[FNZ] Super Role Madness [Season 2] Round 14 - Tower of Druaga

Status
Not open for further replies.

MangoSenpai

Arbiter of Truth
Vote Count

Voters

RippedCal: TAC
Flower: TAC
T-pein: RippedCal> ConquistadoR
ZoroSlaysDragonTuna: TAC
TAC: Rhea (Ripped)
Nick: RippedCal> ConquistadoR
Jaguark: ConquistadoR
Destroya: TAC
MistyCat: ConquistadoR


Votes

TAC: 4
ConquistadoR: 4
RippedCal: 1

Non-Voters

ConquistadoR
Rej:
Dr_Professor83:
Ratchet:
Grammaton:
Gruble:
Ryu Kishi:
Adam 🍎
Alibaba
Zolo
Don DaSlayer
Gambit
Midnight Delight
Melontonin
Ryu Kishi
Dr_Professor

The vote tally will not reflect any vote manipulation(if any)
If there is a mistake let me know.


I feel like it’s ridiculous that TAC is leading. I think gram is alright atm so I’d rather go with one of the others.

vote lynch ripped
I say you got it. Didn’t find jinri doing much either so I’ll take your word on ripped for now.

change vote lynch conq
Vote lynch ConquistadoR
Kk I can live with this lynch

vote lynch Conq
aight lets get it.

vote lynch ripped Cal
I'd go Gram or TAC tbh... Gram only because I know he has a big scum range , what is Jinri scum range? One of them three has to be scum, i wish the odds were more in our favor

For now i'll place on brother TAC

Vote Lynch TAC

 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
See i have a problem with that

So Ekko said he lied and you still feel threatened by it enough so to almost insta claim watching yourself.

And then you claim watching yourself - by all means a move that makes no sense

What were you hoping to find out? I see no action that could have been done on to you that you could say to us here

And on top of that almost insta claiming for little to no regard in setting up a bit on someone?


Your NA feels so off and very weird
Ekko said he lied AFTER I claimed.
Why does watching myself make no sense? And to be honest, I only didn't reveal this because I assumed you bought my claim - what did you target me with, Adam?

You clearly haven't read the passage of play that led to this, and you're using ad hoc reasoning to discredit what I'm saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top