Powers & Abilities So Yamato gets ACoC but Kid doesn't
- Thread starter Monkey D Theories
- Start date
Wrong oda doesn't just give one meaning for titles.
The fact is
Zoro sanji etc all actually won their fights and just had their names no Epithets
The two fights where there wasn't a clear win
Law and kidd
And kaidos hit on luffy cause of cp0
Oda specifically put both their Epithets
This isn't coincidence
The fact is
Zoro sanji etc all actually won their fights and just had their names no Epithets
The two fights where there wasn't a clear win
Law and kidd
And kaidos hit on luffy cause of cp0
Oda specifically put both their Epithets
This isn't coincidence
Thanks for bringing my quote, man; I can't believe people are still trying the "winners need no epithet" argument.
Oda NEVER wrote that "winners need no tsusho"; he wrote that "winners need no makurakotoba", two completely different words and concepts. For real, people, just stop making a fool of yourself and do the minimum effort of checking what the original language is actually saying instead of blindly relying on translations to an English you don't even understand proprely (hence why you also fall for the illiteracy of believing "epithet" has one universal meaning).
I mean, Kaidou referring to stuff like "Surgeon of death" or "Captain" doesn't even make sense in-verse; such epithets don't fit at all in what the emperor reflected about. What a weird, disturbed way of interpreting text.
You don't know what you are talking about. "Wrong oda doesn't just give meaning for titles", what the heck does this even mean? The only reason why you think of this as "titles" is because you are poor at understanding English and only rely on translations instead of checking the original text where two different concepts are addressed with two different words.
Nowhere is Oda saying that "winners need no epithet", that's only the translation. And even then we have two meanings of "epithet" that can't be interchanged just because you feel like it.
Oda NEVER wrote that "winners need no tsusho"; he wrote that "winners need no makurakotoba", two completely different words and concepts. For real, people, just stop making a fool of yourself and do the minimum effort of checking what the original language is actually saying instead of blindly relying on translations to an English you don't even understand proprely (hence why you also fall for the illiteracy of believing "epithet" has one universal meaning).
I mean, Kaidou referring to stuff like "Surgeon of death" or "Captain" doesn't even make sense in-verse; such epithets don't fit at all in what the emperor reflected about. What a weird, disturbed way of interpreting text.
Post automatically merged:
You don't know what you are talking about. "Wrong oda doesn't just give meaning for titles", what the heck does this even mean? The only reason why you think of this as "titles" is because you are poor at understanding English and only rely on translations instead of checking the original text where two different concepts are addressed with two different words.
Nowhere is Oda saying that "winners need no epithet", that's only the translation. And even then we have two meanings of "epithet" that can't be interchanged just because you feel like it.
Last edited:
Kid was a sadness. We see people saying he loses to Sanji and Doflamingo due to lack of mobility, people saying he only controls metals and nothing else, people saying he's a turtle, people saying he doesn't have that much AP and Law turned BM into an amoeba . It was the character that Oda shit the most.
Very lucid
Post automatically merged:
Very lucid
