For Yamato you have to admit its their fault. Yamato was = Oden, I want to join Luffy, Oden, take me to the sea, Oden, I want to leave etc. Did I said Oden already? And the last second: Nope I will stay. It was bullshit
No it wasn't. Like I explained multiple time, Oda is very subtle in his character and Yamato was destined from the start to stay. Nothing justify harrasment.
Yamato will not join, for most people it was not. They were hyped for a new good looking very strong woman.
THe problem is not Oda, its the fanbase and what we are doing here. If the discussion were rationnal and respectfull of the story, people wouldn't be as hype as they are, after all its not the first time Oda hype someone as a redhearing. But by pushing the agenda like we were doing here or in other place like twitter, we are pushing the expectation. I guilty of that too with Carrot.
The difference is that I have always been careful with my audience on twitter about Carrot journey and I keep repeating that this was just a theory, nothing more.
Maybe Oda should have made it more obvious for fan not to be so dispointed (even tho and don't see a lot of those "fan") but it was really not necessary for the story.
Here is a serious question for you: Lets say Yamato does join the crew, wouldnt it be just genius from Oda, that he even tricked someone so smart like you? Ever thought about that? Like I said, double subversive affirmation. What do you think?
This is what you guys keep missunderstanding about me. I'm open to Yamato joining, and if Yamato join, I wouldn't be surprised. Why ? Simply because before joining, there would be obvious signs of her recruitment other than a subversive affirmation. Real sign like for example the development of a post for example or a special skill.
The sad thing is.. I simply can't be surprised about a character joining the crew, because I'm am theorizing and analysing so much about it that I would obviously see all the details related to their future recruitment.
That's why I'm preventing myself from theoryzing beyond the next Nakama, I don't want to spoil the story and I want to keep some surprises.
BEcause their is a simple principle that is important to understand about theorizing. Its that, the closer we will get toward the end, the easier it will be to theorize the story. In fact I predict that in a year or two, at least half the theories about the story will be soonly proven true.
The reason for that is that we are at the end of the story and the differents threads are closing in.
To understand what Isay more clearly, I made a graph
You can see here that at the beginning of the story its quite predictible simply because some trope must be placed into motion like in any story, and the more we approach the second act the more it becomes unpredictible.
Then we enter the second act and the story is quite unpredictible until we start seeing the glimps of the mid point. Here, there must be some radical change and in One Piece this change can be predictible already in the end of thriller bark.
The mid point happens and we dive directly into unpredictibility due to the structure of the story and the way the new world works.
Until the beginning of Wano were unpredictibility start to decrease. Indeed, at the begiining of wano, the threads of the end of the story starts to emerge.
Even more in Egghead. And the threads will keep on reuniting until a point of convergeance at the climax of act 2 (the big battle of One Piece that we are waiting) and the third act should be quite predictible.
That's why, I started saying to theorist to be careful with their revelation as the more we are approaching the end, the easier it will be to predict the end and the different threads of storylines.
Note that this graph also work for arcs (its the same structure) with maybe a little bit more unpredictibility during the midpoint.
i work in one big 3d animated movies in the last 5 year as one of concept artist for charachter design, some streaming series ,and some 3d animated kid show, i also teach charachter design in my local univ, i wont give you any proof, call me bullshit or fraud, im not gonna care.
Its not my place to question your background. I only question your method.
one amateur mistake is, they try cram alot a meaning in their design, which is a big no-no.
I agree with that, which is why I started with a simple checklist for my character. The actual story came after. But in a serie like One Piece, its important to understand that the story comes first and the design MOST OFTEN later. Simply because the mangaka must have his storyline prepared month in advance in order to work on his actual design. If that was not the case, the story would feel completely unjointed (I don't know if that's a good word for that idea)
if your charachter have meaning for everything from begining, that mean they doesnt have any room to grow and destined to be a side charachter.
When I'm talking about a character having a story, I do not mean that the creator must have all the story planned in his mind (even if that's better) but rather big characterization parameters that will allow to milk the theme of the story through the character and the design.
Of course, you need to keep some room for shapes iterations and silhouets.
the story are made to justified the design, not the other way around.
Oh no. Not at all. And I'm sorry but if you are teaching that to your studient, you will lead them to do very bad work at the end.
THe story is ALWAYS the prime directive. EVEN if that story just take the shape of simple characterization points like (joyfull / Royalty / Ressourcefull etc.)
Design without story is meaningless.
You really need to understand that by story I can talk about the background of a character, but I also talk about the FONCTION and THE CHARACTERIZATION of a design.
For example, when you create a room, you must always have in mind fonction first. This is the "chracterization" of the room. Same for a vehicule, and same for a character.
You should know that as a concept artist. Or maybe you know that but we are not using the same words.
so despite how much you think luffy hat mean freedom , sanji eyebrow mean all blue or zoro 3sword mean something, its totally not.
No. Sanji's eyesbrow don't mean all blue, they are just a reference to food. Its the fonction of this design.
But for the rest, I'm sorry, but they are, despite what you can think.
oda didnt plan anything from begining
Of course, that would take a God to do such a things.
or roger also somehow wear luffy strawhat
I wouldn't be so sure about that.
Lets take for example the project I'm working on. If I do things correctly, the project should take pretty much as long as One Piece, despite that. I'm actually working on the end and very little detail about the end of the story. Why ? Because this is the best way to create a story (or rather, the most efficient way). Meaning that even if it can be surprising, Oda can actually had in mind such things as the way Vegapunk is dressedup at the very BEGINNING of his writing process for One Piece. It all depends on what he needed to write at this points to create a powerfull ending.
i bet you also read one piece log and know how lucci randomly picked to be cp9 from bunch of shipwright charachter.
Well, there will always be randomness in a creative work and I'm glad for that.
-put her around charachter you imagine her hang out with ( lets say shp in this case) in their debut cloth/ or after2 year cloth, do she look natural with them ?or she look over/under designed around them?
-draw her without wearing anything, are most her charachterization still noticable?
-draw her with totally different cloth without any similar color scheme. do she still retain her charachterization?
if all three answer is yes, that mean your chara have good design.
thats all, you may agree or not agree, but i wouldnt bother to reply anymore.
I agree with that and the answer is yes in all cases. Simply because I gave her specific design shapes that are not too out of this world and in the meantimes, shapes that can be recognized easily.
In that case its the weird devil crown, her weapon, her skin color and her long braid. Something that is almost non existent in One Piece.
It would actually be very hopefull. I just gave you the setup. But with the arrival of the strawhat, this setup would transform in a story where the character actually learn to pardon herself. It would be a similar situation that Luffy faced in Wano with the sick prisonner. This character is enslaved to her devil fruit and would actually refused until the last moment to control it by fear. This would be the overpower over fear.
But looking at One Piece, its really not that dark lol. We have seen worse.
Also, I think Hitori’s character design is a bit too detailed with all of those accessories, which can result in a character being too distracting.
I actually agree with that. That's one of my technical problem, I lack the principle of simplification of design. I'm too tempted to add accessories.
You want to find a balance where a character can blend in with those around them without taking focus away, and I think simplifying the design a bit would help with this.
Agreed.