Controversial this scene ruined Zoro.

#21
Even his feud with King could have been more personal and ideological.
It was already personnal and ideological. You just missed it. Every fights of Zoro are a personnal struggle. As for the rest, 1. Tashigi was not in Wano and had no place there, 2. Zoro do not seem to care about the history of the blades.
 
#22
Wano also could have been the opportunity for Zoro to learn more about the great blades, how they were forged, their history and power, and to get a better understanding of his own blades. It could also have been an opportunity to revisit his relations with Kuina and Tashigi upon learning about his family and how Kuina's family came from Wano. Even his feud with King could have been more personal and ideological.
Land of swords.
Land of samurai.
Land of pyrobloin.
Land of poneglyphs.

And we explore none.
 
#28
Land of swords.
Land of samurai.
Land of pyrobloin.
Land of poneglyphs.

And we explore none.
> Sword are not central to the story outside of a few characters.
> Samurai and samurai thinking are literally at the center of the story of wano
> "Land of pyrobloin" > The question is, is there something to develop? If you create yourself the mystery, then you also create your own expectation. Oda simply stated that Kairuseki originated Wano. That's all there is to understand for now and there is no more mystery outside of what we could perhaps consider to be a void century mystery. Meaning > Not explained in Wano, but later.
> The poneglyphs was literally a point of interest at the end of Wano. As for the skill of writing in poneglyph. This is clearly setup to be explained during the void century flashback.

Again, people ignoring the obvious and creating their own expectations out of thin air (meaning without story set-up) and wondering why they don't like the story anymore....

Media literacy is ded
 
Last edited:
Top