[FNZ] Role Madness Toonami Mafia I: Fullmetal Alchemist

[Grammaton]

I'm still thinking about how to use my stone tbh. Don't have many options.

just save it until there’s something worthwhile to use it on?

 

[Worst]

What?

1. Mafia culted into town
2. Town* culted into mafia

*Previously mafia

There's nothing wrong here

he's talking about the other who got culted as a consequence of the cult xD

 

[Flower]

just save it until there’s something worthwhile to use it on?

I guess I have to wait, yeah.

 

[Charlie]

he's talking about the other who got culted as a consequence of the cult xD

 

[Grammaton]

Wait, 2 people got culted?

 

[Fujishiro]

What?

1. Mafia culted into town
2. Town* culted into mafia

*Previously mafia

There's nothing wrong here

No i mean the wording:

Philosopher stone was activated to amp a ability to convert a player but they were already converted. Converting them back to their original alignment and joining them

Im assuming this is the user joining the convertee into their original alignment, thus I believe that the user being of the convertees original alignment is less likely.

 

[Dr_Professor83]

Wait, 2 people got culted?

Technically one got un culted it looks like.

 

[Fujishiro]

Technically one got un culted it looks like.

Well culted back and brought a gift wrap present with him. The guy/gal whos eused the stone might've gotten omega cucked tbh lol.

 

[Joygirl1]

What are the options here ?

- Scum tried to return their teammate back to scum but that would expose their teammate cuz he was converted by a town
- Scum team A wanted to actually convert someone but they were already converted , an indie or Scum team B
- An unlucky town/indie picked the wrong target ?

My guess would be the last one unfortunately. So the person that got converted twice must be someone who was already that much in the spotlight that two different townies tried to convert them. Otherwise it would be really strange for becoming a target twice. So, it´s most likely that the converted one was Ekko, Ratchet, Flowa, Rottkins as they were the most discussed and suspected users so far in this thread. Probably add Professor, Blue, TAC or Pero to that. Sounds still like much options but out of 30 players it narrows the possible targets at least a bit down in my opinion.

 

[Dr_Professor83]

Professor

It would be meme worthy if I’d been hit by 3 conversions in one day but unfortunately not me lol.

 

[Worst]

X is scum team A -> gets converted to Town
Y is scum team A -> tries to convert X, but X was already converted to town as a consequence X gets converted back to scum team A and Y gets culted into scum team A but Y was already that alignment so he couldn't be " culted "
( unless a conversion on the same alignment doesn't necessarily fail just appears as a successfull action )

 

[Flower]

Not me either.

 

[Fujishiro]

My guess would be the last one unfortunately. So the person that got converted twice must be someone who was already that much in the spotlight that two different townies tried to convert them. Otherwise it would be really strange for becoming a target twice. So, it´s most likely that the converted one was Ekko, Ratchet, Flowa, Rottkins as they were the most discussed and suspected users so far in this thread. Probably add Professor, Blue, TAC or Pero to that. Sounds still like much options but out of 30 players it narrows the possible targets at least a bit down in my opinion.

Prof is less likely as a conversion already failed on him and he claimed with no CC.

Ekko is the most likely target if we try to think of this from the users POV, rule out Flowa for reasons I dont wanna disclose and If Ratchet is who I think he is then he shouldnt be convertable. Idk about the rest tbh.

 

[Peroroncino]

 

[Fujishiro]

@Ariess : Make an Aries WU.

Players:

 

[Joygirl1]

Forgot about Prof already converted before, yes, in that case we can rule him out for this^^

 

[Worst]

@Ariess : Make an Aries WU.

Players:

a real role of madness xD

 

[Grammaton]

Someone tag me when we’re focusing more on the definite and less on the possible pls

 

[Charlie]

No i mean the wording:


Im assuming this is the user joining the convertee into their original alignment, thus I believe that the user being of the convertees original alignment is less likely.

Honestly I don't see an issue with wording here. I mean I see your point but I don't think it matters that much

 

[Flower]

This just became a HxH game lol.