Nowhere did I say ACoC was confirmed, I said default assumptionis that was CoC. Simple as, haki flow post adCoC reveal = assumed to be CoC until proven otherwise.
Garp's pattern and Coby's pattern is identical, only difference is Garp has larger streaks. Both have sharp streaks whereas Luffy's initial reveal looked like it was "flowing"
Nowhere did I say ACoC was confirmed, I said default assumptionis that was CoC until proven otherwise. Simple as, haki flow post CoC reveal = assumed to be CoC until proven otherwise.
And therein lies your problem, it isn't the default assumption, not even close to it.
Lightning sparks have never been indicative of ACoC, again, we've seen non-ACoC users do that, the only surefire way to say if a person has ACoC is if they do what these characters did, that's it
Neither is Garp's, there is no consistency here. I'm just gonna assume any haki flow imbued in an attack before it lands post aCoC reveal is CoC coating or at the very least involves CoC.
I know zoro has it, but vivre cards are legendary known for getting things wrong or just outright ignore stuff. Even with this they refuse to add CoC to Zoro’s attributes
Idk why people use the SFX “zzt “ or “.zat” to say if it’s Advanced CoC when it’s has been used on non advanced CoC user and Non CoC user like Kidd and law.
black lighting also isn’t enough because characters like jimbei also it’s used black lighting like CoC user
SFX + black lighting isn’t even enough because ulti also have used it against luffy
i don’t see gaban having CoC let alone advance CoC but we must admit oda failed to separate CoA and CoC because we don’t know who is using CoC or not.
the only way to know if it knocks out the people around you or the is massive black trail like the elders
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.