Lmao you wish. But even in the improbable case that you did, "the political me" of 2 years ago and "the political me" of today are two completely different person. Like I said, you have no idea what you are talking about at the moment. Trust me, do not even try. You wouldn't get it anyway.



And yet, you make claims that are not even acceptable for newly arrived leftists to have. Like I said, you only know the surface, not the substance. As such, you are confusing the violence of leftists with rightists violences, completely ignoring that behind said violence, there are ethics which are not present in rightism. Meaning that you are delivering a moral opinion, blind of contextual & material realities
claims such as what
 
Lmao you wish. But even in the improbable case that you did, "the political me" of 2 years ago and "the political me" of today are two completely different person. Like I said, you have no idea what you are talking about at the moment. Trust me, do not even try. You wouldn't get it anyway.
“Improbable” blud all you have to do is look it up in this thread lol

You claiming to be a different person 2 or 3 years ago is not the flex you think it is. Either you were talking about politics despite being clueless or your political views are so flexible the change on a whim. Either way it just proves we shouldn’t take you seriously
 

CoC: Color of Clowns

Whacky Arm Waving Inflatable Imu-chan


Thankfully, Republicans are known for their honesty, I'm sure they'll GTFO real quick.

Same way they said they'd release the Epstein List... before they said it was a Democrat hoax... and the list was full of Democrats like Bill Clinton... despite not existing... hmmmmmmm... The non-existent Client List the Democrats made up to incriminate themselves proves the Republicans would NEVER LIE. It's just three lies humping each other at the same time. Ohhhh, sorry, that's the Abrahamic Religions collabing to bomb starving kids.

The difference between the German Nationalists and American Nationalists?

The Germans weren't live streaming their genocides, and most of the public didn't know about the Holocaust until post-World-War-2.

Somehow I think live streaming genocide is worse, but, hey, not surprised the people that can't understand that more people live in cities than the countryside, and therefore are too mentally-conservative to understand elections maps, can't count, and admit we've murdered way more than 6 millions Muslims by now. Get ready for a lot of Patri-Rots and White Supremacist Terrorists to tell you why they want to murder the VERY DANGEROUS Muslim man who wants to feed poor people and not kill them, then tell you the "Left" is violent, when they're the ones live streaming genocide.

Glad to see Muslims in America acting like Jesus, when "Christians" are sucking up to the cult made by the Romans 300 years after they tortured Jesus to death, as controlled opposition. Good for the people who voted for Christ's values over Christianity's tyranny. I hope all of the scripture the Vatican censored comes out with all of their sex crimes and other crimes against humanity.

My favorite thing about Mamdani is his smile. Very real, loving smile. I wish him the best, since a lot of racists, who would be in jail if they weren't rich and white, are going to whine about how annoying it is this Muslim guy is so much hotter, cooler, and likeable than they are.



Dude is too high energy for the party that can't handle the emotions of adult women, and prefers silent child brides instead
 
Such as these:
>>

-Abortion I'm iffy on. Recently I've been thinking they should probably just keep the kid.
-Meritocracy seems fine.
-Reverse racism exists, but it is by no means as big as normal racism. Not by a long shot. I still don't support it though.
-Acab is nonsense
+ this last one about the horseshoe theory. These are not leftists claims, they are rightist ones and I would go even farther if you haven't made more progressive claim at the same time. Which means that basically, your position is a big confusion between leftist and rightists values. You need to clear the field to move on politically and become a leftist. I'm willing to help, but you need to listen to people like me.

“Improbable” blud all you have to do is look it up in this thread lol
Whether it's true or not does not matter as explained, when I started this thread, I was stayin away from marxism, it's not the case anymore.


You claiming to be a different person 2 or 3 years ago is not the flex you think it is.
Oh really? Do you like not evolving? Not learning stuff?


Either you were talking about politics despite being clueless or your political views are so flexible the change on a whim.
The flexibility of my political view is not a secret. I always explained how my mind can absorb new political idea while keeping its coherency. I project - if you look back - my current political position and I project that in the near future, I will learn more and will be even more radical and revolutionary. Simply because this is a path that I'm accepting to take because I know it's the right path.


