damn the omgus
ur defense of him was awful
"keep him alive bc he is mc"
"ainz isnt going to be a fake role"
etc.
there was a lack of progression leading up to ur switch later too
Also you're saying it's awful without due context. Day 1 i had Ekko as town because I thought he and Michelle were possible Masons. I agreed that he was unlikely to send the message and have several posts explaining why there is little motivation for Ekko as scum to send a message like that, but lots of motivation for someone to fake the message to frame him. You're acting like this part of the read just doesn't exist, I'm assuming you have good reason for this? I would love to hear it.
Coming into Day 2 after seeing he had claimed Ains, I said it was far too risky to lynch into that claim on the basis of the evidence, which as far as I could see, was the message (which I already outlined my issues with). Fuji loves characters like Ains, there is no way he was not going to be in the game and from what Ekko had claimed there was not much chance of him being Mafia. I ultimately ended up turning on him because when I stepped back and looked at his pushes, especially the Boq push, I found myself unconvinced on them. You'll also note that I did concede the possibility that Ains was a Serial/Indie before any of this too.
So here is where I'm at hime. I'm having a hard time buying your reasoning as genuine because it seems to be in bad faith to me, willfully ignorant of crucial context in order to settle on a position that you think makes sense for you to come to. I believe I've shored up your contention so I'd like you to reconcile the issues I have with your reasoning, can then move past this and just lynch Aurelian like I kinda wanted to yesterday.