non sequitur
I'm not ignoring it.
You claimed earlier you were prepared to bet your life on it so this is revisionist. What's crucial here is that you would have seen me correctly argue that your position was not wholly genuine and instead of having that affect your posting at all you ignored it, only to come back to it later. Town have no need to be performative in their pushes. This isn't merely faking confidence, it's taking one extreme, being called out for it, allowing that to continue when it's a source of conflict between two so called town reads of yours, and then later playing it down when it's easier to move away from it.
And instead of bringing anything else worthwhile to the table you've just rolled over. I think I'm good with your death.
this can't be a real thought, my read on you was only above rand (null/scum) at the time and i always posture and make pushes in ways to gain some reaction even if i wasn't fully on board. when u were spinning my read on hime as a contradiction because of that derp post i thought hol up maybe he's actually really scum struggling. when i said id toss u in the kingmaker i wanted to see if u were gonna go back on it or switch it up.
there is no taking shit to extreme 30 hours before the day, like is the expectation here for scum!ekko to rattle town!ratchet 30 hours or so before day end and expect u to just sit and do nothing about it? this is plurality
after you started town telling i changed my read accordingly, there is no rolling over, what do you want, me continuously tunneling you?
i think there is a case i may not bother making today but your engagement this day has been sort of shielding alot of the inactive slots and pushing more heat on the active ones, i overlooked alot of your play but your positions mostly required an active player to be scum, namely one in me/flower. i think your continuous focus on this angle after being debunked is pretty bad.