Did Kanjuro Kill Big Mom?


  • Total voters
    325
Status
Not open for further replies.
So basically you agree with king not even fighting her resulting in her being more affected than her ACTUALLY fighting kidd and law? Correct? So basically kidd and law on the roof pushing bigmom off when she needed to be saved by Prometheus from drowning (kaido had to attack broken bone zoro since zoro dicing Prometheus) was more substantial than what they did this chapter?
Your whole premise was that King was more impressive because he left her with amnesia while Kid and Law didn't even knock her unconscious, which makes zero sense because King wasn't impressive nor knocked her unconscious but the water did while Kid and Law are facing her directly; an enough amount of water will always be more impressive against a devil fruit user than even the strongest top tier ever will in a land fight. But King? He did nothing but disbalance a vulnerable ship on top of a waterfall.

You aren't fooling anybody with this dumbass logic trick of yours.
 
Your whole premise was that King was more impressive because he left her with amnesia while Kid and Law didn't even knock her unconscious, which makes zero sense because King wasn't impressive nor knocked her unconscious but the water did. And an enough amount of water will always be more impressive against a devil fruit user than even the strongest top tier ever will in a land fight. But King? He did nothing but disbalance a vulnerable ship on top of a waterfall.

You aren't fooling anybody with this dumbass logic trick of yours.
Let' us break down why your point was so dumb:

Did an outside force result in the reasoning as to why bigmom got amnesia when king hit her and her crew? Yes.

Is an outside force going to result in the reasoning as to why bigmom may be possibly koed and not law or kidds attacks on her? Yes and that's if the bombs take her out

You see why even trying to defend your point was dumb? Kidd and law fought and an outside force still had to result in how they won and that's if she is koed while the same outside force when king hit her Resulted in her being olin'd. So before you make a illogical statement I advise you read what the person has actually said before responding
 
Last edited:
1. The benefit of him taking luffys damage was to show that he actually had the physical ability to take it. And to show his loyalty to us as the reader. He showed the readers that he valued luffys dream as much if not even more so than his own. Which showed character development since zoro originally told luffy that if he got in the way of his dream that he would end him. Both were pay offs in the long game

2. The fight had ended as a result. So him taking said damage was beneficial since kuma left as a result

3. Nonsense. Again IF ODA HAD NO OTHER PURPOSE FOR ZORO HE WOULD NOT EVEN HAD INTRODUCED THE GRIM REAPER SITUATION OR THE AFTER AFFECTS OF THE DRUG. He would have simply had one of the strawhats find him (chopper) and carry him somewhere safe with zoro remaining unconscious for the rest of wano because of the amount of pain he was in. He could have done the same thing with zoro in which he did with him in the whole kamazo fight. Oda specifically in this instance chose not to do so

No, you just don't like the other explanations I've given you. Grim reaper could tie to Ryuma. It could tie to Enma. It could tie to anything in the fucking book, it does NOT have to mean he's recovering for your fan wish.

Do you even comprehend the blind biased words you are typing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top