Which one of us said Kou En had anything to do with Man’U to this extent?
“Hey, Kou En Sama, another one of those Generals from a state we just absorbed is marauding across Chu.”
“Okay, send his own people to fight him like we did for all the others. That should break him in.”
^Thats could be the extent of Kou En’s involvement if he was involved with ManU and co lol. Shunshinkun is more of a political mind than he is a tactical warrior mind.
But Kou En to me seems like one of those Generals with an eye for small details like Ouki talked about. The one and only quote we know from Kou En, was when Ren Pa stated that “Chu has yet to take advantage of all the resources at its disposal”, and then immediately attributed that idea to Kou En lol. Which makes Kou En sound like the exact type of General who would concern himself with “small” details like ManU and co.
This idea that Great Generals only focus on larger battlefield details is weird to me. In fact, the best Generals seem to be the ones who do have eyes for small details on the battlefield. Riboku is the greatest General of this era because he devotes himself to understanding the minor details on the battlefield. Generals like Fuuki who focus on nothing but the greater battlefield tend to get bodied by ones who focus on minute details like Ouki.
So Kou En, as Chu’s strongest General, should be someone who pays extremely close attention to the small details of Chu and the affairs of its military.
Yea but if it's something that minor, I highly doubt somebody as capable as Shunshinkun, who is the equivalent if not the superior of even Shouheikun couldn't come up with and would need to go seek out the Tiger of Chu. Especially since this is a politics 101 type of an ordeal, using the people to internally fight each other and what not, then getting them to be your pawns.
Cause Shunshinkun was smart enough to then utilize the broken generals strategically into having them defend a key city for Chu. Would be more inline if it was all part of Shunshinkun's grand plan regarding them.
"Shunshinkun is more of a political mind than he is a tactical warrior mind".. We talking about the ex-Chief of Military for Chu? He ranked higher than Koen in the military for a reason. S ranked just like the Qin 6 and of course on par with the top Great Generals in strategies (if going by stats).
Even amongst military officers, he was regarded as one of the men who stood at the absolute peak. The man personally built the Chu into a superpower of a state within 20 years.
There's a reason why this mf was made the commander-in-chief of the alliance, and why they said there's nobody more befitting to be the Coalition's leader, even more so than the man who took out Ouki and formed the coalition. He's pretty similar to Riboku actually.
Though military stuff aside the scenario you're saying feels more like a Ryofui-esque move. How he was politically smart enough to create up all those rebellion with Seikyou and the Queen, all of which required great strategizing.
Not saying your idea isn't possible, just something I'd disagree with.
[automerge]1605480081[/automerge]
I am not sure what you and I are in disagreement about because I never said that it was Kou En. In fact, I made my entire post based around the fact that Kou En was probably somewhere else.
I was confused about that as well when I read your original post with the scenarios, but since
@Blackbeard and
@Perun quoted you while talking about Tiger of Chu, thought I might've missed it or something. But since you didn't mention him, just ignore that.
I simply referred to whoever came up with the strategies as “Chu/the Chu”. I do not know for certain who in Chu came up with the plan.
..... I was not talking about the citizens of Beki at all though. Lol.
I was talking about what forces Man U fought before the citizens of Beki betrayed him.
The state of Beki and it’s people surrendered. The citizens betrayed Man U seemingly on their own free will. I am not disputing that at all.
The state of Kei was said to have fallen to Chu. Half of their populace was then enslaved.
Since Beki surrendered, Chu could very well have shown them more mercy than they did to Kei.
I simply found it odd that Man U would lose only 1000 soldiers to a standard Chu Army. Losing only 1000 trained soldiers to a force of low morale enslaved conscripts from other city states (not Beki) that have never fought before would make a lot of sense.
It was a hypothetical scenario that came from a train of thought regarding what Chu would do to 1/2 of an enslaved population (likely the half that consists of all males of fighting age if said hypothetical scenario is correct) and on how Man U’s casualties would seemingly be so low.
Of course, my hypothetical scenario could be entirely wrong but hey, it sure is fun to speculate. Lol.
Ah ok then I misunderstood that. I agree with this then, sounds like a political move that Shunshinkun would come up with where you just use the people of the conquered states to fight other states you're going to conquer (and of course more efficient for the Chu, considering the # of states they had to deal with).
But would it be more beneficial for them to use the enslaved populous for that rather than the free populous? Because if you already have them enslaved, you just put them into labor like for your citizens, like how Shin & Hyou were slaves doing labor. Where as you need something for that free populous, you throw them into an army, making room for your actual citizens.