine departure was equivalent or more than What Kidd was about to do.
We see them being desintegrated. They were fodders dude, Kidd's strongest attack would have killed most of them and destroyed their ships.
 

Mr. Tuna Sandwich

SII - Sakazuki Incinerate Imu
#19
He lost.
Death > Defeat.
Post automatically merged:

They attacked an already defeated and surrendered enemy.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/es/customary-ihl/v2/rule47

The rules of war clearly set the boundaries of combat. A soldier who has surrendered or who is wounded is outside them. Attacking a combatant who has surrendered is murder and the same also applies to attacking a combatant who has been wounded and has ceased to pose a threat to our forces.“
Dude, this only apply for belligerent countries not pirates. :kayneshrug:
 
Top