So you can use the possibility of them not being defeated but I can't use the same argument (assumption) that Roger fought Xebec 1v1?
You say to respect Garp and Roger yet can't think of the possibility of they winning the 2v4, specially you, the possibility guy.
You disappoint me, Lanji.
Anyway this discussion of what could've been doesn't lead anywhere, so good luck to see whether you were right or not.
You say to respect Garp and Roger yet can't think of the possibility of they winning the 2v4, specially you, the possibility guy.
You disappoint me, Lanji.
Anyway this discussion of what could've been doesn't lead anywhere, so good luck to see whether you were right or not.
but its not confirmed
thats the point . I am not going to claim they were all defeated that day. sometimes taking down the captain is enough. look at wb crew
and after the result of the battle roger and wb became equals so again
whats the problem?
you are not one to talk about disrespecting garp. you claim he doesnt want to be an admiral because roger helped him take down rocks. you claim one of his greatest feats was likely done by roger alone. you claim garp is the one who asked riger for help all without a single panel in sight.
You have lost all credibility.
you are unworthy of the name cumming
unworthy of your rank
unworthy of your title
YOU ARE UNWORTHY
its no longer cumming its coming now smh.
are you trying to imply roger and wb werent equal? cause if you are I have posted panels above. if not then we really dont have to argue over something thats not confirmed.
Last edited: