It was Nihilus>Traya>Sion.And the gap was so immense that Sion would be a non-factor
I honestly don't see why people are always surprised at praise for Nihilus, the guy has some of the most impressive on-panel feats and descriptions in the verse. How many sith lords have repeatedly (and single-handedly) wiped out civilizations and used the force on a planetary scale?
I always thought Disney making people care about the robots in Star Wars was stupid. Yeah, people care about robot feelings in some franchises. Star Wars is not one of them. Robots are treated as fundamentally disposable in the original films and the prequels.
Disney has characters cry over droids now which just, should not happen in Star Wars. Losing a droid in Star Wars should be like losing your favourite knife. Annoying but not sad. Lol.
I'd give it to Dooku, just a matchup advantage, Windu wouldn't be able to win due to the fact that Vaapad wouldn't really do well against almost zero rage Dooku, also Prime Dooku was always considered to be the more talented duelist.
As far as I remember, every time Windu and Dooku crossed blades, Dooku had the upper hand.
I'd give it to Dooku, just a matchup advantage, Windu wouldn't be able to win due to the fact that Vaapad wouldn't really do well against almost zero rage Dooku, also Prime Dooku was always considered to be the more talented duelist.
As far as I remember, every time Windu and Dooku crossed blades, Dooku had the upper hand.
It would take a long time to write, but I rank ancient sith lords far higher than newer sith or jedi.
Dooku might as well be technically more skilled than many duelists, but he'd be overwhelmed by the sheer physical stats and force mastery gap.
For example, Plagueis is a worse duelist than Dooku, but Plagueis was so powerful with the force that he could completely break through his force defense and ragdoll him.
Bane went to a stormy planet to train, he deflected the rain with his blade and was completely dry once he returned back to his ship, Dooku simply doesn't have those crazy speed feats either.
It would take a long time to write, but I rank ancient sith lords far higher than newer sith or jedi.
Dooku might as well be technically more skilled than many duelists, but he'd be overwhelmed by the sheer physical stats and force mastery gap.
For example, Plagueis is a worse duelist than Dooku, but Plagueis was so powerful with the force that he could completely break through his force defense and ragdoll him.
Bane went to a stormy planet to train, he deflected the rain with his blade and was completely dry once he returned back to his ship, Dooku simply doesn't have those crazy speed feats either.
I know some people might find it crazy that Makashi Master Dooku might get overpowered by physical stats only, but remember that dueling noob Savage was able to disarm Dooku just because of his huge physical strength.
Imagine what ancient sith lords can do, many of them are super skilled, but they're also many times more physically stronger than Savage.
It would take a long time to write, but I rank ancient sith lords far higher than newer sith or jedi.
Dooku might as well be technically more skilled than many duelists, but he'd be overwhelmed by the sheer physical stats and force mastery gap.
For example, Plagueis is a worse duelist than Dooku, but Plagueis was so powerful with the force that he could completely break through his force defense and ragdoll him.
Bane went to a stormy planet to train, he deflected the rain with his blade and was completely dry once he returned back to his ship, Dooku simply doesn't have those crazy speed feats either.
Post automatically merged:
I know some people might find it crazy that Makashi Master Dooku might get overpowered by physical stats only, but remember that dueling noob Savage was able to disarm Dooku just because of his huge physical strength.
Imagine what ancient sith lords can do, many of them are super skilled, but they're also many times more physically stronger than Savage.
To be fair would that not be because of those characters being from expanded works where crazy feats are more common? Or are contemporary characters like Dooku less impressive in those too?
I do agree Ancient Sith are probably superior generally, they also likely had more competition as they used to fight large scale wars and such.
To be fair would that not be because of those characters being from expanded works where crazy feats are more common? Or are contemporary characters like Dooku less impressive in those too?
I do agree Ancient Sith are probably superior generally, they also likely had more competition as they used to fight large scale wars and such.
I guess the biggest problem was the conflict of ideas, J.J Abrams had his own visions for the story while Rian Johnson had the opposite, so it's really weird when you watch the trilogy and movies contradict each other.
I guess the biggest problem was the conflict of ideas, J.J Abrams had his own visions for the story while Rian Johnson had the opposite, so it's really weird when you watch the trilogy and movies contradict each other.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.