[FNZ] Salem of Lies Round 17: Town of Madness, Sadness, and Lies
- Status
THAT PART I DIDN'T. IT WASN'T THERE WHEN I READ IT. BUT NOW IT'S THERE. ZEHAHAHAHAHA.
AGAIN, GUARDIAN ANGEL, WHERE YOU AT NOW? THRE'S NO REASON TO HIDE YOURSELF. BEST TO COME OUT NOW OR WE ACCIDENTALLY LYNCH YOU FOR BEING LOWKEY PROTECTING A POTENTIAL SCUM IN REJ.
lololol
Transported N1 - Queen and ????
Transported N2 - Queen and Tris
Roleblocked N1 - ????
Roleblocked N2 - Tris
Jailed N1 - Tobi
Jailed N2 - ????
AGAIN, GUARDIAN ANGEL, WHERE YOU AT NOW? THRE'S NO REASON TO HIDE YOURSELF. BEST TO COME OUT NOW OR WE ACCIDENTALLY LYNCH YOU FOR BEING LOWKEY PROTECTING A POTENTIAL SCUM IN REJ.
Post automatically merged:
lololol
Post automatically merged:
Transported N1 - Queen and ????
Transported N2 - Queen and Tris
Roleblocked N1 - ????
Roleblocked N2 - Tris
Jailed N1 - Tobi
Jailed N2 - ????
Hmm.
So with that, I assume you're clean.
I wonder what mafia line up is if there are no other players rbd on a.single night.
Could be GF, Mafioso, Consig.
@LANJI CUCKSMOKE where were you at last night? Don't role claim, just tell us who you visited.
So with that, I assume you're clean.
I wonder what mafia line up is if there are no other players rbd on a.single night.
Could be GF, Mafioso, Consig.
@LANJI CUCKSMOKE where were you at last night? Don't role claim, just tell us who you visited.
The list of players narrows down but my suspicion over TAC is still burning bright. I have never witnessed such a degree of passivity and inconsistency in my whole WG Mafia experience from him.
It has to be noted that the wagon on Tobi formed too rapidly. There has to be a few scums who participated to it honestly, I find it logically appealing odds wise. I can see a Mafia and in general a scum exploiting players weaknesses' down, the more they are visible they highter chance, and Tobi had displayed a few flaws in his gamestyle. I was skeptical about his lynch, but merely in that his style was reminding me of my past. But I bet antitowns unlikely displayed substantial hesitations.
There's one thing I find unsettling about TAC's behaviour nevertheless. His vote on Tobi felt like a joke and yet it was counted. So perhaps it was no joke after all. And then TAC votes innocent, what does this mean? That he has undertaken an hypocritical position honestly. In fact he never removed that vote of his before the lynch could take place.
I would like to stand by my position for now, I don't truly mind if not many players found it logical so far.
Vote Lynch TAC @Melontonin
It has to be noted that the wagon on Tobi formed too rapidly. There has to be a few scums who participated to it honestly, I find it logically appealing odds wise. I can see a Mafia and in general a scum exploiting players weaknesses' down, the more they are visible they highter chance, and Tobi had displayed a few flaws in his gamestyle. I was skeptical about his lynch, but merely in that his style was reminding me of my past. But I bet antitowns unlikely displayed substantial hesitations.
There's one thing I find unsettling about TAC's behaviour nevertheless. His vote on Tobi felt like a joke and yet it was counted. So perhaps it was no joke after all. And then TAC votes innocent, what does this mean? That he has undertaken an hypocritical position honestly. In fact he never removed that vote of his before the lynch could take place.
I would like to stand by my position for now, I don't truly mind if not many players found it logical so far.
Vote Lynch TAC @Melontonin
These are some wallie coming from you and I am not always a fan of big posters because most of the times, scums hide their behaviour in the depths of the waters to tryna negate players from reading it. You are more experienced than half of the players here combined and I found it quite amusing how your accussation against TAC is somewhat similar to what you did yesterday when I was running the lynch on Tobi and you chose to lynch somebody else instead where it was not going anywhere unless you truly convinced half of the players to switch votes in a matter of couple of hours.
You still haven't explain the significance of your vote yesterday.
I called you out few times last day and even alarmed the invest roles to come at you at night just so we can see through you.
Your vote on TAC doesn't hold waters at all. He was clearly participative and not passive just how you accused him. I can see through TAC if meta play is concerned as I have managed to cause his demise if the last 3 games I played against him. I don't see him as scum at this point.
What bugs me is your infinite attempt to ignore my thoughts against you.
Interesting.
@Vigilante, if we are not able to find any leads or unable to cap it, I want you to eradicate my friend Lanji here.
LOOKOUT here, you visited TAC and not Zara. :)
You still haven't explain the significance of your vote yesterday.
I called you out few times last day and even alarmed the invest roles to come at you at night just so we can see through you.
Your vote on TAC doesn't hold waters at all. He was clearly participative and not passive just how you accused him. I can see through TAC if meta play is concerned as I have managed to cause his demise if the last 3 games I played against him. I don't see him as scum at this point.
What bugs me is your infinite attempt to ignore my thoughts against you.
Interesting.
@Vigilante, if we are not able to find any leads or unable to cap it, I want you to eradicate my friend Lanji here.
LOOKOUT here, you visited TAC and not Zara. :)
- Status