News One Piece Live Action Series!!
- Thread starter Tyki_Mikk
- Start date
- Tags alabasta season two when chad coby garp actor folds both sanji and zoro actor hot alvida incoming lol love action
Yes, its important. But its only a small portion of what makes a character a character narratively. Like I said, about 20 to 30 %, the rest being the characterization of the character both real and symbolic, the story of said character, the interactions in between this character and other and everything potentially non controlable that can add to the weight of the character (the "aura" element).
The looks is important to set the first introduction, but its the rest that hold the potential for a character for an author.
I've not seen the french adaptation of City Hunter but I've heard that its not only true to the look, its also true to the character, hence why it was a "success" at least among fans.
Looks takes you so far. If the character doesn't have strong narrative basis, it will just be a pretty boy or a pretty girl.
I'm talking about non-white character, not necessarily "black" people. I don't know about the Cleopatra controversy.
But basically, its logical - because of environmental conditions and biology - to expect non white people in very Sunny countries in stories. So having non white people in Alabasta doesn't shock me and nor does Vivi being non white doesn't shock me either.
In fact, its a refreashing choice. We are used to see Vivi in a certain way and now we can have a new look at her. This choice would really not be a problem for me. Plus, she looks amazing so... yeah.. No bad here.
Yeah, and they are both georgous. If they have good acting skills, what's the problem ?
Accurate Vivi, is a Vivi that is true to the narration of Vivi in the Manga, the look is only the narrative surface and the color of Vivi's skin pays absolutely no role in the story just as much as the skin of Luffy is completely unimportant, again, the look is secondary. Especially if the author is behind the choice.
That would be too costly.
But we could image a world where the actors are replaced just like in the Witcher.
But I don't really see how anyone can top the positivity of Inaki Godoy in this role.
The looks is important to set the first introduction, but its the rest that hold the potential for a character for an author.
I've not seen the french adaptation of City Hunter but I've heard that its not only true to the look, its also true to the character, hence why it was a "success" at least among fans.
Looks takes you so far. If the character doesn't have strong narrative basis, it will just be a pretty boy or a pretty girl.
I'm talking about non-white character, not necessarily "black" people. I don't know about the Cleopatra controversy.
But basically, its logical - because of environmental conditions and biology - to expect non white people in very Sunny countries in stories. So having non white people in Alabasta doesn't shock me and nor does Vivi being non white doesn't shock me either.
In fact, its a refreashing choice. We are used to see Vivi in a certain way and now we can have a new look at her. This choice would really not be a problem for me. Plus, she looks amazing so... yeah.. No bad here.
Yeah, and they are both georgous. If they have good acting skills, what's the problem ?
Accurate Vivi, is a Vivi that is true to the narration of Vivi in the Manga, the look is only the narrative surface and the color of Vivi's skin pays absolutely no role in the story just as much as the skin of Luffy is completely unimportant, again, the look is secondary. Especially if the author is behind the choice.
That would be too costly.
But we could image a world where the actors are replaced just like in the Witcher.
But I don't really see how anyone can top the positivity of Inaki Godoy in this role.
