Controversial Marineford Marco vs Rooftop Zoro, who performed better?

#21
Marco attacked 3 admirals and did 0 damage
Marco defended Whitebeard against 1 top tier attack
Marco defended Luffy from 1 top tier attack

Zoro saved Luffy from Big Mom’s Prometheus attack
Zoro saved Luffy from Kaido
Zoro hurt Kaido several times
Zoro gave Kaido a scar
Zoro saved the entire operation by holding off hakai

Zoro makes Marco look like a chump lol
Bro entirely fucking Hakaied this thread with that one. But this time Woro is not there to help
 
#25
you and @JoNdule should make a club of most delusional people on this forum :gokulaugh::gokulaugh:
Despite ZKK not happening, and all the proof that Shanks>Mihawk, and ZKKtards are still wanking Zolo and Mihawk, and also still saying shits like Luffy = Zolo, is the proof that ZKKtards are the no.1 undisputed most delusional fans of all times, no one even compete with them.

Bro entirely fucking Hakaied this thread with that one. But this time Woro is not there to help
Debunked all that shit easily.

Luffy and Law saved Zolo's ass several times and Zolo was out and in cross form he needed to be carried by Lanji.

But no one saved Marco and Marco wasn't out, still fighting.

If Marco was doing no damage, then why Kizaru, Aokiji and Akainu didn't counter attack Marco immediately?

WB tried to stab Aokiji, it didn't work, Aokiji counter attacked him, almost was going to stab him if not for Jozu.
Marco kicked Aokiji, break his ice sword, send him flying, Aokiji didn't counter attack Marco immediately.

Kizaru continued to attack after Marco stopped Kizaru's attack for WB (something Mihawk didn't do vs. Jozu) Marco attacked Kizaru and send him flying, Kizaru stopped attacking Marco after that. If Marco's attack was no factor or 0 damage, why Kizaru didn't stay there and kept attacking WB pirates from the sky?
Why Kizaru had to warn Giants about Marco's attack power?

After nerfed Marco attack Akainu, Akainu showed the sign of pain by making a noise, and retreated from attacking Luffy and Ace, if Marco's attack was 0 damage, why Akainu made a noise and why Akainu retreated? When Jinbe attacked Akainu, Akainu didn't make a noise and continued to attack Luffy, and damaged Luffy and Jinbe when Jinbe shielded himself for Luffy.

Marco showed an attack power that threatens the Admirals, if he didn't show that, Admirals would simply keep attacking and ragdolling Marco, Marco would be no factor by only healing himself.


Marco saved Luffy from both Akainu and Aokiji, not just 1 attack.

Marco saved Luffy by ordering Vista to stop Mihawk as well, so that makes 3 times saving Luffy.


Luffy saved Zolo and others from Big Mom's Tenjin.




Luffy saved Zolo and Law from Kaido after Kaido Thunder BaguaED both.


Like the rest of the Rooftop, even Killer.


A little scar after telling Law, Zolo will use everything he has and he will finish and Law needs to save his butt after, by warning him its all on Law after Zolo wasting all of his energy, Zolo was out in the end and needed to drink Mink pee to return back fighting and saved by Luffy.

Luffy with superior CoO warned the team something is coming, and then Law saved Zolo by teleporting him to the place where the Rooftop team escaped when Zolo delayed Hakai for 1 second.

Law also helped Zolo several times when Zolo begged Law to teleport him before even Hakai as well.

If Luffy didn't save Zolo from Kaido, Kaido would keep using Thunder Bagua on Zolo until Zolo shit swords from his ass and even drinking 5 liters Mink pee wouldn't save him.







Delusion.

Luffy and Law saved Zolo's ass several times and Zolo was out without Mink Pee and Lanji carrying him around on his shoulder.



WB or anyone else didn't save Marco, and Marco was still fighting.

Marco wasn't even legitimately defeated in Marineford battle, Zolo needed to be saved by Luffy and needed to drink 10 liters of Mink Pee to recover and fight again. Marco was cheap-shotted from behind and returned to the fight in nerfed condition vs. Akainu and was still fighting back.
...
 
#28
This idiotic argument that says "X left Kaidou on the ground for Y time" is pure plot, all the attacks that Luffy used on Kaidou, which by the way managed to knock him down and keep him on the ground for X time, are pure plot. After all, none of those attacks had a greater attack power and penetration than the Over King Kong Gun, and the Over King Kong Gun couldn't even keep Kaidou on the ground for 1 second. So how does that work? The scene in 1010 is pure plot for Law to grab Zoro and get off the roof...

You have cases where Kaidou has less exaggerated reactions to stronger attacks and more exaggerated reactions to weaker attacks, a terrible inconsistency by Oda.

Or we can attribute everything to Kaidou's playful personality, joking around with the food initially like he did with R9, and ultimately, when he returned to his base form, he was actually ready to end the confrontation.

And also, Kaidou's Bagua always targets the opponent's head. Him not hitting Zoro and Law in the head was also pure plot, as they still had a role to fulfill in the war. However, even though he hit Law in a different region of the body, the attack was strong enough to incapacitate Law and make him lose consciousness for X time.
The difference in 1010 is that Luffy's attacks are meant to push and knock back the opponents.
Swords attack are not meant to do that they are a single slash that meant to hurt.

What Zoro meant when he said "i have at least wanted you to fall on your knees" was him thinking his attack would hurt Kaido that much he would fall on his knees from the damage. You can parallel this moment to Oden's attack on Dragon Kaido that from the damage itself Kaido was dropped from the sky to the ground. Which means Zoro's attack wasn't as effective as Oden's.

Now what people keep forgetting is that pre ryuo pre advcoc Luffy was able to drop Kaido on the ground in both Dragon and Human form using G3 and G4. Because these attacks are meant to push and topple the opponent from the impact. They are not a singular point of an attack that causes a serious damage in contact. Kid is a prime example of that he was able to wwe Kaido but it did nothing to him the same applies for Luffy here.

Now who did the most damage in 1010 Zoro or Luffy that is up for debate
 
C

CensoredbyWG

#29
Zoro wouldnt have reached rooftop without marco throwing him there... take that as you will.

Also, yamato and chopper were the MVPs from wano arc, without them the alliance would have died within the first hour of the raid.
 
#30
We don't go claim "ZKK : nonsense or that "Mihawk will solo Buster call and not join anyone to survive NW"

If we're delusional for not believing zoro wank, that's okay
You guys need doctors
Yea instead u belive that guy with WSS title is weaker than Fujitora who is regarded as swordsman:gokulaugh::gokulaugh::gokulaugh: U are ther one that should be seeking for a doctor if u cant read manga for a toddlers
 
C

Cruxroux

#34
We don't go claim "ZKK : nonsense or that "Mihawk will solo Buster call and not join anyone to survive NW"

If we're delusional for not believing zoro wank, that's okay
You guys need doctors
ZKK was the theory you clown 🤡.
And yes mihawk can solo a buster call.
He didn't join because he felt unsafe.
He joined to avoid Unnecessary bloodshed.
 
Top