Several things to unpack here:
1. 'Not wanting it' is ultimately, in summary, 100% of abortions. There is far more nuance to it than that.
2. Life is hard no matter what - even elites have their trials and tribulations, correct, but not everybody spends their childhood in poverty, or with abusive parents, or without parents, or in households where substance abuse is common, or in and out of foster care. The likelihood of this occurring in a child where the mother preferred to abort but didn't is magnitudes higher. It impacts not only the child but the mother. Abortions are about two lives, not one.
3. Are there? Which programs are these? Do they actually do their job well? Most disabilities aren't even apparent until birth or very close to birth; abortions are rarely if ever because of a recognised disability during scans. If you're so willing to dismiss concerns for babies of rape etc. (which are valid concerns), why are you raising equally if not less common contributors to abortions?
4. Yes, and that includes consequences to forcing a woman to term through banning abortion - yet weirdly you aren't considering this side of the coin at all.
5. Probably because the vast majority of people enjoy having sex. Contraception is not perfect. Not everyone has access to contraception either and that problem will only get worse in the US if Justice Clarence Thomas gets his way.
Thoughts?
Sorry for asking my 'deranged' questions
@Roo over here thinks he's a psychiatrist so I guess I must be deranged