Left Wing vs Right Wing
- Thread starter TheAncientCenturion
- Start date
what on do you even mean.. he's the same dood who invented modern basics of algebra and you think thats nothing to brag about?
upon research i'd concede a fundamental mistake here.. algorithm the term i just derived from Khawrizmi's name not the concept itself.. so modren inspiration for algorithm actually goes back antiquities
well i can just switch it to Algebra and still maintain the same premise.. and Algebra is a fundamental invention.... the whole point is he's still not as quoted by concurrent masses as it should be..
I do not disagree but that doesn't take the achievement away from him... it doesn't matter is some unknown bloke figured it out and lost his papers .. we trace the origin back to Khawrizmi not mr, anonymous.. since his works have been adapted they lay the foundation ... there is no need to argue around that and ask for technicalities of ever so unlikely possibilities of blokes coming uo with the same thing
I'm not here to start a pointless philosophical debate about technicalities.. the point is.. there is an invention and someone made it public.. the credit is due to him
as simple as that mate
i agree with the first half which is WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SAY you keep deflecting any invention is necessary but fundamentals are still fundamentals in this case be Khawarizmi's Algebra or Ibn Haithams "Scientific method" and optics but i don't deny that too majority of Maths is basically refinement and development over initial works but concepts derived that govern most of modren systems and machines should be recognized.. is Galileo is known for first telescope.. what about the first person who develop the first camera?
history is remembered through the present that complements it.. but only if its publicized transparently
upon research i'd concede a fundamental mistake here.. algorithm the term i just derived from Khawrizmi's name not the concept itself.. so modren inspiration for algorithm actually goes back antiquities
well i can just switch it to Algebra and still maintain the same premise.. and Algebra is a fundamental invention.... the whole point is he's still not as quoted by concurrent masses as it should be..
I do not disagree but that doesn't take the achievement away from him... it doesn't matter is some unknown bloke figured it out and lost his papers .. we trace the origin back to Khawrizmi not mr, anonymous.. since his works have been adapted they lay the foundation ... there is no need to argue around that and ask for technicalities of ever so unlikely possibilities of blokes coming uo with the same thing
I'm not here to start a pointless philosophical debate about technicalities.. the point is.. there is an invention and someone made it public.. the credit is due to him
as simple as that mate
i agree with the first half which is WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SAY you keep deflecting any invention is necessary but fundamentals are still fundamentals in this case be Khawarizmi's Algebra or Ibn Haithams "Scientific method" and optics but i don't deny that too majority of Maths is basically refinement and development over initial works but concepts derived that govern most of modren systems and machines should be recognized.. is Galileo is known for first telescope.. what about the first person who develop the first camera?
history is remembered through the present that complements it.. but only if its publicized transparently
In my country, I would be centrist or leaning left. In USA, I am right wing. The left wing in the is all about virtue signaling. They are fucking annoying. On the other hand, the right wingers in US are hypocrites and in some cases, outright malicious. But the voices of both group is only getting traction because of Twitter and other social media.
Fortunately, the social hierarchy is not stable rather it is a swinging pendulum. Whenever left wing go too far, right wing will win and vice versa. Shoving someone's own principles down everyone's throat never works, and it will never work. Humans by nature will always form fractions on any topic (no matter how moral/immoral it may be).
Fortunately, the social hierarchy is not stable rather it is a swinging pendulum. Whenever left wing go too far, right wing will win and vice versa. Shoving someone's own principles down everyone's throat never works, and it will never work. Humans by nature will always form fractions on any topic (no matter how moral/immoral it may be).
I've seen it used well and wasted by opportunistic low lives. Gotta make welfare an incentive/reward based.
It should increase if you're doing good things.
- Your kids aren't dropping out of school
- holding a job for a long time
- going to college(bad idea)/boot camp(Smart idea)
- obtain a certification
- fostering relative children
Welfare still needs to be given. if you don't, it always get worse 10 years later. Stupid people with no hope dictate the future.
It should increase if you're doing good things.
- Your kids aren't dropping out of school
- holding a job for a long time
- going to college(bad idea)/boot camp(Smart idea)
- obtain a certification
- fostering relative children
Welfare still needs to be given. if you don't, it always get worse 10 years later. Stupid people with no hope dictate the future.
Welfare is something that is needed in third world countries. Rich countries don't need this stuff.You will only live on the streets if you are mentally ill and that is a completely different problem.
Global warming has more to do with the Sun's cycle.Some scientists say we might get into a mini ice age in a couple of years.I feel like the climate is getting colder down here in south america.
Post automatically merged:
Global warming has more to do with the Sun's cycle.Some scientists say we might get into a mini ice age in a couple of years.I feel like the climate is getting colder down here in south america.
Last edited:
It is known that solar activity correlates with earth temperature. And as empirical climate observations over more than 300 years have shown, climate change is normal, while a constant climate is a rarity. From a meteorological point of view, the fact that the term "climate change" has a negative connotation today contradicts the natural course of the climate. We should rather adapt to climate change than try to change it. Because there is no scientific agreement on how great the influence of humans on the climate is. Unfortunately, there is no real public debate about it, and that is unscientific. The Global Climate Intelligence Group has released a statement entitled “There is no climate emergency”. This declaration was signed by more than 1,100 scientists and experts from around the world, led by Norwegian-American Nobel laureate and physicist Professor Ivar Giaever.
https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/
https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/