Either way it just proves we shouldn’t take you seriously
On the contrary, you should observe closely. If I can teach you anything, it's to be always ready to be wrong & accept new ways of thinking. To the question: "What ways?" The answer is for you to find. I recommend a scientific, materialist & ethical approach. Start simple, don't go radical, learn basic ideas, politicize slowly, take your time to learn. You will see, the world gonna open before your eyes.
 
Such as these:
>>


+ this last one about the horseshoe theory. These are not leftists claims, they are rightist ones and I would go even farther if you haven't made more progressive claim at the same time. Which means that basically, your position is a big confusion between leftist and rightists values. You need to clear the field to move on politically and become a leftist. I'm willing to help, but you need to listen to people like me.


Whether it's true or not does not matter as explained, when I started this thread, I was stayin away from marxism, it's not the case anymore.



Oh really? Do you like not evolving? Not learning stuff?



The flexibility of my political view is not a secret. I always explained how my mind can absorb new political idea while keeping its coherency. I project - if you look back - my current political position and I project that in the near future, I will learn more and will be even more radical and revolutionary. Simply because this is a path that I'm accepting to take because I know it's the right path.



On the contrary, you should observe closely. If I can teach you anything, it's to be always ready to be wrong & accept new ways of thinking. To the question: "What ways?" The answer is for you to find. I recommend a scientific, materialist & ethical approach. Start simple, don't go radical, learn basic ideas, politicize slowly, take your time to learn. You will see, the world gonna open before your eyes.
Bro you’re like 36 years old, your world views shouldn’t drastically change to the point where you’re entirely different person

Being open to change doesn’t mean you drastically change every other week
 
Such as these:
>>


+ this last one about the horseshoe theory. These are not leftists claims, they are rightist ones and I would go even farther if you haven't made more progressive claim at the same time. Which means that basically, your position is a big confusion between leftist and rightists values. You need to clear the field to move on politically and become a leftist. I'm willing to help, but you need to listen to people like me.


Whether it's true or not does not matter as explained, when I started this thread, I was stayin away from marxism, it's not the case anymore.



Oh really? Do you like not evolving? Not learning stuff?



The flexibility of my political view is not a secret. I always explained how my mind can absorb new political idea while keeping its coherency. I project - if you look back - my current political position and I project that in the near future, I will learn more and will be even more radical and revolutionary. Simply because this is a path that I'm accepting to take because I know it's the right path.



On the contrary, you should observe closely. If I can teach you anything, it's to be always ready to be wrong & accept new ways of thinking. To the question: "What ways?" The answer is for you to find. I recommend a scientific, materialist & ethical approach. Start simple, don't go radical, learn basic ideas, politicize slowly, take your time to learn. You will see, the world gonna open before your eyes.
Do you believe that one, leftists need to agree on everything to be leftists (utter nonsense, it's like saying you can't be an one piece fan if you don't like it after the timeskip)
And two, stuff like "reverse racism isn't real" and acab is something leftists actually want people to believe?
 
Bro you’re like 36 years old, your world views shouldn’t drastically change to the point where you’re entirely different person

Being open to change doesn’t mean you drastically change every other week
Who made you think that your evolution needed to stop at 40? Dude, if I can keep that mindset, keep evolving & learning stuff until I'm dead, my life will be a success. Our systems made you believe that accepting change was a weakness, when it's one of the biggest strength you can have. Do not even think for 1 second that you are being wise just by sticking to constructed opinions from 10 years ago.


Being open to change doesn’t mean you drastically change every other week
Of course. That's why I'm talking about political opinions here, i'm not talking about personnality.

I dont think it was his point that they are leftists in his example, just that your intention being good doesnt necessarily lead to your actions being good.
That is true, that's why there is a difference between leftist and their actions. A leftist can depict reactionary behaviors. But when said behavior start to change the way they thinks or when their material condition do, then the person stops being a leftist and start becoming what rightists are. Reactionaries.


Do you believe that one, leftists need to agree on everything to be leftists
I did not ask these questions about your values randomly. But because the answer to these are fundamental to understand the state of the entire belief system of a person in the current paradigm. Which means that the answer to these question was fundamental to understand if you aligned with leftists interests or not. And in your case, it's a big blob of confusion.

