So people consider the magazine canon when it says things like King is a Swordsman and Kaido has a mythical zoan, But when it says katakuri was stronger than luffy and luffys not proud that his strength was not enough to beat the guy, its not? u cant pick and choose what you want to be canon from these sources. Its either all canon or not.
Character Discussion One Piece Magazine 10: Don't Trust Shit Translations
except thats not what it said
katakuri win isnt any more different than how luffy beat doflamingo
how luffy beat cracker
or how luffy beat enel
there was always questionable factors involved
what the story made clear was at the point he went down, they were at least equal. the sooner folks accept that the better for you lot.
its nor hard. its written right there in the story.
Post automatically merged:
katakuri win isnt any more different than how luffy beat doflamingo
how luffy beat cracker
or how luffy beat enel
there was always questionable factors involved
what the story made clear was at the point he went down, they were at least equal. the sooner folks accept that the better for you lot.
its nor hard. its written right there in the story.
Are you talking to me specifically? Have you seen Me specifically ever say the magazines are canon when it isn't direct word from Oda?
Oda does add things in the magazine. Like the devil fruit designs are obviously by Oda himself so they are canon. But the magazine isn't made by Oda. About 3-5% of the shit in it is directly from oda so the rest isn't canon.
The one time I have quoted the magazine as canon is when the quote was directly from oda. When Oda said he refused to draw a reader request because the reader wanted him draw Zoro messing up a sword technique. Oda said "Don't disrespect Zoro"
That is a direct comment from Oda and that's how you know it's canon. Or you can use the manga itself. Like how the manga clearly has King as a swordsman. That's how you tell what's canon
Oda does add things in the magazine. Like the devil fruit designs are obviously by Oda himself so they are canon. But the magazine isn't made by Oda. About 3-5% of the shit in it is directly from oda so the rest isn't canon.
The one time I have quoted the magazine as canon is when the quote was directly from oda. When Oda said he refused to draw a reader request because the reader wanted him draw Zoro messing up a sword technique. Oda said "Don't disrespect Zoro"
That is a direct comment from Oda and that's how you know it's canon. Or you can use the manga itself. Like how the manga clearly has King as a swordsman. That's how you tell what's canon
D
not drawn by Oda though
almost completely off, the request was "Rayleigh laughing at Zoro who's in a tough situation as the user of the rubber fruit", and Oda said something along the lines of "but my actual drawing become something different from the request, Zoro was using the ability smoothly and no one is able to laugh at him, I think it's fine this way!!"
almost completely off, the request was "Rayleigh laughing at Zoro who's in a tough situation as the user of the rubber fruit", and Oda said something along the lines of "but my actual drawing become something different from the request, Zoro was using the ability smoothly and no one is able to laugh at him, I think it's fine this way!!"