(utter nonsense, it's like saying you can't be an one piece fan if you don't like it after the timeskip)
Well.. I'm glad you are talking about it. Because it question the notion of "being a fan". Because being a One Piece fan while trashing half of the story for no reason (because let's be honest, there are no good reasons here) it's not really being a One Piece fan, it's being a "fan of the first and earliest version of One Piece" One Piece is a full story. If you only like a portion of a cake, you don't like the cake.


And two, stuff like "reverse racism isn't real" and acab is something leftists actually want people to believe?
Yeah. It's actually pretty basic stuff. But your reject of both of these is showing that you do not understand - even after me explaining these concepts to you - what both of these means. OR that you do understand but you do not agree, which is even worse and would be a testimony of your rightist alignment.

It's beliefs like that that pretty much led to Leftists losing Gen Z all over the West lmao
Nah, it's the opposite.
 
Last edited:
Who made you think that your evolution needed to stop at 40? Dude, if I can keep that mindset, keep evolving & learning stuff until I'm dead, my life will be a success. Our systems made you believe that accepting change was a weakness, when it's one of the biggest strength you can have. Do not even think for 1 second that you are being wise just by sticking to constructed opinions from 10 years ago.



Of course. That's why I'm talking about political opinions here, i'm not talking about personnality.


That is true, that's why there is a difference between leftist and their actions. A leftist can depict reactionary behaviors. But when said behavior start to change the way they thinks, then the person stops being a leftist and start becoming what rightists are. Reactionaries.



I did not ask these questions about your values randomly. But because the answer to these are fundamental to understand the state of the entire belief system of a person in the current paradigm. Which means that the answer to these question was fundamental to understand if you aligned with leftists interests or not. And in your case, it's a big blob of confusion.


Well.. I'm glad you are talking about it. Because it question the notion of "being a fan". Because being a One Piece fan while trashing half of the story for no reason (because let's be honest, there are no good reasons here) it's not really being a One Piece fan, it's being a "fan of the first and earliest version of One Piece" One Piece is a full story. If you only like a portion of a cake, you don't like the cake.



Yeah. It's actually pretty basic stuff. But your reject of both of these is showing that you do not understand - even after me explaining these concepts to you - what both of these means. OR that you do understand but you do not agree, which is even worse and would be a testimony of your rightist alignment.


Nah, it's the opposite.
If it's fine for us to generalize all cops based off a few of them being bad people then it's fine for racists to generalize all black people based off a few of them being bad people
Do you like the sound of that?
 
It's important to understand the world in term of material and class interests. Being a leftist is not only having leftist opinions, it's also and more than anything having opinions that are in alignment with the interest of the oppressed class, or dominated groups of people. Being a rightist is the opposite. Being a rightist means having opinion & thus material interest that align AGAINST these groups of people.


If it's fine for us to generalize all cops based off a few of them being bad people then it's fine for racists to generalize all black people based off a few of them being bad people
Do you like the sound of that?
As I thought, for this one, you do not understand the concept or the materialist reasoning behind the concept. I'm willing to explain, but you need to pay attention. Because it's important.
 
though he's likely right wing judging off what he's said on this forum)
He pushed Kamala agenda pre elections
The difference between the German Nationalists and American Nationalists?
The German ones lost because their country was defeated in a war.* No one can give Murica a military defeat.


*and not even this ended their existence. Nazis were put in high positions right after the war ended and never left, the allies allowed this. Which shows us that the allies never had an actual issue with Nazism. What pissed them off was being attacked and potentially conquered by Germany. How could the allies possibly be appalled by Nazism? They themselves had and still have colonies and profited off of slavery. They could do whatever they wanted in Africa, north America, the Pacific, India, Siberia but as soon as one of their fellow European nations decided to attack other European nations it suddenly became a problem and their leader History'sMostEvilMan™.

Mamdani is the whitest guy in the picture
 
It's important to understand the world in term of material and class interests. Being a leftist is not only having leftist opinions, it's also and more than anything having opinions that are in alignment with the interest of the oppressed class, or dominated groups of people. Being a rightist is the opposite. Being a rightist means having opinion & thus material interest that align AGAINST these groups of people.



As I thought, for this one, you do not understand the concept or the materialist reasoning behind the concept. I'm willing to explain, but you need to pay attention. Because it's important.
And you do not "buzzword buzzword buzzword" either.
 
Top